Word Segmentation Cues in German Child-Directed Speech: A Corpus Analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Stark, Katja [1 ]
Kidd, Evan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Frost, Rebecca L. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Language Dev Dept, Wundtlaan 1, NL-6525 XD Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Psychol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] ARC Ctr Excellence Dynam Language, Canberra, ACT, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Language acquisition; speech segmentation; distributional cues; child-directed speech; German; INFANTS DISCRIMINATION; LANGUAGE; FREQUENCY; STRESS; PERCEPTION; CONSTRAINTS; STATISTICS; MORPHEMES; PATTERNS; FRENCH;
D O I
10.1177/0023830920979016
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
To acquire language, infants must learn to segment words from running speech. A significant body of experimental research shows that infants use multiple cues to do so; however, little research has comprehensively examined the distribution of such cues in naturalistic speech. We conducted a comprehensive corpus analysis of German child-directed speech (CDS) using data from the Child Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES) database, investigating the availability of word stress, transitional probabilities (TPs), and lexical and sublexical frequencies as potential cues for word segmentation. Seven hours of data (similar to 15,000 words) were coded, representing around an average day of speech to infants. The analysis revealed that for 97% of words, primary stress was carried by the initial syllable, implicating stress as a reliable cue to word onset in German CDS. Word identity was also marked by TPs between syllables, which were higher within than between words, and higher for backwards than forwards transitions. Words followed a Zipfian-like frequency distribution, and over two-thirds of words (78%) were monosyllabic. Of the 50 most frequent words, 82% were function words, which accounted for 47% of word tokens in the entire corpus. Finally, 15% of all utterances comprised single words. These results give rich novel insights into the availability of segmentation cues in German CDS, and support the possibility that infants draw on multiple converging cues to segment their input. The data, which we make openly available to the research community, will help guide future experimental investigations on this topic.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 27
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The use of complex structures with a word class change in Inuktitut child-directed speech
    Johnson, Olga Alice
    Allen, Shanley E. M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [22] Lexically Restricted Utterances in Russian, German, and English Child-Directed Speech
    Stoll, Sabine
    Abbot-Smith, Kirsten
    Lieven, Elena
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2009, 33 (01) : 75 - 103
  • [23] Child-directed Speech and Foreigner Talk
    马小梅
    [J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2004, (S2) : 433 - 437
  • [24] Additive Effects of Lengthening on the Utterance-Final Word in Child-Directed Speech
    Ko, Eon-Suk
    Soderstrom, Melanie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 56 (01): : 364 - 371
  • [25] Phonological variation in child-directed speech
    Foulkes, P
    Docherty, G
    Watt, D
    [J]. LANGUAGE, 2005, 81 (01) : 177 - 206
  • [26] Prosodic disambiguation in child-directed speech
    Kempe, Vera
    Schaeffler, Sonja
    Thoresen, John C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2010, 62 (02) : 204 - 225
  • [27] Adjacent and Non-Adjacent Word Contexts Both Predict Age of Acquisition of English Words: A Distributional Corpus Analysis of Child-Directed Speech
    Chang, Lucas M.
    Deak, Gedeon O.
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2020, 44 (11)
  • [28] ChiSense-12: An English Sense-Annotated Child-Directed Speech Corpus
    Cabiddu, Francesco
    Bott, Lewis
    Jones, Gary
    Gambi, Chiara
    [J]. LREC 2022: THIRTEEN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2022, : 5198 - 5205
  • [30] Prosodic patterns in Hebrew child-directed speech
    Segal, Osnat
    Nir-Sagiv, Bracha
    Kishon-Rabin, Liat
    Ravid, Dorit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2009, 36 (03) : 629 - 656