Investigating the role of diffusion in hydrocarbon gas huff-n-puff injection-an Eagle Ford study

被引:0
|
作者
Fu, Qinwen [1 ]
Cudjoe, Sherifa [1 ]
Ghahfarokhi, Reza Barati [1 ,2 ]
Tsau, Jyun-Syung [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaoli [1 ]
Peltier, K. [2 ]
Mohrbacher, D. [3 ]
Baldwin, A. [3 ]
Nicoud, B. [3 ]
Bradford, K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Chem & Petr Engn C&PE, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Tertiary Oil Recovery Program TORP, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[3] Chesapeake Energy, Oklahoma City, OK USA
关键词
Molecular diffusion; Hydrocarbon gas huff-n-puff; Dual-permeability; Rock-fluid property; Gas injection; Eagle Ford shale; Unconventional reservoirs; EOR; IOR; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2020.108146
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Fracture complexity, variation in fluid properties, variations in rock types and diffusion of gas from the fracture into the oil-saturated nano-pores are the main contributing factors in oil recovery using gas huff-n-puff injection. Limited research has been conducted to define diffusion coefficients coupled with rock tortuosity resulting in calculation of effective diffusion. The objective of this work is to conduct a comprehensive experimental and simulation study on lower Eagle Ford rock samples to measure diffusion coefficients for different injection cycles in three representative rock samples from the main flow unit. Three representative rock samples were selected based on their differences in petrophysical properties. Saturated volumes were measured using a low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurement and confirmed with material balance for cores saturated at reservoir conditions. Pressure was recorded during a one-day diffusion process before it was dropped linearly at the end of each cycle for production, and effluent oil and gas compositions were measured. NMR measurement was repeated at the end. Three compositional simulation models were set up for three different samples using tortuosity values from FIB-SEM analysis to simulate experimental diffusion and production. For history matching, relative permeability curves, fracture properties, and tortuosity were tuned to match pressure and production results for three representative samples. Pressure profiles vary significantly between different cycles caused by invasion of the gaseous phase into a new section of the pore network during each cycle. Effective diffusion coefficients were calculated using representative tortuosity values. Diffusion was represented by pressure drop during soaking time. This pressure drop varies across different lithofacies and for different rock samples. For produced oil, the concentration of lighter oil components declined from the first to the last cycle of gas injection while the concentration of the intermediate components increased. Gas huff-n-puff injection into shale oil reservoirs were being investigated from the point of view of diffusion and variations in rock properties for the first time and measurements were validated using numerical simulation. The huff-n-puff experiments, conducted using a constant volume diffusion cell with locally produced hydrocarbon gas and stock-tank oil, show favorable results. Recovery factors for samples A, B, and C are 57.5%, 56.7%, and 51.7%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An integrated workflow to characterize lower Eagle Ford shale for hydrocarbon gas huff-n-puff simulation
    Cudjoe, Sherifa E.
    Ghahfarokhi, Reza Barati
    Goldstein, Robert H.
    Tsau, Jyung-Syung
    Nicoud, Brian
    Bradford, Kyle
    Baldwin, Amanda
    Mohrbacher, David
    [J]. FUEL, 2021, 289
  • [2] Methane Huff-n-Puff in Eagle Ford Shale - An Experimental and Modelling Study
    Alinejad, Amin
    Dehghanpour, Hassan
    [J]. FUEL, 2024, 359
  • [3] Field Gas Huff-n-Puff for Improving Oil Recovery in the Eagle Ford Shale-The Effect of Injection Gas Composition and Cycle
    Nguyen, Quoc P.
    Sie, Chao-yu
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2023, 37 (07) : 5154 - 5164
  • [4] Investigation of asphaltene deposition mechanisms during CO2 huff-n-puff injection in Eagle Ford shale
    Shen, Ziqi
    Sheng, James J.
    [J]. PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 35 (20) : 1960 - 1966
  • [5] Laboratory experiments of field gas huff-n-puff for improving oil recovery from Eagle Ford Shale reservoirs
    Chao-yu Sie
    Quoc Nguyen
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (21)
  • [6] Numerical Simulation Study of Huff-n-Puff Hydrocarbon Gas Injection Parameters for Enhanced Shale Oil Recovery
    Garipova, Alsu
    Mukhina, Elena
    Cheremisin, Alexander
    Spivakova, Margarita
    Kasyanenko, Anton
    Cheremisin, Alexey
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (03)
  • [7] Optimization of huff-n-puff gas injection in a shale gas condensate reservoir
    Meng, Xingbang
    Sheng, James J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UNCONVENTIONAL OIL AND GAS RESOURCES, 2016, 16 : 34 - 44
  • [8] Huff-n-puff gas injection or gas flooding in tight oil reservoirs?
    Tang, Weiyu
    Sheng, James J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 208
  • [9] Optimization of huff-n-puff gas injection in shale oil reservoirs
    James JSheng
    [J]. Petroleum., 2017, 3 (04) - 437
  • [10] Selection of hydrocarbon gas for huff-n-puff IOR in shale oil reservoirs
    Ozowe, Williams
    Zheng, Shuang
    Sharma, Mukul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 195