Mineralogical Composition of Urinary Stones and Their Frequency in Patients: Relationship to Gender and Age

被引:14
|
作者
Keshavarzi, Behnam [1 ]
Ashayeri, Nasrin Yavar [1 ]
Moore, Farid [1 ]
Irani, Dariush [2 ]
Asadi, Sina [1 ]
Zarasvandi, Alireza [3 ]
Salari, Mehrdad [4 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Coll Sci, Shiraz 71454, Iran
[2] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Shahid Faghihi Hosp, Dept Urol & Endourol, Zand St,POB 71344, Shiraz, Iran
[3] Shahid Chamran Univ, Dept Geol, Ahvaz 87234, Iran
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Shaheed Faghihi Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Zand St,POB 71344, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
mineralogy; urinary stone; XRD and SEM; gender and age; Fars; KIDNEY-STONES; CALCULI; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROVINCE; ELEMENTS;
D O I
10.3390/min6040131
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
This investigation reports the mineralogy and possible pathological significance of urinary stones removed from patients in Fars province, Iran. X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and polarizing microscope (PM) techniques were used to investigate the mineralogical compositions of urinary stones. The identified mineral components include whewellite, weddellite, hydroxyapatite, uricite and cystine. These techniques revealed that the whewellite and uricite were the most common mineral phases. Platy-like/monoclinic whewellite, prismatic/monoclinic uric acid and hexagonal cystine crystals were revealed by SEM. Biominerals (calcium carbonate) and quartz were also identified in PM images. Of the variables determining the type of precipitated minerals, the effects of pH on depositional conditions proved to be the most apparent parameter, as shown by occurrences and relationships among the studied minerals. Our results revealed the importance of detailed knowledge of mineralogical composition in assessing the effects of age and sex. The highest incidence of urinary stones was observed in the 40-60 age group. Calcium oxalate and uric acid stones are more frequent in men than women. Finally, the study concluded that knowledge of the mineralogical composition of urinary stones is important as it helps the scientific community to explain the chemistry and the etiology of the calculi in the urinary system.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] THE COMPOSITION OF URINARY STONES IN CENTRAL SINDH
    Memon, Jan Muhammad
    Naqvi, Syed Qaiser Hussain
    Bozdar, Ali Gohar
    Khaskheli, Muhammad Hassan
    Athar, M. Amin
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2014, 20 (01): : 85 - 89
  • [22] Urinary stones in pediatric age group
    Onen, Abdurrahman
    TURK PEDIATRI ARSIVI-TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS, 2010, 45 : 104 - 109
  • [23] Renal stones chemical composition with age and gender distribution in Punjab Pakistan: A retrospective study
    Zubair, M.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2022, 530 : S234 - S235
  • [24] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN URINARY STONE FORMERS AGE AND CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION OF URINARY CALCULI
    RAJU, RVS
    SARADA, B
    SATYANARAYANA, U
    RAO, CN
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1988, 26 (11) : 915 - 916
  • [25] Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones
    Kijvikai, Kittinut
    de la Rosette, J. J. M.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2011, 8 (02) : 81 - 85
  • [26] GEOGRAPHICAL AND HISTORICAL SURVEY OF COMPOSITION OF URINARY STONES
    SUTOR, DJ
    WOOLEY, SE
    ILLINGWORTH, JJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 46 (04): : 393 - 407
  • [27] THE INCIDENCE AND COMPOSITION OF URINARY STONES IN SOUTHERN IRAQ
    ALNAAMA, LM
    SUSAN, LP
    BAQIR, YA
    RASOUL, HA
    ALKHADDAR, MA
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1987, 8 (05) : 456 - 461
  • [28] CORRELATION BETWEEN CAUSES AND COMPOSITION OF URINARY STONES
    OTNES, B
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1983, 17 (01): : 93 - 98
  • [29] CHANGES IN COMPOSITION OF URINARY-TRACT STONES
    HODGKINSON, A
    MARSHALL, RW
    INVESTIGATIVE UROLOGY, 1975, 13 (02): : 131 - 135
  • [30] Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones
    Kittinut Kijvikai
    J. J. M. de la Rosette
    Nature Reviews Urology, 2011, 8 : 81 - 85