Rate of EGFR mutation testing for patients with nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer with implementation of reflex testing by pathologists

被引:26
|
作者
Cheema, P. K. [1 ]
Raphael, S. [2 ]
El-Maraghi, R. [3 ]
Li, J. [4 ]
McClure, R. [5 ]
Zibdawi, L. [6 ]
Chan, A. [7 ]
Victor, J. C. [8 ]
Dolley, A. [9 ]
Dziarmaga, A. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Odette Canc Ctr, Div Med Oncol & Hematol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] North York Gen Hosp, Dept Anat Pathol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Royal Victoria Reg Hlth Ctr, Dept Med Oncol Hematol, Barrie, ON, Canada
[4] Michael Garron Hosp, Dept Med Oncol Hematol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Hlth Sci North, Dept Anat Pathol, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[6] Southlake Reg Hlth Ctr, Dept Med Oncol Hematol, Newmarket, ON, Canada
[7] Thunder Bay Reg Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med Oncol Hematol, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[9] AstraZeneca Canada Inc, Mississauga, ON, Canada
关键词
Reflex testing; EGFR; biomarkers; non-small-cell lung cancer; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITORS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; GUIDELINE; GEFITINIB; TIME; ADENOCARCINOMA; CHEMOTHERAPY; SELECTION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3747/co.24.3266
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Testing for mutation of the EGFR ( epidermal growth factor receptor) gene is a standard of care for patients with advanced nonsquamous non- small- cell lung cancer ( nsclc). To improve timely access to EGFR results, a few centres implemented reflex testing, defined as a request for EGFR testing by the pathologist at the time of a nonsquamous nsclc diagnosis. We evaluated the impact of reflex testing on EGFR testing rates. Methods A retrospective observational review of the Web- based AstraZeneca Canada EGFR Database from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2014 found centres within Ontario that had requested EGFR testing through the database and that had implemented reflex testing ( with at least 2 years' worth of data, including the pre- and post- implementation period). Results The 7 included centres had requested EGFR tests for 2214 patients. The proportion of pathologists requesting EGFR tests increased after implementation of reflex testing ( 53% vs. 4%); conversely, the proportion of medical oncologists requesting tests decreased ( 46% vs. 95%, p < 0.001). After implementation of reflex testing, the mean number of patients having EGFR testing per centre per month increased significantly [ 12.6 vs. 4.9 ( range: 4.5- 14.9), p < 0.001]. Before reflex testing, EGFR testing rates showed a significant monthly increase over time ( 1.37 more tests per month; 95% confidence interval: 1.19 to 1.55 tests; p < 0.001). That trend could not account for the observed increase with reflex testing, because an immediate increase in EGFR test requests was observed with the introduction of reflex testing ( p = 0.003), and the overall trend was sustained throughout the post- reflex testing period ( p < 0.001). Conclusions Reflex EGFR testing for patients with nonsquamous nsclc was successfully implemented at multiple centres and was associated with an increase in EGFR testing.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 22
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation - case report
    Jasiowka, Marek
    Cedrych, Ida
    ONCOLOGY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2014, 10 : G46 - G48
  • [42] CYTOLOGY SAMPLES (S) FOR EGFR, KRAS AND ALK TESTING IN NON-SMALL-CELL LUNG CANCER (NSCLC)
    Carcereny, Enric
    Moran, Teresa
    Estival, Anna
    Andreo, Felipe
    Lletjos, Mariona
    Mijangos, Erika
    Sanz, Jose
    Castella, Eva
    Capdevila, Laia
    De Los Llanos Gil, Maria
    Rodriguez, Laura
    Hardy-Werbin, Max
    De Aguirre, Itziar
    Rosell, Rafael
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8 : S356 - S356
  • [43] Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients
    Eaton, Helen
    Dutton, L.
    Wallace, A. J.
    Howard, E.
    Gaunt, L.
    Blackhall, F.
    Newman, W.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2011, 48 : S72 - S72
  • [44] Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutation Testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients
    Wallace, Andrew
    Howard, E.
    Dutton, L.
    Elles, R. G.
    Newman, W.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2010, 47 : S66 - S66
  • [45] Update on EGFR Mutational Testing and the Potential of Noninvasive Liquid Biopsy in Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer
    Kim, Edward
    Feldman, Rebecca
    Wistuba, Ignacio I.
    CLINICAL LUNG CANCER, 2018, 19 (02) : 105 - 114
  • [46] Response to treatment and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing somatic EGFR mutation testing
    Sequist, Lecia V.
    Joshi, Victoria A.
    Janne, Pasi A.
    Muzikansky, Alona
    Fidias, Panos
    Meyerson, Matthew
    Haber, Daniel A.
    Kucherlapati, Raju
    Johnson, Bruce E.
    Lynch, Thomas J.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2007, 12 (01): : 90 - 98
  • [47] Urinary ct-DNA Testing of EGFR Common Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
    Ridwanuloh, A.
    Hariyatun, H.
    Patria, F.
    Hudoyo, A.
    Zaini, J.
    Andarini, S.
    Masykura, N.
    Utomo, A.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 12 (11) : S2222 - S2222
  • [48] EGFR mutation and non-small-cell lung cancer: EGFR test, cost and quality of life
    Thongprasert, Sumitra
    LUNG CANCER MANAGEMENT, 2012, 1 (03) : 169 - 172
  • [49] EGFR Mutation Detection in Brazilian Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Lessons From Real-World Data Scenario of Molecular Testing
    Montella, Tatiane
    Zalis, Mariano
    Zukin, Mauro
    Cordeiro de Lima, Vladmir Claudio
    Baldotto, Clarissa
    De Marchi, Pedro
    Salles, Paulo
    Mathias, Clarissa
    Barrios, Carlos
    Kawamura, Carolina
    Calabrich, Aknar
    Araujo, Luiz Henrique
    Castro, Gilberto
    Bustamante, Carolina
    Maria, Andre Santa
    Reis, Marcelo
    Ferreira, Carlos Gil
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 9 : e2200426
  • [50] Impact of reflex testing for EGFR mutations in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
    Cheema, Parneet Kaur
    Victor, Charles
    Dolley, Aastha
    Dziarmaga, Alison
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)