A test of efficiency for the S&P 500 index option market using the generalized spectrum method

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Henry H. [1 ]
Wang, Kent [2 ]
Wang, Zhanglong [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Finance, Zhongli, Taiwan
[2] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Guosen Secur Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Model-Free Forward Variance; Spectral density test; Index jump; Market efficiency; STOCK RETURN PREDICTABILITY; EQUITY PREMIUM PREDICTION; TIME-SERIES; MARTINGALE HYPOTHESIS; RISK PREMIA; VOLATILITY; SAMPLE; PERFORMANCE; PREFERENCE; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.007
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the efficiency of the S&P 500 options market by testing the martingale properties of the Model-Free Forward Variance (MFFV) time series using the Generalized Spectral Test (GST). Based on a sample from January 1, 1996 to May 31, 2010, our tests show robust evidence that the S&P 500 options market is not efficient. By examining the subsamples before and after the 2008 financial crisis, we find this options market inefficiency is mainly driven by the outbreak of the subprime crisis. Our diagnostic tests further indicate that this inefficiency is due to the skewness-in-mean effect of forward variance. Specifically, the skewness-in-mean effect is weakened once we account for the S&P 500 index jump effects. Hence, we can establish a link between jumps and options market inefficiency. Finally, we find that the lagged skewness of the forward variance can help forecasting the forward variance both in sample and out-of-sample. The economic significance of this forecasting ability is further highlighted by the performance of a trading strategy based on forward variance. In sum, out study provides robust evidence and a trading implication on testing the S&P 500 options market efficiency. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 70
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determinants of S&P 500 index option returns
    Cao C.
    Huang J.-Z.
    [J]. Review of Derivatives Research, 2007, 10 (1) : 1 - 38
  • [2] Economic significance of risk premiums in the S&P 500 option market
    Balyeat, RB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2002, 22 (12) : 1147 - 1178
  • [3] A nonlinear factor analysis of S&P 500 index option returns
    Jones, Christopher S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (05): : 2325 - 2363
  • [4] THE INFORMATION CONTENT OF THE S&P 500 INDEX AND VIX OPTIONS ON THE DYNAMICS OF THE S&P 500 INDEX
    Chung, San-Lin
    Tsai, Wei-Che
    Wang, Yaw-Huei
    Weng, Pei-Shih
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2011, 31 (12) : 1170 - 1201
  • [5] S&P 500 index option tests of Jarrow and Rudd's approximate option valuation formula
    Corrado, CJ
    Su, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 1996, 16 (06) : 611 - 629
  • [6] Option pricing under stock market cycles with jump risks: evidence from the S&P 500 index
    Wang, Shin-Yun
    Chuang, Ming-Che
    Lin, Shih-Kuei
    Shyu, So-De
    [J]. REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2021, 56 (01) : 25 - 51
  • [7] Option pricing under stock market cycles with jump risks: evidence from the S&P 500 index
    Shin-Yun Wang
    Ming-Che Chuang
    Shih-Kuei Lin
    So-De Shyu
    [J]. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2021, 56 : 25 - 51
  • [8] Mispricing and trader positions in the S&P 500 index futures market
    Lai, Ya-Wen
    Lin, Chiou-Fa
    Tang, Mei-Ling
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2017, 42 : 250 - 265
  • [9] Improving futures hedging performance using option information: Evidence from the S&P 500 index
    Bai, Yujuan
    Pan, Zhiyuan
    Liu, Li
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 28 : 112 - 117
  • [10] Post-'87 crash fears in the S&P 500 futures option market
    Bates, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2000, 94 (1-2) : 181 - 238