Loudness and Satisfaction Ratings for Hearing Aid Users

被引:8
|
作者
Blamey, Peter J. [1 ]
Martin, Lois F. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dynam Hearing Pty Ltd, Richmond, Vic 3121, Australia
关键词
Comfort; hearing aid; loudness; satisfaction; EXPERIENCED USERS; MODEL; COMPRESSION; SPEECH;
D O I
10.3766/jaaa.20.4.7
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Hearing aids amplify low-intensity sounds to make them audible while keeping high-intensity sounds at an acceptable loudness for listeners with impaired hearing. Purpose: The purpose of this analysis was to assess loudness and satisfaction at the same time using a combined loudness and satisfaction questionnaire to rate 18 everyday environmental sounds. Research Design: Ten sets of data from four studies, covering three conditions, were analyzed. The three conditions were unaided, wide dynamic range compression (WDRC), and adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO). In total, there were 61 subjects giving over 3,000 pairs of ratings for loudness and satisfaction. Results: The analysis found a strong relationship between loudness and satisfaction ratings for this set of listeners and conditions. The maximum satisfaction ratings corresponded to sounds with "comfortable" loudness ratings. Satisfaction was lowest for sounds that were "uncomfortably loud." Sounds that were very soft or inaudible also received low satisfaction ratings unless the sounds were expected to be soft, such as the sound of one's own breathing. Conclusions: Hearing aid fittings that place most sounds at a comfortable level are likely to be more satisfactory than hearing aid fittings that produce more sounds close to hearing thresholds or discomfort levels. Aided conditions gave higher loudness and satisfaction ratings than the unaided condition, and the ADRO hearing aids gave significantly higher satisfaction ratings than the WDRC hearing aids.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 282
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring Factors Enabling Hearing Aid Usage: Perspectives of Hearing Aid Users and Audiologists
    Jose, Maria
    Gundmi, Archana
    Bhargavi, P. G.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2024, 76 (01) : 523 - 529
  • [32] Exploring Factors Enabling Hearing Aid Usage: Perspectives of Hearing Aid Users and Audiologists
    Maria Jose
    Archana Gundmi
    P G Bhargavi
    Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 2024, 76 : 523 - 529
  • [33] Effects of Bilateral Hearing Aid Use on Balance in Experienced Adult Hearing Aid Users
    McDaniel, D. Mike
    Motts, Susan D.
    Neeley, Richard A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2018, 27 (01) : 121 - 125
  • [34] Consumer Ratings of the Most Desirable Hearing Aid Attributes
    Manchaiah, Vinaya
    Picou, Erin M.
    Bailey, Abram
    Rodrigo, Hansapani
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (08) : 537 - 546
  • [35] Evaluation of hearing training with familiar voices for hearing aid users
    Estendorfer, Nina
    Peters, Carla
    SPRACHE-STIMME-GEHOR, 2023, 47 (03): : 120 - 120
  • [36] A comparison of two measures of hearing aid satisfaction in a group of elderly hearing aid wearers
    Humes, LE
    Wilson, DL
    Humes, L
    Barlow, NN
    Garner, CB
    Amos, N
    EAR AND HEARING, 2002, 23 (05): : 422 - 427
  • [37] LOUDNESS MATCHING OF SIGNALS SPECTRALLY SHAPED BY A SIMULATED HEARING-AID
    PUNCH, J
    RAKERD, B
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1993, 36 (02): : 357 - 364
  • [38] High performance digital hearing aid processor with psychoacoustic loudness correction
    Park, YC
    Lee, HS
    Kim, YC
    Jang, YB
    Park, SI
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, 1997 DIGEST OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, 1997, : 312 - 313
  • [39] Uncomfortable loudness levels in experienced unilateral and bilateral hearing aid users: Evidence of adaptive plasticity following asymmetrical sensory input?
    Hamilton, Ann-Marie
    Munro, Kevin J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2010, 49 (09) : 667 - 671
  • [40] SURVEY OF BINAURAL HEARING-AID USERS
    BROOKS, DN
    BULMER, D
    EAR AND HEARING, 1981, 2 (05): : 220 - 224