Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results

被引:37
|
作者
Qvist, V
Manscher, E
Teglers, PT
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Sch Dent, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Cariol & Endodont, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Publ Dent Hlth Serv, Gladsaxe, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Sch Oral Hlth Care, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
clinical trial; cariostatic effects; dental restorations; glass ionomer cement; long-term behaviour; pedodontics; resin modified glass ionomer;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2004.01.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. To compare the longevity and cariostatic effects of resin-modified (RMGIC) and conventional glass ionomer (GIC) restorations in primary teeth in the Danish Public Dental Health Service. Methods. The sample consisted of 543 RMGIC and 451 GIC restorations in all cavity types in the primary teeth of 640 children, aged 3.0-17.5 years. The restorations were in contact with 480 unrestored surfaces. The restorations and the adjacent surfaces were followed until exfoliation/extraction of the teeth, repair/replacement of restorations or operative treatment of adjacent surfaces. Survival analyses supplied with multivariate analyses were performed to assess the influence of different factors on the longevity of restorations, occurrence of prevalent failures, and caries treatment of adjacent surfaces. Results. After 8 years, 2% of the restorations were still in function and 37% of the RMGIC and 44% of the GIC restorations had been repaired or replaced. Fracture and loss of retention predominated as the reasons for failure of restorations in both materials. The 50% survival time for restorations was 55 months for RMGIC and 48 months for GIC (p = 0.01). Progression of caries lesions required operative treatment on 20% of the surfaces in contact with RMGIC and on 14% of surfaces adjacent to GIC restorations. The 75% survival time was 35 months for surfaces in contact with both materials (p = 0.37). Conclusions. RMGIC and GIC showed similar cariostatic effects on restored teeth and adjacent tooth surfaces, but RMGIC should be preferred for class 11 restorations in the primary dentition, and class III/V restorations should be made in GIC due to enhanced longevity. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:285 / 294
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Er:YAG laser on microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
    Chinelatti, MA
    Chimello, DT
    Ramos, RP
    Pecora, JD
    Dibb, RGP
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : B181 - B181
  • [32] Solubility of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement
    Quackenbush, BM
    Donly, KJ
    Croll, TP
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 1998, 65 (05): : 310 - +
  • [33] Cytotoxicity of resin-modified glass ionomer cements
    Chen, RCS
    Chiou, LR
    Chen, KH
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 812 - 812
  • [34] Evaluation of the Effect of Nanographene Oxide on Microleakage of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer
    Sharafeddin, Farahnaz
    Ghodrati, Parisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 2023
  • [35] Clinical evaluation of a conventional versus a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Avila, G
    Navarro, MFD
    Palma, RG
    Franco, EB
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 381 - 381
  • [36] Evaluation in vitro of the marginal infiltration in deciduous teeth restorations with resin-modified glass ionomer cements, in terms of the treatment of the enamel and dentin
    Castro, SL
    Leal, AMA
    Pansani, CA
    Lima, FCBA
    Lonffredo, LCM
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1047 - 1047
  • [37] Orthodontic band retention using microetching and resin-modified glass ionomer and conventional glass ionomer cements.
    Paras, T
    Dhuru, V
    Ferguson, D
    Gannon, M
    Niland, P
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 28 - 28
  • [38] In vitro evaluation of microleakage in primary teeth restored with three adhesive materials: ACTIVA™, composite resin, and resin-modified glass ionomer
    A. I. Amaireh
    S. H. Al-Jundi
    H. A. Alshraideh
    European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 2019, 20 : 359 - 367
  • [39] In vitro evaluation of microleakage in primary teeth restored with three adhesive materials: ACTIVA™, composite resin, and resin-modified glass ionomer
    Amaireh, A., I
    Al-Jundi, S. H.
    Alshraideh, H. A.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 20 (04) : 359 - 367
  • [40] In vitro caries inhibition effects by conventional and resin modified glass ionomer restorations
    Tam, LE
    Chan, GPL
    Yim, D
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1997, 22 (01) : 4 - 14