Using Context-aware Workflows for Failure Management in a Smart Factory

被引:0
|
作者
Wieland, Matthias [1 ]
Leymann, Frank [1 ]
Schaefer, Michael [1 ]
Lucke, Dominik [2 ]
Constantinescu, Carmen [2 ]
Westkaemper, Engelbert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Architecture Applicat Syst, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Stuttgart, IFF, Inst Ind Engn & Management, Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
context-awareness; context models; workflow systems; human tasks; production environments; humane system design; mobile applications; ubiquitous computing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In factories many processes are executed in parallel. The manufacturing processes are managed by Manufacturing Execution Systems. In the case of machine failures these systems provide only rudimentary or no support to the workers or shop-floor managers. As a consequence the failures have to be fixed as fast as possible for being able to continue manufacturing processes. For such cases context-aware workflows can be used to support the workers and to coordinate the work that has to be done for repairing purposes. In the Nexus Project we introduced the concept of context-aware workflows and context integration processes to be able to implement all kinds of processes going on in a smart environment. As a case study we modeled a failure management process as a workflow and executed it in a factory. Furthermore, we show the concepts behind this kind of workflows: the context integration processes and the context-aware human tasks. Finally, end user applications for the interaction of the workers with the workflow are presented. For that we developed an application concept providing a mobile solution for workers and a web-based solution for an office environment. The main contribution of this paper is to show how to implement such a failure management process as a context-aware workflow.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:379 / 384
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Run-Time Variability for Context-Aware Smart Workflows
    Murguzur, Aitor
    Trujillo, Salvador
    Hong-Linh Truong
    Dustdar, Schahram
    Ortiz, Oscar
    Sagardui, Goiuria
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2015, 32 (03) : 52 - 60
  • [2] Agent Participation in Context-Aware Workflows
    Fernandez-de-Alba, Jose M.
    Fuentes-Fernandez, Ruben
    Pavon, Juan
    HYBRID ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2013, 8073 : 31 - 40
  • [3] An IoT Approach for Context-aware Smart Traffic Management Using Ontology
    Goel, Deepti
    Chaudhury, Santanu
    Ghosh, Hiranmay
    2017 IEEE/WIC/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INTELLIGENCE (WI 2017), 2017, : 42 - 49
  • [4] Context-Aware Energy Efficiency Management for Smart Buildings
    Kamienski, Carlos
    Borelli, Fabrizio
    Biondi, Gabriela
    Rosa, Willian
    Pinheiro, Isaac
    Zyrianoff, Ivan
    Sadok, Djamel
    Pramudianto, Ferry
    2015 IEEE 2ND WORLD FORUM ON INTERNET OF THINGS (WF-IOT), 2015, : 699 - 704
  • [5] Context-Aware Resource Management in Heterogenous Smart Environments
    Roy, Abhishek
    Saxena, Navrati
    Shin, Jitae
    IEICE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2009, E92B (01) : 318 - 321
  • [6] The specification and design of secure context-aware workflows
    Zedan, Hussein
    Al-Sultan, Saif
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2017, 86 : 367 - 384
  • [7] A methodology for designing and managing context-aware workflows
    Modafferi, S
    Benatallah, B
    Casati, F
    Pernici, B
    MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS II, 2005, 191 : 91 - 106
  • [8] Using Smart Phones for Context-Aware Prompting in Smart Environments
    Das, Barnan
    Seelye, Adriana M.
    Thomas, Brian L.
    Cook, Diane J.
    Holder, Larry B.
    Schmitter-Edgecombe, Maureen
    2012 IEEE CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING CONFERENCE (CCNC), 2012, : 399 - 403
  • [9] A Soft Context-Aware Traffic Management System for Smart Cities
    Carneiro, Davide
    Amaral, Antonio
    Carvalho, Mariana
    INTELLIGENT ENVIRONMENTS 2020, 2020, 28 : 187 - 196
  • [10] Context-aware Workflow Model for Supporting Composite Workflows
    Jong-sun CHOI
    Jae-young CHOI
    Yong-yun CHO
    Journal of Measurement Science and Instrumentation, 2010, (02) : 161 - 165