Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology

被引:36
|
作者
Jung, Yong Wook [1 ]
Kim, Sang Wun [1 ]
Kim, Young Tae [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
Minimal surgical procedure; Endometrial neoplasm; Cervical neoplasm; Laparoscopic surgery; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; MULTIINSTITUTIONAL EXPERIENCE; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; CERVICAL-CANCER; FUTURE; OBESE;
D O I
10.3802/jgo.2009.20.3.137
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Two innovative approaches in minimally invasive surgery that have been introduced recently are the da Vinci robotic platform and single port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS). Robotic surgery has many advantages such as 3-dimensional view, the wrist like motion of the robotic arm and ergonomically comfortable position for the surgeon. Numerous literatures have demonstrated the feasibility of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. However, further research should be performed to demonstrate the superiority of robotic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopy. Additionally, cost reduction of robotic surgery is needed to adopt robotic surgery into gynecologic oncology worldwide. SPL.S has several possible benefits including reduced operative complications, reduced postoperative pain, and better cosmetic results compared to conventional laparoscopy. Although several authors have indicated that SPLS is a feasible approach for gynecologic surgery, there have been few reports demonstrating the potential advantages over conventional laparoscopy. Moreover, technical difficulties of SPLS still exist. Therefore, the advantages of a single port approach compared to conventional laparoscope should be evaluated with comparative study, and further technologic development for SPLS is also needed. These two progressive technologies take the lead in the development of MIS and further studies should be performed to evaluate the benefits of robot surgery and SPLS.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 144
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Robotic Assisted Single Incision Ileocolic Resection Using Standard Robotic Instrumentation and a Single Incision Laparoscopy Surgery (SILS) Port
    Hrabe, Jennifer
    Cyr, Anthony R.
    Cromwell, John W.
    Byrn, John
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 144 (05) : S1056 - S1056
  • [42] Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery
    Remzi, F. H.
    Kirat, H. T.
    Kaouk, J. H.
    Geisler, D. P.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 10 (08) : 823 - 826
  • [43] Single Port Access Laparoscopy: A Review of the Most Recent Development in Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Back, M.
    Nimmesgern, T.
    Langwieler, T. E.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2010, 135 (02): : 183 - 187
  • [44] Recent progress of robotic head and neck surgery using a flexible single port robotic system
    Park, Young Min
    Choi, Eun Chang
    Kim, Se-Heon
    Koh, Yoon Woo
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (02) : 353 - 360
  • [45] Recent progress of robotic head and neck surgery using a flexible single port robotic system
    Young Min Park
    Eun Chang Choi
    Se-Heon Kim
    Yoon Woo Koh
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 353 - 360
  • [46] Two-Port Access Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology
    Lee, Maria
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    Kim, Young Tae
    Kim, Sang Wun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2013, 23 (05) : 935 - 942
  • [47] Robotic surgery in urology: Recent advances
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Nathan, Senthil
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 10 (04) : 385 - 387
  • [48] Single Port Robotic Surgery in Urology
    Alaina Garbens
    Tara Morgan
    Jeffrey A. Cadeddu
    Current Urology Reports, 2021, 22
  • [49] Single Port Robotic Surgery in Urology
    Garbens, Alaina
    Morgan, Tara
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 22 (04)
  • [50] SINGLE PORT TRANSUMBILICAL ROBOTIC SURGERY
    Goel, Raj K.
    White, Wesley M.
    Stein, Robert J.
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    Pascal-Haber, Georges
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 427 - 428