Joint stability after canine cranial cruciate ligament graft reconstruction varies among femoral fixation sites

被引:6
|
作者
Ho-Eckart, Louisa K. [1 ,4 ]
Seki, Masahiro [1 ,5 ]
Luizza, Lindsey [2 ]
Kearney, Michael T. [3 ]
Lopez, Mandi J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Vet Med, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Lab Equine & Comparat Orthoped Res, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans Hlth Sci Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Vet Med, Stat Serv Unit, Dept Pathobiol Sci, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Clin Sci, Ames, IA USA
[5] Anim Laser Ctr, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
关键词
PLATEAU LEVELING OSTEOTOMY; 3 SURGICAL TECHNIQUES; DEFICIENT STIFLE; PATELLAR TENDON; DOUBLE-BUNDLE; EXTRACAPSULAR STABILIZATION; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; TUNNEL PLACEMENT; HAMSTRING TENDON;
D O I
10.1111/vsu.12609
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Objective: To quantify stability in cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) deficient canine stifles with hamstring grafts affixed at 3 femoral locations. Study Design: Canine stifle motion study using a multi-cohort, repeated measures design. Sample Population: 27 canine cadaver stifles. Methods: Hamstring grafts (HG) were affixed at the gracilis-semitendinosus insertion and on the lateral femur (1) proximal trochlear ridge (TR), (2) craniodistal to fabella (F), or (3) condyle center (CC). Total, cranial, and caudal tibial translation and total, medial, and lateral angular displacement, with and without translational load, were quantified with the CrCL intact, transected, and reconstructed. Angular displacement was quantified from points on the distal femur and proximal tibia. Graft strain was calculated from tissue displacement measured at joint angles of 30 degrees, 60 degrees, 90 degrees, and 120 degrees. Results: Tibial translation was lowest in F constructs, which also achieved the least difference in tibial translation from intact stifles. Tibial translation was lower in intact stifles than in CrCL transected or reconstructed stifles. Less angular displacement of the proximal tibia was detected in the medial than in the lateral direction, and tibial displacement was lower in the cranial than the caudal direction. Angular displacement was lowest in the F treatment group. F constructs had the lowest graft strain at joint angles greater than 30 degrees(.) Conclusions: Femoral fixation of a canine hamstring graft craniodistal to the lateral fabella conferred the best joint stability and lowest graft strain in vitro. No fixation method restored joint stability of the intact CrCL.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 225
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Functional Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - Comparison of Two Graft Fixation Techniques in the Femoral Tunnel
    Vijayan, S.
    Cherukuri, S. M.
    Kulkarni, M. S.
    Naik, M. A.
    Shetty, S.
    Bhat, V
    Murali, S. D.
    Rao, S. K.
    MLTJ-MUSCLES LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (01): : 62 - 68
  • [22] Knee stability and graft function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - A comparison of a lateral and an anatomical femoral tunnel placement
    Yamamoto, Y
    Hsu, WH
    Woo, SLY
    Van Scyoc, AH
    Takakura, Y
    Debski, RE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (08): : 1825 - 1832
  • [23] Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Aperture Femoral Fixation
    Mutnal, Amar
    Leo, Brian M.
    Vargas, Luis
    Colbrunn, Robb W.
    Butler, Robert S.
    Uribe, John W.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [24] Hamstring graft technique for stabilization of canine cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifles
    Lopez, MJ
    Markel, MD
    Kalscheur, V
    Lu, Y
    Manley, PA
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2003, 32 (04) : 390 - 401
  • [25] The fixation strength of six hamstring tendon graft fixation devices in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -: Part I:: Femoral site
    Kousa, P
    Järvinen, TLN
    Vihavainen, M
    Kannus, P
    Järvinen, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (02): : 174 - 181
  • [26] The effects of femoral graft placement on in vivo knee kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Abebe, E. S.
    Utturkar, G. M.
    Taylor, D. C.
    Spritzer, C. E.
    Kim, J. P.
    Moorman, C. T., III
    Garrett, W. E.
    DeFrate, L. E.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2011, 44 (05) : 924 - 929
  • [27] Graft size after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Daniel Hensler
    Motoko Miyawaki
    Kenneth D. Illingworth
    Carola F. van Eck
    Freddie H. Fu
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014, 22 : 995 - 1001
  • [28] Graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Graewert, Stephanie
    PHYSIKALISCHE MEDIZIN REHABILITATIONSMEDIZIN KURORTMEDIZIN, 2024, 34 (03) : 127 - 127
  • [29] Graft remodeling and ligamentization after cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Scheffler, S. U.
    Unterhauser, F. N.
    Weiler, A.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2008, 16 (09) : 834 - 842
  • [30] Graft placement after the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:: a new method to evaluate the femoral and tibial placements of the graft
    Järvelä, T
    Paakkala, T
    Järvelä, K
    Kannus, P
    Järvinen, M
    KNEE, 2001, 8 (03): : 219 - 227