Screening of nanoparticulate delivery systems for the photodetection of cancer in a simple and cost-effective model

被引:13
|
作者
Zeisser-Labouebe, Magali [1 ]
Delie, Florence [1 ]
Gurny, Robert [1 ]
Lange, Norbert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne, Univ Geneva, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Sch Pharmaceut & Biopharmaceut, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
关键词
cancer; chorioallantoic membrane; drug-delivery system; fluorescence photodetection; hypericin; in vivo; nanoparticle; screening; CHICK CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE; IN-VIVO MODEL; PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY; PHOTOTHROMBIC ACTIVITY; VASCULAR-PERMEABILITY; LOADED NANOPARTICLES; TUMOR; EXTRAVASATION; HYPERICIN; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.2217/17435889.4.2.135
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims: In urology, fluorescence-based imaging methods have been proven to significantly improve the detection of small, barely visible tumors and reduce the recurrence rate. Under ethical and economical pressure, new effective screening systems have to be developed to exploit and assess novel strategies for fluorescence photodetection in other areas. For this purpose, the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) of the developing chick embryo is an attractive alternative model to the mammalian models. Materials & methods: Hypericin encapsulated into nanoparticles for the photodetection of ovarian metastases was evaluated in the CAM model with respect to vascular extravazation and tumor targeting and compared with free drug following intravenous administration. Results: To validate the CAM model as a valuable screening system for photodetection of cancer, we drew a comparison with results obtained on a conventional rodent model. Conclusion: Rodent and CAM models led to the same conclusion regarding the benefits of nanoencapsulation to improve selective accumulation of drug in ovarian micrometastases.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 143
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SCREENING FOR CANCER - IS IT COST-EFFECTIVE
    SCHWARTZ, MK
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1993, 39 (11B) : 2397 - 2403
  • [2] Is population screening for colorectal cancer cost-effective?
    Michael Pignone
    Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2005, 2 : 288 - 289
  • [3] Screening for lung cancer: Can it be cost-effective?
    Miettinen, OS
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2000, 162 (10) : 1431 - 1436
  • [4] Is population screening for colorectal cancer cost-effective?
    Pignone, M
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 2 (07): : 288 - 289
  • [5] Is mass screening for breast cancer cost-effective?
    deKoning, HJ
    Coebergh, JWW
    vanDongen, JA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (11) : 1835 - 1839
  • [6] Breast cancer screening; cost-effective in practice?
    de Koning, HJ
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2000, 33 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [7] IS SCREENING FOR BREAST-CANCER COST-EFFECTIVE
    MUSHLIN, AI
    FINTOR, L
    CANCER, 1992, 69 (07) : 1957 - 1962
  • [8] Cervical Cancer Screening Program of Parana:: Cost-effective model in a developing country
    Torres, LFB
    Werner, B
    Totsugui, J
    Collaço, LM
    Araújo, SR
    Huçulak, M
    Boza, EJ
    Fischer, RM
    de Laat, L
    Sobbania, LC
    Raggio, A
    DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2003, 29 (01) : 49 - 54
  • [9] COST-EFFECTIVE SCREENING STRATEGIES FOR COLORECTAL-CANCER
    WHYNES, DK
    WALKER, AR
    HARDCASTLE, JD
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1992, 14 (01): : 43 - 49
  • [10] CT screening for lung cancer shown to be cost-effective
    Granovetter, Michael
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (12): : 973 - 973