INTEROPERABILITY AND DEMOCRACY: A POLITICAL BASIS FOR OPEN DOCUMENT STANDARDS

被引:0
|
作者
DeNardis, Laura [1 ]
Tami, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Law, Informat Soc Project, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper employs democratic theory as a method of inquiry into the political implications of openness in information and communication technology (ICT) standards. Our account describes four ways in which ICT standards have political implications in democratic societies: standards can have implications for other democratic processes; standards can affect the broader social conditions relevant to democracy; the content and material implications of standards can themselves constitute substantive political issues; and lastly, the internal processes of standards-setting can be viewed politically. After providing examples of these political implications, we examine various conceptions of openness in ICT standards and describe a maximal definition of openness as a conceptual pole that anchors one end of the spectrum of potential standards policy options. We then develop some guidelines as to the contexts in which democratic values require a greater degree of openness in both the substance of technical standards and their development. In particular, we examine the function of documents and document formats in democratic governments and suggest that movements toward open document standards are highly beneficial in democratic societies.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 173
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An evaluation and selection framework for interoperability standards
    Mykkaenen, J. A.
    Tuomainen, M. P.
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 50 (03) : 176 - 197
  • [42] Interoperability of standards to support application integration
    delaHostria, E
    [J]. ENTERPRISE INTER- AND INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL INTEGRATION: BUILDING INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS, 2003, 108 : 283 - 294
  • [43] Standards for enabling health informatics interoperability
    Engel, Kjeld
    Blobel, Bernd
    Pharow, Peter
    [J]. UBIQUITY: TECHNOLOGIES FOR BETTER HEALTH IN AGING SOCIETIES, 2006, 124 : 145 - +
  • [44] Opening standards: The global politics of interoperability
    Chawner, Brenda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (04): : 868 - 870
  • [45] Groups gather to push interoperability standards
    不详
    [J]. INTECH, 2004, 51 (03) : 27 - 27
  • [46] Raising standards: Digital interoperability and DICOM
    Farman, AG
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2005, 99 (05): : 525 - 526
  • [47] Assessing interoperability in emergency management standards
    Pack, Derik
    Coleman, Clayton
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS IEEE SOUTHEASTCON 2008, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 334 - 339
  • [48] A Review of Interoperability Standards for Industry 4.0
    Burns, Thomas
    Cosgrove, John
    Doyle, Frank
    [J]. 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING (FAIM 2019): BEYOND INDUSTRY 4.0: INDUSTRIAL ADVANCES, ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2019, 38 : 646 - 653
  • [49] Digital imaging standards and system interoperability
    Balis, UJ
    [J]. CLINICS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1997, 17 (02) : 315 - &
  • [50] Advanced Transportation Controller Standards and Interoperability
    Miller, Dave
    [J]. ITE JOURNAL-INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS, 2010, 80 (05): : 46 - 49