Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems

被引:13
|
作者
Lebel, Louis
Anderies, John M.
Campbell, Bruce
Folke, Carl
Hatfield-Dodds, Steve
Hughes, Terry P.
Wilson, James
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] No Terr Univ, Darwin, NT 0909, Australia
[3] Stockholm Univ, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[5] Univ Maine, Orono, ME 04469 USA
来源
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY | 2006年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
governance; resilience; adaptive capacity; institutions; accountability; deliberation; participation; social justice; polycentric institutions; multilayered institutions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The sustainability of regional development can be usefully explored through several different lenses. In situations in which uncertainties and change are key features of the ecological landscape and social organization, critical factors for sustainability are resilience, the capacity to cope and adapt, and the conservation of sources of innovation and renewal. However, interventions in social-ecological systems with the aim of altering resilience immediately confront issues of governance. Who decides what should be made resilient to what? For whom is resilience to be managed, and for what purpose? In this paper we draw on the insights from a diverse set of case studies from around the world in which members of the Resilience Alliance have observed or engaged with sustainability problems at regional scales. Our central question is: How do certain attributes of governance function in society to enhance the capacity to manage resilience? Three specific propositions were explored: ( 1) participation builds trust, and deliberation leads to the shared understanding needed to mobilize and self-organize; ( 2) polycentric and multilayered institutions improve the fit between knowledge, action, and social-ecological contexts in ways that allow societies to respond more adaptively at appropriate levels; and ( 3) accountable authorities that also pursue just distributions of benefits and involuntary risks enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups and society as a whole. Some support was found for parts of all three propositions. In exploring the sustainability of regional social-ecological systems, we are usually faced with a set of ecosystem goods and services that interact with a collection of users with different technologies, interests, and levels of power. In this situation in our roles as analysts, facilitators, change agents, or stakeholders, we not only need to ask: The resilience of what, to what? We must also ask: For whom?
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Social-Ecological Resilience Assessment and Governance Guide for Urbanization Processes in East China
    Zhang, Chen
    Li, Yangfan
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (11)
  • [42] Digital governance in rural Chengdu, China: Its potential for social-ecological resilience
    Wu, Shuang
    Abramson, Daniel Benjamin
    Zhong, Bo
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2022, 4
  • [43] Towards a bridging concept for undesirable resilience in social-ecological systems
    Dornelles, Andre Z.
    Boyd, Emily
    Nunes, Richard J.
    Asquith, Mike
    Boonstra, Wiebren J.
    Delabre, Izabela
    Denney, J. Michael
    Grimm, Volker
    Jentsch, Anke
    Nicholas, Kimberly A.
    Schroter, Matthias
    Seppelt, Ralf
    Settele, Josef
    Shackelford, Nancy
    Standish, Rachel J.
    Yengoh, Genesis Tambang
    Oliver, Tom H.
    GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 3
  • [44] Integrating social-ecological dynamics and resilience into energy systems research
    Hodbod, Jennifer
    Adger, W. Neil
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 1 : 226 - 231
  • [45] Focus Issue: Restoring Mountain Systems for Social-Ecological Resilience
    Urbach, Davnah
    Azevedo, Joao Carlos
    Belsky, Jill M.
    Clark, V. Ralph
    Postigo, Julio
    Wu, Yanhong
    MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 43 (04) : 1 - 3
  • [46] Resilience, Rationalism, and Response in Modern Chinese Social-Ecological Systems
    Denise M. Glover
    Jack P. Hayes
    Stevan Harrell
    Human Ecology, 2021, 49 : 3 - 5
  • [47] Continuity and Change in Social-ecological Systems: the Role of Institutional Resilience
    Herrfahrdt-Paehle, Elke
    Pahl-Wostl, Claudia
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (02):
  • [48] Actors' diversity and the resilience of social-ecological systems to global change
    Gret-Regamey, Adrienne
    Huber, Sibyl H.
    Huber, Robert
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 2 (04) : 290 - 297
  • [49] Social-Ecological Systems Governance: From Paradigm to Management Approach
    Frantzeskaki, Niki
    Slinger, Jill
    Vreugdenhil, Heleen
    van Daalen, Els
    NATURE + CULTURE, 2010, 5 (01): : 84 - 98
  • [50] Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: A synthesis framework
    Koontz, Tomas M.
    Gupta, Diuya
    Mudliar, Pranietha
    Ranjan, Pranay
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2015, 53 : 139 - 151