Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Prediction of Final Prostate Pathology

被引:109
|
作者
Le, Jesse D. [1 ]
Stephenson, Samuel [4 ]
Brugger, Michelle [4 ]
Lu, David Y. [3 ]
Lieu, Patricia [1 ]
Sonn, Geoffrey A. [6 ]
Natarajan, Shyam [5 ]
Dorey, Frederick J. [1 ]
Huang, Jiaoti [3 ]
Margolis, Daniel J. A. [2 ]
Reiter, Robert E. [1 ]
Marks, Leonard S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pathol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Adv Surg & Intervent Technol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[6] Stanford Univ, Dept Urol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2014年 / 192卷 / 05期
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; biopsy; prostatectomy; GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; TARGETED BIOPSY; CANCER; GUIDELINES; CARCINOMA; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.094
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We explored the impact of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy on the prediction of final surgical pathology. Materials and Methods: A total of 54 consecutive men undergoing radical prostatectomy at UCLA after fusion biopsy were included in this prospective, institutional review board approved pilot study. Using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion, tissue was obtained from a 12-point systematic grid (mapping biopsy) and from regions of interest detected by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (targeted biopsy). A single radiologist read all magnetic resonance imaging, and a single pathologist independently rereviewed all biopsy and whole mount pathology, blinded to prior interpretation and matched specimen. Gleason score concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy was the primary end point. Results: Mean patient age was 62 years and median prostate specific antigen was 6.2 ng/ml. Final Gleason score at prostatectomy was 6 (13%), 7 (70%) and 8e9 (17%). A tertiary pattern was detected in 17 (31%) men. Of 45 high suspicion (image grade 4-5) magnetic resonance imaging targets 32 (71%) contained prostate cancer. The per core cancer detection rate was 20% by systematic mapping biopsy and 42% by targeted biopsy. The highest Gleason pattern at prostatectomy was detected by systematic mapping biopsy in 54%, targeted biopsy in 54% and a combination in 81% of cases. Overall 17% of cases were upgraded from fusion biopsy to final pathology and 1 (2%) was downgraded. The combination of targeted biopsy and systematic mapping biopsy was needed to obtain the best predictive accuracy. Conclusions: In this pilot study magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion biopsy allowed for the prediction of final prostate pathology with greater accuracy than that reported previously using conventional methods (81% vs 40% to 65%). If confirmed, these results will have important clinical implications.
引用
收藏
页码:1367 / 1373
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion
    Bockholt, Nathan
    Marks, Leonard S.
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2015, 17 (06) : 870 - 873
  • [2] Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy - a new era of prostate cancer diagnosis
    Lai, T. C. T.
    Ma, W. K.
    Lam, A. K. C.
    Lam, A. C. S.
    Tsang, C. F.
    Lam, W.
    Ho, B. S. H.
    Ng, A. T. L.
    Tsu, J. H. L.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 6 - 6
  • [3] 912 Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Prostate Biopsy Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy in The Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Bhojwani, A.
    Desai, C.
    Ehsanullah, S. A.
    Shahzad, S. A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (SUPPL 2)
  • [4] Target detection: Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsy
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2014, 32 (06) : 903 - 911
  • [5] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy During Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance
    Tran, Geraldine N.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (02) : 275 - 281
  • [6] Role of Core Number and Location in Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy
    Lu, Amanda Jane
    Syed, Jamil S.
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Hsiang, Walter Robert
    Nguyen, Kevin A.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Sprenkle, Preston C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 76 (01) : 14 - 17
  • [7] Application of virtual reality in patient explanation of magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Taniguchi, Naoji
    Moriyama, Shingo
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 471 - 472
  • [8] INCREASED PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION BIOPSY IN MEN REQUIRING REPEAT BIOPSY
    Narayanan, Ramkishen
    Chevli, K. Kent
    Cipolla, David
    Geary, William
    Suraf, Margaret
    Duff, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E1080 - E1080
  • [9] HOW ACCURATELY DOES MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-ULTRASOUND FUSION BIOPSY PREDICT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PATHOLOGY?
    Patel, Neal A.
    Kasabwala, Khushabu
    Lizza, Eliza
    Herman, Michael
    Tewari, Ashutosh
    Barbieri, Chris
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04): : E814 - E815
  • [10] Prostate cancer risk stratification using magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion vs systematic prostate biopsy
    Khajir, Ghazal
    Press, Benjamin
    Lokeshwar, Soum
    Ghabili, Kamyar
    Rahman, Syed
    Gardezi, Mursal
    Washington, Samuel
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Sprenkle, Preston
    Leapman, Michael S.
    [J]. JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM, 2023, 7 (06)