Determination of EGFR Status in Gliomas Usefulness of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization

被引:18
|
作者
Guillaudeau, Angelique [1 ]
Durand, Karine [1 ]
Pommepuy, Isabelle [1 ]
Robert, Sandrine [1 ]
Chaunavel, Alain [1 ]
Lacorre, Sylvain [1 ]
DeArmas, Rafael [1 ]
Bourtoumieux, Sylvie [2 ]
El Demery, Mounira [3 ]
Moreau, Jean-Jacques [4 ]
Labrousse, Francois [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Dupuytren, Dept Pathol, F-87042 Limoges, France
[2] CHU Dupuytren, Dept Cytol, F-87042 Limoges, France
[3] CHU Dupuytren, Dept Med Oncol, F-87042 Limoges, France
[4] CHU Dupuytren, Dept Neurosurg, F-87042 Limoges, France
关键词
gliomas; fluorescent in situ hybridization; immunohistochemistry; EGFR; EPIDERMAL-GROWTH-FACTOR; FACTOR-RECEPTOR GENE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; GLIOBLASTOMA-MULTIFORME; MALIGNANT GLIOMAS; COPY NUMBER; AMPLIFICATION; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1097/PAI.0b013e31818db320
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is produced during the molecular pathogenesis of glioma, and new anti-EGFR molecules are available for therapeutics. Consequently, analyses of the EGFR gene and protein are frequently used for characterization. We compare the accuracy and the usefulness of 2 currently used techniques for histologic classification of gliomas. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques were used to assess EGFR gene amplification and protein abundance in a series of 35 gliomas, including World Health Organization (WHO) grade I, II, and III astrocytomas (AI, AII, AIII), grade II and III tumors with oligodendroglial component (OII, OIII) and grade IV glioblastomas (GBs). EGFR gene amplification was found in one-third of the tumors studied. It was frequent in GB and OIII but was never found in AI, AII, AIII, and OII tumors. IHC and FISH provided similar findings for grade of tumor, despite the fact that, in contrast to the FISH gene amplification. EGFR protein was overexpressed in AIII and in GB. EGFR gene amplification was never observed in tumors not containing EGFR protein: therefore FISH is unnecessary when IHC shows no EGFR protein expression. EGFR gene amplification seems to he restricted to high-grade tumors. WHO grade IV astrocytomas, and grade III oligodendroglial tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 226
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: Evaluation of the Status of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors (EGFR and HER-2) by Immunohistochemistry and in Situ Hybridization
    Delektorskaya, V. V.
    Chemeris, G. Yu.
    Zavalishina, L. E.
    Ryazantseva, A. A.
    Grigorchuk, A. Yu.
    Kononets, P. V.
    Davydov, M. I.
    BULLETIN OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2010, 149 (05) : 615 - 620
  • [32] Sex determination from fingermarks using fluorescent in situ hybridization
    van Dam, Annemieke
    van Weert, Angela
    Falkena, Kim
    Weymans, Chantal
    Kloosterman, Ate D.
    Lambrechts, Saskia A. G.
    van Leeuwen, Ton G.
    Aalders, Maurice C. G.
    ANALYTICAL METHODS, 2018, 10 (12) : 1413 - 1419
  • [33] Her2 Status in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison of Immunohistochemistry (IHC), Fluorescent In-Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Dual Color Silver In-Situ Hybridization (SISH) Methods.
    Zhou, C.
    Huntsman, D.
    Carter, B.
    Thomson, T.
    Lorette, J.
    Lee, S.
    Bell, L.
    Aubin, F.
    Woods, R.
    Lim, H.
    Gill, S.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 24 : 174A - 174A
  • [34] Determination of EGFR, Her2/neu, PTEN, and p53 protein expression and gene status by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in high-grade glioma
    Sadones, J.
    Michotte, A.
    Veld, P. In 't
    Menten, Chaskis J.
    Strauven, T.
    D'Hondt, L.
    Joosens, E.
    De Grèeve, J.
    Neyns, B.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2006, 8 (04) : 325 - 325
  • [35] c-Met Immunohistochemistry in EGFR Mutant Adenocarcinoma: Comparison with Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization
    Willis, B. C.
    Mortin, D. R.
    Saxe, D.
    Ramalingam, S. S.
    Khuri, F.
    Fisher, K. E.
    Rossi, M. R.
    Cohen, C.
    Sica, G.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2014, 94 : 499A - 499A
  • [36] c-Met Immunohistochemistry in EGFR Mutant Adenocarcinoma: Comparison with Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization
    Willis, B. C.
    Martin, D. R.
    Saxe, D.
    Ramalingam, S. S.
    Khuri, F.
    Fisher, K. E.
    Rossi, M. R.
    Cohen, C.
    Sica, G.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 27 : 499A - 499A
  • [37] EGFR and ERCC1 expression by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in resected colorectal adenocarcinoma
    Kim, J.
    Bae, B.
    Shin, E.
    Kim, H.
    Park, K.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2009, 455 : 134 - 134
  • [38] HER2 status in invasive breast cancer: Immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in-situ hybridization and chromogenic in-situ hybridization
    Shirsat, Hemlata S.
    Epari, Sridhar
    Shet, Tanuja
    Bagal, Rajani
    Hawaldar, Rohini
    Desai, Sangeeta B.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND MICROBIOLOGY, 2012, 55 (02) : 175 - 179
  • [39] Confrontation of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization for the assessment of HER-2/neu (c-erbb-2) status in urothelial carcinoma
    Gonzague de Pinieux
    Delphine Colin
    Anne Vincent-Salomon
    Jérôme Couturier
    Delphine Amsellem-Ouazana
    Philippe Beuzeboc
    Annick Vieillefond
    Virchows Archiv, 2004, 444 : 415 - 419
  • [40] Confrontation of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization for the assessment of HER-2/neu (c-erbb-2) status in urothelial carcinoma
    de Pinieux, G
    Colin, D
    Vincent-Salomon, A
    Couturier, J
    Amsellem-Ouazana, D
    Beuzeboc, P
    Vieillefond, A
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2004, 444 (05) : 415 - 419