Tramadol versus fentanyl during propofol- based deep sedation for uterine dilatation and curettage: A prospective study

被引:3
|
作者
Tas, Ayca [1 ]
Mistanoglu, Veli [1 ]
Darcin, Sevtap [1 ]
Kececioglu, Melahat [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Faruk Sukan Matern & Child Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, TR-42000 Nalcaci, Konya, Turkey
关键词
fentanyl; tramadol; uterine dilatation and curettage; DILATION;
D O I
10.1111/jog.12259
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
AimDilatation and curettage (D&C) is a common day-care procedure in obstetrics and gynecology, with patients discharged after a brief hospital stay on the same day of the surgery. Although it has a short duration, severe pain occurs during the procedure. Therefore, this surgical procedure requires an anesthetic to provide adequate analgesia, rapid onset, and rapid recovery. The main objective of the present study was to compare the analgesic effectiveness and safety of tramadol with those of fentanyl during D&C. MethodsThe study comprised 100 women with American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I-II who were scheduled for a D&C procedure. Baseline anesthesia was maintained with 1mg/kg propofol, and the patients were then randomly allocated to receive tramadol 1mg/kg (Group T, n=50) or fentanyl 1g/kg (Group F, n=50). Hemodynamic variables, sedation, pain, the Aldrete recovery score, and side-effects were recorded. ResultsSpO(2) levels in Group F in the 5th min and at the end of the procedure were significantly lower than those in Group T (P=0.024 and 0.021, respectively). ConclusionTramadol provides similar analgesic efficacy to fentanyl. Furthermore, tramadol may provide better respiratory stability in patients undergoing a D&C procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 753
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety and Efficacy of Deep Sedation for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Propofol Versus Propofol Plus Midazolam, Randomized Prospective Study
    Kim, Kyoung-Oh
    Huh, Kyung Rim
    Park, Cheol Hee
    Hahn, Taeho
    Park, Sang Hoon
    Yoo, Kyo-Sang
    Kim, Jong Hyeok
    Park, Choong Kee
    Lee, Kyung-Hun
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB228 - AB228
  • [22] Sedation During EGD in Cirrhotic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Propofol and Fentanyl Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl
    Correia, Lucianna M.
    Queiroz, Danielle
    Lenz, Luciano
    Tafarel, Jean
    Gomes, Gustavo F.
    Martins, Fernanda P.
    Nakao, Frank S.
    Rodrigues, Rodrigo A.
    Rohr, Maria Rachel S.
    Ferrari, Angelo P.
    Libera, Ermelindo D.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB211 - AB211
  • [23] Deep Sedation Events During Diagnostic Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized Study of the Regimens Propofol-Fentanyl and Midazolam-Fentanyl
    Lera Dos Santos, Marcos E.
    De Moura, Eduardo G.
    Sakai, Paulo
    Matuguma, Sergio E.
    Ide, Edson
    Chaves, Dalton M.
    Luz, Gustavo
    Souza, Thiago F.
    Pessorrusso, Fernanda C.
    Mestieri, Luiz H.
    Maluf-Filho, Fauze
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 367 - 367
  • [24] Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Steenholdt, Casper
    Jensen, Jeppe T.
    Brynskov, Jorn
    Moller, Ann Merete
    Limschou, Anne Christine
    Konge, Lars
    Vilmann, Peter
    CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 20 (03) : 559 - +
  • [25] Moderate level sedation during endoscopy: a prospective study using low-dose propofol, meperldine/fentanyl, and midazolam
    Cohen, LB
    Hightower, CD
    Wood, DA
    Miller, KM
    Aisenberg, J
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (07) : 795 - 803
  • [26] Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study
    Angsuwatcharakon, Phonthep
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    Ridtitid, Wiriyaporn
    Kongkam, Pradermchai
    Poonyathawon, Sahadol
    Ponauthai, Yuwadee
    Sumdin, Sakolkan
    Kullavanijaya, Pinit
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [27] Cocktail Sedation Containing Propofol Versus Conventional Sedation for ERCP: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study
    Angsuwatcharakon, Phonthep
    Ponauthai, Yuwadee
    Rerknimitr, Rungsun
    Ridtitid, Wiriyaporn
    Kongkam, Pradermchai
    Prempracha, Narongrit
    Treeprasertsuk, Sombat
    Kullavanijaya, Pinit
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (05) : AB271 - AB271
  • [28] Cocktail sedation containing propofol versus conventional sedation for ERCP: a prospective, randomized controlled study
    Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon
    Rungsun Rerknimitr
    Wiriyaporn Ridtitid
    Pradermchai Kongkam
    Sahadol Poonyathawon
    Yuwadee Ponauthai
    Sakolkan Sumdin
    Pinit Kullavanijaya
    BMC Anesthesiology, 12
  • [29] Etomidate plus propofol versus propofol alone for sedation during gastroscopy: a randomized prospective clinical trial
    Zhou, Xiang
    Li, Bi-Xi
    Chen, Li-Min
    Tao, Jun
    Zhang, Sui
    Ji, Meng
    Wu, Ming-Chun
    Chen, Min
    Zhang, Yan-Hui
    Gan, Guo-Shen
    Song, Xiao-Yang
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (11): : 5108 - 5116
  • [30] Etomidate plus propofol versus propofol alone for sedation during gastroscopy: a randomized prospective clinical trial
    Xiang Zhou
    Bi-Xi Li
    Li-Min Chen
    Jun Tao
    Sui Zhang
    Meng Ji
    Ming-Chun Wu
    Min Chen
    Yan-Hui Zhang
    Guo-Shen Gan
    Xiao-Yang Song
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 5108 - 5116