In-flight validation and routine measurements

被引:20
|
作者
Beck, P [1 ]
Bartlett, D
O'Brien, K
Schrewe, UJ
机构
[1] Austrian Res Ctr, A-2444 Seibersdorf, Austria
[2] Natl Radiol Protect Board, Didcot OX11 0RQ, Oxon, England
[3] No Arizona Univ, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[4] Phys Tech Bundesanstalt, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032962
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Different methods of aircrew dose assessment are under discussion and evaluation by several international research groups. The TEPC (tissue-equivalent proportional counter) has been used very successfully to describe the radiation field during in-flight measurements. Cosmic ray transport calculations of effective dose have been compared with TEPC measurements, with good results. Several active conventional photon and neutron detectors, as well as a passive dosemeter, have been prepared and characterised for in-flight radiation measurements. A novel method, combining measurements with a conventional radiation detector and results of cosmic ray transport calculations is at present under evaluation in the European research project ACREM (Air Crew Radiation Monitor). Superimposed on the regular and more-or-less predictable eleven year cosmic ray intensity variation, events on the sun will occasionally result in high energy particle fluxes that will impact on the tellurian atmosphere and result in unforeseen high additional radiation exposures. Appropriate methods to determine the resulting radiation dose rates will be described.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 308
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Instrumentation of remote controlled airship "Lotte" for in-flight measurements
    Kungl, P
    Schlenker, M
    Wimmer, DA
    Kröplin, BH
    [J]. AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 8 (07) : 599 - 610
  • [23] In-Flight Array Measurements of Tail Rotor Harmonic Noise
    Sargent, D. Caleb
    Schmitz, Fredric H.
    Sim, Ben W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HELICOPTER SOCIETY, 2010, 55 (01)
  • [24] In-flight comparison of MOZAIC and POLINAT water vapor measurements
    Helten, M
    Smit, HGJ
    Kley, D
    Ovarlez, J
    Schlager, H
    Baumann, R
    Schumann, U
    Nedelec, P
    Marenco, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D21) : 26087 - 26096
  • [25] In-flight photogrammetric camera calibration and validation via complementary lidar
    Gneeniss, A. S.
    Mills, J. P.
    Miller, P. E.
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2015, 100 : 3 - 13
  • [26] A Method for Computing the VOR Multipath Error - Comparisons with In-flight Measurements
    Claudepierre, Ludovic
    Douvenot, Remi
    Chabory, Alexandre
    Morlaas, Christophe
    [J]. 2016 10TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP), 2016,
  • [27] IN-FLIGHT BOUNDARY-LAYER-TRANSITION MEASUREMENTS ON A SWEPT WING
    AHMED, A
    WENTZ, WH
    NYENHUIS, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 1989, 26 (11): : 979 - 985
  • [28] In-flight fast-timing measurements in 152Sm
    Plaisir, C.
    Gaudefroy, L.
    Meot, V.
    Blanc, A.
    Daugas, J. M.
    Roig, O.
    Arnal, N.
    Bonnet, T.
    Gobet, F.
    Hannachi, F.
    Tarisien, M.
    Versteegen, M.
    Roger, T.
    Rejmund, M.
    Navin, A.
    Schmitt, C.
    Fremont, G.
    Goupil, J.
    Pancin, J.
    Spitaels, C.
    Zielinska, M.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2014, 89 (02):
  • [29] In-flight skin friction measurements using oil film interferometry
    Drake, Aaron
    Kennelly Jr., Robert A.
    [J]. Journal of Aircraft, 36 (04): : 723 - 725
  • [30] Subjective Measurements of In-Flight Sleep, Circadian Variation, and Their Relationship with Fatigue
    van den Berg, Margo J.
    Wu, Lora J.
    Gander, Philippa H.
    [J]. AEROSPACE MEDICINE AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2016, 87 (10) : 869 - 875