A novel geothermal combined cooling and power cycle based on the absorption power cycle: Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis

被引:131
|
作者
Parikhani, Towhid [1 ]
Ghaebi, Hadi [1 ]
Rostamzadeh, Hadi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mohaghegh Ardabili, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, POB 179, Ardebil, Iran
关键词
Combined cooling and power (CCP) system; Absorption power cycle (APC); Energy and exergy analysis; Exergoeconomic analysis; Geothermal; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; WATER COMBINED POWER; THERMOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; KALINA CYCLE; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; REFRIGERATION CYCLE; SYSTEM DRIVEN; HEAT; COGENERATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.153
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analysis of a novel combined cooling and power (CCP) system for producing cooling and power outputs are presented based on the absorption power cycle (APC), using geothermal energy as low-temperature heat source. A comprehensive thermodynamic modeling of the proposed CCP system is carried out leading to determine the main source of irreversibility and performance characteristics of the system for a better thermal design purpose. In the parametric study, the effect of key thermodynamic parameters (i.e., generator hot pinch point temperature difference (PPTD), generator cold PPTD, ammonia concentration, absorber minimum temperature difference, condenser minimum temperature difference, evaporator temperature, and geothermal temperature) on the key performance parameters (i.e., net output power, cooling capacity, thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency, and sum unit cost of product (SUCP) of system) are investigated. It is found that the proposed system can produce cooling capacity and net output power of 221.4 kW and 161.2 kW, respectively, under supplying 2333 kW heat from the geothermal source. In this case, the overall thermal efficiency, exergy efficiency, and SUCP of system are calculated by 16.4%, 28.95% and 93.87 $/GJ, respectively. From exergy analysis it is understood that among all components, absorber accounted for the largest contribution of exergy destruction which constituted around 39.89% of the overall exergy destruction of system. In addition, the highest cost of exergy destruction corresponded to the absorber which is followed by the condenser. Finally, parametric study revealed that the exergy efficiency of the proposed system can be maximized based upon the ammonia concentration and evaporator temperature. Moreover, it is shown that the thermal efficiency of system can be increased by increasing of the generator hot PPTD and evaporator temperature or decreasing ammonia concentration, absorber and condenser minimum temperature differences, and geothermal temperature. While, it is also found that the SUCP of system can be decreased by increasing the generator cold PPTD, condenser minimum temperature difference, and geothermal temperature or decreasing the generator hot PPTD, absorber minimum temperature difference, and evaporator temperature. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 277
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental Assessment of Flash-Binary Geothermal Combined Cooling, Heating and Power Cycle
    Shamoushaki, Moein
    Aliehyaei, Mehdi
    Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (15)
  • [2] A novel cooling and power cycle based on the absorption power cycle and booster-assisted ejector refrigeration cycle driven by a low-grade heat source: Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis
    Wang, Yazi
    Chen, Tian
    Liang, Yingbo
    Sun, Huaibo
    Zhu, Yiping
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 204
  • [3] Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis on a novel parallel double-effect absorption power cycle driven by the geothermal resource
    Zhang, Feng
    Yan, Yongqi
    Liao, Gaoliang
    Jiaqiang, E.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2022, 258
  • [4] Exergy Analysis of a Combined Power and Cooling Cycle
    Karaali, R.
    [J]. ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA A, 2016, 130 (01) : 209 - 213
  • [5] Exergy analysis of a combined power and cooling cycle
    Fontalvo, Armando
    Pinzon, Horacio
    Duarte, Jorge
    Bula, Antonio
    Gonzalez Quiroga, Arturo
    Vasquez Padilla, Ricardo
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 60 (1-2) : 164 - 171
  • [6] Energy and exergy analysis of an absorption power cycle
    Garcia-Hernando, Nestor
    de Vega, M.
    Soria-Verdugo, Antonio
    Sanchez-Delgado, Sergio
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 55 (1-2) : 69 - 77
  • [7] Thermodynamic analysis of a novel absorption power/cooling combined cycle
    Zheng, DX
    Bing, C
    Yun, Q
    Jin, HG
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SORPTION HEAT PUMP CONFERENCE, 2002, : 204 - 209
  • [8] Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a combined cooling, desalination and power system
    Zhou, Shihe
    Liu, Xinyu
    Bian, Yongning
    Shen, Shengqiang
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 218
  • [9] Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Novel Combined Power/Cooling Production Cycle Based on Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
    Khani, L.
    Mahmoudi, S. M. S.
    Chitsaz, A.
    [J]. EXERGY FOR A BETTER ENVIRONMENT AND IMPROVED SUSTAINABILITY 1: FUNDAMENTALS, 2018, : 1293 - 1309
  • [10] Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Impact Analyses and Optimization of Various Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations
    Shamoushaki, Moein
    Aliehyaei, Mehdi
    Rosen, Marc A.
    [J]. ENTROPY, 2021, 23 (11)