Environmental efficiency of disaggregated energy R&D expenditures in OECD: a bootstrap DEA approach

被引:45
|
作者
Kocak, Emrah [1 ]
Kinaci, Harun [2 ]
Shehzad, Khurram [3 ]
机构
[1] Erciyes Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Econ, TR-38039 Melikgazi Kayseri, Turkey
[2] Erciyes Univ, Fac Econ & Adm Sci, Dept Business Adm, TR-38039 Melikgazi Kayseri, Turkey
[3] Southeast Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Sustainable environment; Environmental efficiency; Energy R& D expenditures; CO2; emissions; Bootstrap DEA; CO2 EMISSIONS REDUCTION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; INNOVATION; IMPACT; PERFORMANCE; INVESTMENT; ECONOMY; DEMAND; MODELS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-12132-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two essential topics of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are accessible which are clean energy (SDG-7) and climate change action (SDG-13). Developments and innovations in energy technologies play an essential role in achieving these goals. Therefore, any country should use energy R&D expenditures, which are the primary source of energy innovation, most optimally. This paper aims to investigate the environmental efficiency of R&D expenditures for energy efficiency, renewable energy, hydro and fuel cells, fossil energy, nuclear energy, and other power and storage technologies in OECD countries using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and bootstrap DEA. Estimation findings indicate that only the USA ensures the environmental efficiency in energy R&D expenditures among OECD countries. Although Japan, Canada, France, Germany, and Italy cannot provide environmental efficiency in energy R&D, their scores are very close to the efficiency frontier. Portugal, Hungary, and Slovak Republic are the countries with the lowest environmental efficiency in energy R&D expenditures. At the end of the investigation, this paper also provides an empirical estimation of the extent to which inefficient countries should change their R&D spending to achieve efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:19381 / 19390
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] CAPITALIZING R&D EXPENDITURES
    Diewert, W. Erwin
    Huang, Ning
    [J]. MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2011, 15 (04) : 537 - 564
  • [22] Does energy technology R&D save energy in OECD countries?
    Masako Ikegami
    Zijian Wang
    [J]. Economic Change and Restructuring, 2024, 57
  • [23] Does energy technology R&D save energy in OECD countries?
    Ikegami, Masako
    Wang, Zijian
    [J]. ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2024, 57 (02)
  • [24] Environmental variables and relative efficiency of bank branches: a DEA-bootstrap approach
    Barth, Wolfgang
    Staat, Matthias
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 7 (03) : 228 - 240
  • [25] The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries
    Kocak, Emrah
    Ulucak, Zubeyde Senturk
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (14) : 14328 - 14338
  • [26] The effect of energy R&D expenditures on CO2 emission reduction: estimation of the STIRPAT model for OECD countries
    Emrah Koçak
    Zübeyde Şentürk Ulucak
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26 : 14328 - 14338
  • [27] Examination of Patents, R&D Expenditures and R&D Personnel Relationship in USA using ARDL Approach
    Palfyova, Janka
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN CONFERENCE IN FINANCE AND ECONOMICS (CEFE2015), 2015, : 503 - 509
  • [28] Energy saving in China: Analysis on the energy efficiency via bootstrap-DEA approach
    Song, Malin
    Yang, Li
    Wu, Jie
    Lv, Wendong
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 57 : 1 - 6
  • [29] R&D efficiency and barriers to entry: a two stage semi-parametric DEA approach
    Cullmann, Astrid
    Schmidt-Ehmcke, Jens
    Zloczysti, Petra
    [J]. OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 2012, 64 (01): : 176 - 196
  • [30] Evaluating R&D efficiency in logistics based on DEA approach: An illustrative example from China
    Contemporary Business and Trade Research Center, Zhejiang Gongshang University, P.O. Box 310018, Hangzhou, China
    [J]. ICLEM: Logist. Sustained Econ. Dev. - Infrastruct., Inf., Integr. - Proc. Int. Conf. Logist. Eng. Manage, (3813-3819):