Screening of nanoparticulate delivery systems for the photodetection of cancer in a simple and cost-effective model

被引:13
|
作者
Zeisser-Labouebe, Magali [1 ]
Delie, Florence [1 ]
Gurny, Robert [1 ]
Lange, Norbert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Univ Geneva, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Sch Pharmaceut & Biopharmaceut, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
关键词
cancer; chorioallantoic membrane; drug-delivery system; fluorescence photodetection; hypericin; in vivo; nanoparticle; screening; CHICK CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE; IN-VIVO MODEL; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; PHOTOTHROMBIC ACTIVITY; VASCULAR-PERMEABILITY; LOADED NANOPARTICLES; TUMOR; EXTRAVASATION; HYPERICIN; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.2217/17435889.4.2.135
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims: In urology, fluorescence-based imaging methods have been proven to significantly improve the detection of small, barely visible tumors and reduce the recurrence rate. Under ethical and economical pressure, new effective screening systems have to be developed to exploit and assess novel strategies for fluorescence photodetection in other areas. For this purpose, the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the developing chick embryo is an attractive alternative model to the mammalian models. Materials & methods: Hypericin encapsulated into nanoparticles for the photodetection of ovarian metastases was evaluated in the CAM model with respect to vascular extravazation and tumor targeting and compared with free drug following intravenous administration. Results: To validate the CAM model as a valuable screening system for photodetection of cancer, we drew a comparison with results obtained on a conventional rodent model. Conclusion: Rodent and CAM models led to the same conclusion regarding the benefits of nanoencapsulation to improve selective accumulation of drug in ovarian micrometastases.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 143
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mathematical models and cost-effective screening strategies for colorectal cancer
    Smith, Robert A.
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (12) : 1283 - 1284
  • [32] Recent diagnostic procedures for colorectal cancer screening: Are they cost-effective?
    Arafa, Mostafa Ahmed
    Farhat, Karim Hamda
    ARAB JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 18 (03) : 136 - 139
  • [33] Screening high risk patients for bladder cancer is cost-effective
    Lotan, Y
    Svatek, RS
    Sagalowsky, AI
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 285 - 285
  • [34] Screening for prostate cancer is neither appropriate nor cost-effective
    Albertsen, PC
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 23 (04) : 521 - +
  • [35] Breast cancer screening by mammography in Norway. Is it cost-effective?
    Norum, J
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 (02) : 197 - 203
  • [36] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening for Breast Cancer: It Is Cost-effective!
    Slanetz, Priscilla J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 297 (01) : 49 - 50
  • [37] Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening - An international review
    Fahs, MC
    Plichta, SB
    Mandelblatt, JS
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1996, 9 (03) : 211 - 230
  • [38] CHARACTERISTICS OF A COST-EFFECTIVE BLOOD TEST FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING
    de Lima, Pedro Nascimento
    Van den Puttelaar, Rosita
    Knudsen, Amy B.
    Hahn, Anne I.
    Collier, Nicholson
    Ozik, Jonathan
    Escudero, Fernando Alarid
    Kuntz, Karen M.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Inadomi, John M.
    Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Iris
    Rutter, Carolyn M.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 166 (05) : S219 - S220
  • [39] DESIGN EFFECTIVE COST-EFFECTIVE SYSTEMS
    LEE, CM
    WATER & WASTES ENGINEERING, 1978, 15 (07): : 66 - &
  • [40] Nanoparticulate RNA delivery systems in cancer
    Sharma, Ankur
    Jha, Niraj Kumar
    Dahiya, Kajal
    Singh, Vivek Kumar
    Chaurasiya, Kundan
    Jha, Aditya Narayan
    Jha, Saurabh Kumar
    Mishra, Prabhu Chandra
    Dholpuria, Sunny
    Astya, Rani
    Nand, Parma
    Kumar, Amit
    Ruokolainen, Janne
    Kesari, Kavindra Kumar
    CANCER REPORTS, 2020, 3 (05)