Scientific lessons from the first influenza pandemic of the 20th century

被引:21
|
作者
Oxford, J. S.
Lambkin, R.
Elliot, A.
Daniels, R.
Sefton, A.
Gill, D.
机构
[1] Retroscreen Virol Ltd, Ctr Infect Dis, Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, London E1 4NS, England
[2] Natl Inst Med Res, London NW7, England
关键词
pandemic; reproductive number; oseltamivir; influenza;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.101
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Re-analysis of the influenza pandemic of 1918 has given reassurance about a rather low reproductive number (R-o), a prolonged herald wave of virus and that the skewed mortality towards the young adult could be a singularly unique event dependent upon previous infection history, perhaps not to be repeated in a future pandemic. Over 99% of those who contracted the virus survived, in spite of the absence of antivirals, vaccine and antibiotics for the secondary bacteria infections which probably accounted for one-third of the 50 million deaths. Therefore, in spite of a three-fold population increase since 1918 and 100 thousand plane journeys daily, judicious and careful planning together with a stockpile of antiviral drugs, oseltamivir, zanamivir and M2 blockers and a generic H5N1 vaccine, and application of hygiene would be expected to reduce mortality in a new pandemic, to figures significantly less than 1918. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:6742 / 6746
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条