Econometric analysis of pricing and energy policy regulations in Japan electric power exchange spot market

被引:7
|
作者
Suliman, Mohamed Saad [1 ]
Farzaneh, Hooman [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch Engn Sci, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Transdisciplinary Res & Educ Ctr Green Technol, Fukuoka, Japan
来源
关键词
RENEWABLE ENERGY; WIND GENERATION; IMPACT; PRICES; REFORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.clet.2022.100523
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study aims to provide a quantitative overview of the energy policy regulations concerning the Japan spot market liberalization and analyzes the market clearing price (MCP) and the regional spot prices based on the hourly contribution of the supply stack mix and the merit order effect. In addition, it estimates the regional spot prices interdependency on the MCP. The study acquires an hourly dataset in panel data format from 2016 to 2020 with total observations of 438,240 data records. The developed econometric models include panel data regression using fixed-effect estimator, ordinary least square, and two-stage least square equations. From the results, a one GWh addition from nuclear, hydroelectric, geothermal, biomass, solar, or wind power production technologies decreases spot prices. Contrarily, adding one GWh from thermal, hydroelectric storage, or regional interconnections raises the spot prices by 27.4, 606, 103 (sic)/MWh, respectively. The spot prices of Hokuriku and Chugoku tend to offset the price spikes in Kansai, while Tokyo and Tohoku spot prices are significantly related. Adding one (sic)/kWh to Tohoku spot price is estimated to raise the MCP by 0.35 (sic)/kWh, while the addition of one (sic)/kWh to Tokyo spot price is estimated to increase the MCP by 0.04 (sic)/kWh. Furthermore, Kyushu and Tohoku, followed by Chubu, have appreciable control over the MCP. The study further highlighted policy implications to constrain the applications of hydroelectric storage as the costliest solution to balance the intermittency of renewable energy sources.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] APPROACHES AND METHODS FOR THE ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF MARKET POWER: A SURVEY AND EMPIRICAL COMPARISON
    Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr
    Glauben, Thomas
    Grings, Michael
    Teuber, Ramona
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2017, 31 (01) : 303 - 325
  • [42] Competition in Germany's Minute Reserve Power Market: An Econometric Analysis
    Haucap, Justus
    Heimeshoff, Ulrich
    Jovanovic, Dragon
    [J]. ENERGY JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (02): : 137 - 156
  • [43] Cost Analysis and Pricing Policy of Wind Power in China
    Wang, Qin
    Wen, Fushuan
    Yang, Aimin
    Huang, Jiansheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2011, 137 (03): : 138 - 150
  • [44] The "Power Elite" and Environmental-Energy Policy in Japan
    DeWit, Andrew
    Tetsunari, Iida
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL-JAPAN FOCUS, 2011, 9 (04):
  • [45] Market Power in Emissions Trading and Renewable Energy Policy
    Ito, Mari
    Takashima, Ryuta
    [J]. ICORES: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, 2019, : 429 - 434
  • [46] Analysis on the environmental effects of energy pricing policy in Iran
    Soheily, Q
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT - A WORLD OF CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 405 - 409
  • [47] Methodological Approach for Harmonization of the Investment and Pricing Policy Options in the Electric Power Industry
    Veselov, F. V.
    Solyanik, A., I
    [J]. 2017 TENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MANAGEMENT OF LARGE-SCALE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT (MLSD), 2017,
  • [48] Pricing for renewable energy - Electric utilities launch green power programs
    Goldstein, J
    [J]. BIOCYCLE, 2002, 43 (07) : 70 - 70
  • [49] Outline of Japan electric meters inspection corporation and electric power/energy standard
    [J]. Journal of the Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, 2019, 139 (07): : 430 - 433
  • [50] FORWARD EXCHANGE-RATES AS OPTIMAL PREDICTORS OF FUTURE SPOT RATES - AN ECONOMETRIC-ANALYSIS
    HANSEN, LP
    HODRICK, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1980, 88 (05) : 829 - 853