A test of efficiency for the S&P 500 index option market using the generalized spectrum method

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Henry H. [1 ]
Wang, Kent [2 ]
Wang, Zhanglong [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Finance, Zhongli, Taiwan
[2] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Guosen Secur Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Model-Free Forward Variance; Spectral density test; Index jump; Market efficiency; STOCK RETURN PREDICTABILITY; EQUITY PREMIUM PREDICTION; TIME-SERIES; MARTINGALE HYPOTHESIS; RISK PREMIA; VOLATILITY; SAMPLE; PERFORMANCE; PREFERENCE; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the efficiency of the S&P 500 options market by testing the martingale properties of the Model-Free Forward Variance (MFFV) time series using the Generalized Spectral Test (GST). Based on a sample from January 1, 1996 to May 31, 2010, our tests show robust evidence that the S&P 500 options market is not efficient. By examining the subsamples before and after the 2008 financial crisis, we find this options market inefficiency is mainly driven by the outbreak of the subprime crisis. Our diagnostic tests further indicate that this inefficiency is due to the skewness-in-mean effect of forward variance. Specifically, the skewness-in-mean effect is weakened once we account for the S&P 500 index jump effects. Hence, we can establish a link between jumps and options market inefficiency. Finally, we find that the lagged skewness of the forward variance can help forecasting the forward variance both in sample and out-of-sample. The economic significance of this forecasting ability is further highlighted by the performance of a trading strategy based on forward variance. In sum, out study provides robust evidence and a trading implication on testing the S&P 500 options market efficiency. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 70
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extraction of the Essential Constituents of the S&P 500 Index
    Hashemi, Ray R.
    Ardakani, Omid M.
    Bahrami, Azita A.
    Young, Jeffrey A.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (CSCI), 2017, : 351 - 356
  • [32] Forecasting with Deep Learning: S&P 500 index
    Kamalov, Firuz
    Smail, Linda
    Gurrib, Ikhlaas
    [J]. 2020 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND DESIGN (ISCID 2020), 2020, : 422 - 425
  • [33] The competitive effects of S&P 500 Index revisions
    Chen, Sheng-Syan
    Lin, Yueh-Hsiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2018, 45 (7-8) : 997 - 1027
  • [34] Remarks on the Calculation of Earnings in the S&P 500 Index
    Keppler, Michael
    Xue, Xing-Hong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTING, 2011, 20 (03): : 15 - 17
  • [35] S&P 500 Index revisions and credit spreads
    Baran, Lindsay
    Li, Ying
    Liu, Chang
    Liu, Zilong
    Pu, Xiaoling
    [J]. REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 36 (04) : 348 - 363
  • [36] Alternatives to Alternative Assets: Assessing S&P 500 Index Option Strategies as Hedge Fund Replacements
    Ge, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS, 2018, 20 (04): : 69 - 80
  • [37] Is volatility risk priced in the securities market? Evidence from S&P 500 index options
    Arisoy, Yakup Eser
    Salih, Aslihan
    Akdeniz, Levent
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2007, 27 (07) : 617 - 642
  • [38] S&P 500 Index Price Spillovers around the COVID-19 Market Meltdown
    Lento, Camillo
    Gradojevic, Nikola
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 14 (07)
  • [39] Negative returns on addition to the S&P 500 index and positive returns on deletion? New evidence on the attractiveness of S&P 500 versus S&P 400 indexes
    Vijh, Anand M.
    Wang, Jiawei
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 51 (04) : 1127 - 1164
  • [40] Effect of Ap-Index of Geomagnetic Activity on S&P 500 Stock Market Return
    Peng, Lifang
    Li, Ning
    Pan, Jingwen
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ASTRONOMY, 2019, 2019