INTENT RECOGNITION IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS: COW HERDING

被引:0
|
作者
Ahmad, Najla [1 ]
Agah, Arvin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
Multi-agent systems; plan recognition; intent recognition; distributed systems; cooperative agents;
D O I
10.1142/S021800141459006X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In a multi-agent system, an agent may utilize its idle time to assist other agents in the system. Intent recognition is proposed to accomplish this with minimal communication. An agent performing recognition observes the tasks other agents are performing and, unlike the much studied field of plan recognition, the overall intent of an agent is recognized instead of a specific plan. The observing agent may use capabilities that it has not observed. A conceptual framework is proposed for intent recognition systems. An implementation of the conceptual framework is tested and evaluated. We hypothesize that using intent recognition in a multi-agent system increases utility (where utility is domain specific) and decreases the amount of communication. We test our hypotheses using the domain of Cow Herding, where agents attempt to herd cow agents into team corrals. A set of metrics, including task time and number of communications, is used to compare the performance of plan recognition and intent recognition. In our results, we find that intent recognition agents communicate fewer times than plan recognition agents. In addition, unlike plan recognition, when agents use the novel approach of intent recognition, they select unobserved actions to perform. Intent recognition agents were also able to outperform plan recognition agents by consistently scoring more points in the Cow Herding domain. This research shows that under certain conditions, an intent recognition system is more efficient than a plan recognition system. The advantage of intent recognition over plan recognition becomes more apparent in complex domains.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS FOR QUADCOPTERS
    Carney, Richard
    Chyba, Monique
    Gray, Chris
    Wilkens, George
    Shanbrom, Corey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOMETRIC MECHANICS, 2022, 14 (01): : 1 - 28
  • [32] Evolutionary multi-agent systems
    Byrski, Aleksander
    Drezewski, Rafal
    Siwik, Leszek
    Kisiel-Dorohinicki, Marek
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2015, 30 (02): : 171 - 186
  • [33] Modeling multi-agent systems
    da Silva, Viviane Torres
    de Lucena, Carlos J. P.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2007, 50 (05) : 103 - 108
  • [34] An introduction to multi-agent systems
    Robertson, DA
    [J]. JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2004, 7 (03):
  • [35] Fairness in multi-agent systems
    Dejong, Steven
    Tuyls, Karl
    Verbeeck, Katja
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2008, 23 (02): : 153 - 180
  • [36] Inconsistency in Multi-Agent Systems
    Zhang, Du
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ISKE 2011), 2011, 122 : 401 - 412
  • [37] On stabilizability of multi-agent systems
    Sun, Yinshuang
    Ji, Zhijian
    Liu, Yungang
    Lin, Chong
    [J]. AUTOMATICA, 2022, 144
  • [38] Minimal multi-agent systems
    Van Aeken, F
    Demazeau, Y
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 471 - 472
  • [39] Teams in multi-agent systems
    Jarvis, Bevan
    Jarvis, Dennis
    Jain, Lakhmi
    [J]. INTELLIGENT INFORMATION PROCESSING III, 2006, 228 : 1 - +
  • [40] Engineering multi-agent systems
    Artz, D
    Cicirello, VA
    Regli, WC
    Kam, M
    [J]. 2004 IEEE 1ST SYMPOSIUM ON MULTI-AGENT SECURITY & SURVIVABILITY, 2004, : 100 - 107