Pharmacy-based interventions for initiating effective contraception following the use of emergency contraception: a pilot study

被引:29
|
作者
Michie, L. [1 ,2 ]
Cameron, S. T. [1 ,2 ]
Glasier, A. [1 ,3 ]
Larke, N. [3 ]
Muir, A. [4 ]
Lorimer, A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Reprod & Dev Sci, Edinburgh EH16 5SU, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Chalmers Sexual Hlth Ctr, Edinburgh EH3 9ES, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London WC1E 7HT, England
[4] NHS Lothian, Dept Hlth & Hlth Policy, Edinburgh EH1 3EG, Midlothian, Scotland
[5] Royal Edinburgh & Associated Hosp, Dept Pharm, Edinburgh EH10 5HF, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Morning-after pill; Levonelle; Quick-start; LARC; POP; CHLAMYDIA; HISTORY; WORTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: In Scotland most women get emergency contraception (EC) from pharmacies. Pharmacists currently cannot provide effective ongoing contraception after EC. In this pilot study, we aimed to determine the feasibility of a larger study designed to ascertain if pharmacy-based interventions can increase the uptake of effective contraception after EC. Study design: This is a pilot study of women presenting for levonorgestrel EC to community pharmacies in Edinburgh, UK, in 2012. Pharmacies were cluster randomized to provide either standard care or one of two interventions: (a) one packet of progestogen-only pills (POPs), giving women 1 month to arrange ongoing contraception; (b) invitation to present the empty EC packet to a family planning clinic (FPC) for contraceptive advice (rapid access). Results: One hundred sixty-eight women were recruited from 11 pharmacies to POP (n=56), rapid access (n=58) and standard care (N=54) groups, respectively. Telephone follow-up was conducted successfully in 102 women (61%) 6-8 weeks later to determine current contraceptive use. In the POP arm, 35/39 (90%) women used the pills provided, and 9/28 women (32%) in the rapid access arm attended the FPC. The proportion of women using effective contraception at follow-up was significantly greater in both POP [56% (22/39), p=<0.001] and rapid access [52% (13/25), p=0.006] groups compared to standard care [16% (5/31)]. The relative probability of a woman using an effective method of contraception versus barrier/no method, after use of EC, was 3.13 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.90-5.13] in the POP group and 2.57 (95% CI, 1.55-4.27) in the rapid access group. Conclusions: This promising pilot study suggests that simple pharmacy-based interventions may increase the uptake of effective contraception after EC. A larger study is required to provide further validation of these findings. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 453
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Characteristics associated with emergency contraception use by family planning patients: A prospective cohort study
    Whittaker, Paul G.
    Berger, Matthew
    Armstrong, Kay A.
    Felice, Toni L.
    Adams, Janet
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2007, 39 (03) : 158 - 166
  • [42] Trends in the use of emergency contraception: An epidemiological study in Barcelona, Spain (1994-2002)
    Checa, MA
    Pascual, J
    Robles, A
    Carreras, R
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 70 (03) : 199 - 201
  • [43] Knowledge and counseling preferences of the public and pharmacy staff on emergency contraception: Results of a cross-sectional study in Belgium
    Ceulemans, Michael
    Willekens, Julie
    Cavens, Laura
    De Wulf, Isabelle
    Peeters, Laurence
    Roose, Nele
    Foulon, Veerle
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2022, 115 : 27 - 30
  • [44] Evaluation of knowledge and attitude of pharmacist and pharmacy technicians on emergency contraception method in Istanbul, Turkey: A simulated patient study
    Uzun, Gul Duygu
    Sancar, Mesut
    Okuyan, Betul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PHARMACY, 2019, 23 (03): : 395 - 402
  • [45] Post-marketing surveillance using pharmacy-based cohorts: results of a pilot study
    Louik, C
    Mitchell, AA
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 14 (05) : 289 - 295
  • [46] Does meloxicam increase the incidence of anovulation induced by single administration of levonorgestrel in emergency contraception?: A pilot study
    Massai, M. R.
    Forcelledo, M. L.
    Brache, V.
    Tejada, A. S.
    Salvatierra, A. M.
    Reyes, M. V.
    Alvarez, F.
    Faundes, A.
    Croxatto, H. B.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (02) : 434 - 439
  • [47] Postpartum Contraception use in Somali Women: A Population-Based Study
    Cope, Adela
    Mara, Kristin
    Weaver, Amy
    Casey, Petra
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 : 64S - 64S
  • [48] Use of a pharmacy-based GP video consultation service: a mixed methods study
    Parsons, Joanne
    Rahman, Sameur
    Bryce, Carol
    Atherton, Helen
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2023, 40 (02) : 241 - 247
  • [49] A nonhomional model for emergency contraception: prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor effects on luteal function and lifespan, a pilot study
    Edelman, Alison B.
    Jensen, Jeffrey T.
    Hennebold, Jon D.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 81 (06) : 496 - 500
  • [50] The Feasibility of Pharmacy-Based Naloxone Distribution Interventions: A Qualitative Study With Injection Drug Users and Pharmacy Staff in Rhode Island
    Zaller, Nickolas D.
    Yokell, Michael A.
    Green, Traci Craig
    Gaggin, Julia
    Case, Patricia
    [J]. SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2013, 48 (08) : 590 - 599