Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Prediction of Final Prostate Pathology

被引:109
|
作者
Le, Jesse D. [1 ]
Stephenson, Samuel [4 ]
Brugger, Michelle [4 ]
Lu, David Y. [3 ]
Lieu, Patricia [1 ]
Sonn, Geoffrey A. [6 ]
Natarajan, Shyam [5 ]
Dorey, Frederick J. [1 ]
Huang, Jiaoti [3 ]
Margolis, Daniel J. A. [2 ]
Reiter, Robert E. [1 ]
Marks, Leonard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pathol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Adv Surg & Intervent Technol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2014年 / 192卷 / 05期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; biopsy; prostatectomy; GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; TARGETED BIOPSY; CANCER; GUIDELINES; CARCINOMA; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.094
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We explored the impact of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy on the prediction of final surgical pathology. Materials and Methods: A total of 54 consecutive men undergoing radical prostatectomy at UCLA after fusion biopsy were included in this prospective, institutional review board approved pilot study. Using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion, tissue was obtained from a 12-point systematic grid (mapping biopsy) and from regions of interest detected by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (targeted biopsy). A single radiologist read all magnetic resonance imaging, and a single pathologist independently rereviewed all biopsy and whole mount pathology, blinded to prior interpretation and matched specimen. Gleason score concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy was the primary end point. Results: Mean patient age was 62 years and median prostate specific antigen was 6.2 ng/ml. Final Gleason score at prostatectomy was 6 (13%), 7 (70%) and 8e9 (17%). A tertiary pattern was detected in 17 (31%) men. Of 45 high suspicion (image grade 4-5) magnetic resonance imaging targets 32 (71%) contained prostate cancer. The per core cancer detection rate was 20% by systematic mapping biopsy and 42% by targeted biopsy. The highest Gleason pattern at prostatectomy was detected by systematic mapping biopsy in 54%, targeted biopsy in 54% and a combination in 81% of cases. Overall 17% of cases were upgraded from fusion biopsy to final pathology and 1 (2%) was downgraded. The combination of targeted biopsy and systematic mapping biopsy was needed to obtain the best predictive accuracy. Conclusions: In this pilot study magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy allowed for the prediction of final prostate pathology with greater accuracy than that reported previously using conventional methods (81% vs 40% to 65%). If confirmed, these results will have important clinical implications.
引用
收藏
页码:1367 / 1373
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Editorial Comment to Application of virtual reality in patient explanation of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
    Igarashi, Tatsuo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 472 - 472
  • [22] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Improves but Does Not Replace Standard Template Biopsy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Wang, Shu
    Siddiqui, Mohummad Minhaj
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 202 (05): : 953 - 953
  • [23] Robot-assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted Biopsy
    Lee, Alvin Y. M.
    Chen, Kenneth
    Law, Yan Mee
    Ho, Henry S. S.
    Cheng, Christopher W. S.
    Yuen, John S. P.
    Tay, Kae Jack
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2021, 155 : 46 - 46
  • [24] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Smaller Prostate
    Wu, Shulin
    Dahl, Douglas
    Kim, Michelle
    Lin, Sharron
    Crotty, Rory
    Cornejo, Kristine
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Feldman, Adam
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    [J]. MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2022, 35 (SUPPL 2) : 697 - 698
  • [25] COMPARISON OF SYSTEMATIC 12-CORE PROSTATE BIOPSY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSY TO THE FINAL SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
    Palma-Zamora, Isaac
    Sood, Akshay
    Farah, Guillaume
    Olson, Philip
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Arora, Sohrab
    Jamil, Marcus
    Kovacevic, Natalija
    Yaguchi, Grace
    Keeley, Jacob
    Peabody, James O.
    Rogers, Craig G.
    Menon, Mani
    Dabaja, Ali
    Abdollah, Firas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1238 - E1239
  • [26] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Smaller Prostate
    Wu, Shulin
    Dahl, Douglas
    Kim, Michelle
    Lin, Sharron
    Crotty, Rory
    Cornejo, Kristine
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Feldman, Adam
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    [J]. LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2022, 102 (SUPPL 1) : 697 - 698
  • [27] The Role of Ipsilateral and Contralateral Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men With Unilateral Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Bryk, Darren J.
    Llukani, Elton
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Huang, William C.
    Lepor, Herbert
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2017, 102 : 178 - 182
  • [28] Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy of PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions
    Gosein, Maria
    Pang, Emily
    Chang, Silvia
    Black, Peter
    Goldenberg, Larry
    Harris, Alison
    Yasenjiang, Jason
    Yousefi, Masoud
    [J]. CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2018, 69 (03): : 303 - 310
  • [29] COMPARING THE CANCER DETECTION RATE OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION GUIDED VERSUS COGNITIVE-MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY FOR SMALL PROSTATE LESIONS
    Mare, Anton
    Bergersen, Phil
    Chalasani, Venu
    Goolam, Ahmed
    Dias, Max
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E310 - E310
  • [30] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy: role in diagnosis and management of prostatic cancer
    Scialpi, Michele
    Piscioli, Irene
    Malaspina, Simona
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (04) : 509 - 510