QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS OF HYDROGEN EVENTS AT WTP: PART 1 OF 2-THE OPERATIONAL FREQUENCY ANALYSIS MODEL

被引:0
|
作者
Lux, C. Ray [1 ]
O'Kula, Kevin R. [1 ]
Wentink, Michael A.
Jones, Ryan E.
Collin, Jean E.
Gross, David J.
机构
[1] URS Safety Management Solut LLC, Aiken, SC 29803 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A Quantitative Risk Analysis (QRA) model has been developed to determine the frequency and severity (potential combustion loads) of postulated hydrogen event types in piping systems and proposed as a design-informing tool for the US. Department of Energy's (DOE) Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) at the Hanford Site near Richland, Washington. Specifically, the QRA provides a systematic, comprehensive methodology for assessing hydrogen events, including deflagrations, detonations, and deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) types in piping systems containing legacy nuclear waste streams being processed for vitrification. The events considered include normal operations as well as postulated upset conditions as a result of internal and external accidents. The QRA approach incorporates three sequential phases, including Operational Frequency Analysis (OFA), Gas Pocket Formation (GPF) and Event Progression Logic (EPL) models in the form of an integrated logic framework The WTP piping design will be evaluated on a specific piping route basis using a probabilistic sampling approach, with the QRA providing the quantitative dynamic loads for evaluation according to the frequency and type of hydrogen event. The OFA is based on an industry standard fault tree computer model, CAFTA, and analyzes the frequency of combustible gas pocket formation in a piping system from three primary sources: (1) normal operations; (2) piping system-specific upset conditions affecting transfer operations; and (3) plant-wide initiating events such as fire and seismic accidents. A second output from the OFA is duration time for each event, quantifying the length of time that a gas pocket is likely to develop before the initiating event is terminated, with the information provided directly to QRA event tree models for assessing gas pocket growth. A team of safety, operations and engineering, developed the underlying logic of the fault tree model with the overall modeling approach following applicable nuclear/chemical industry guidance and standards for performing QRA applications. Primary inputs to the OFA module are initiating event, equipment reliability, and human/operator error data and their characteristic distributions, and are drawn from Hanford Site safety documentation, government and commercial sector sources, and related nuclear/chemical industry experience. This paper discusses the overall OFA module, its inputs, the outputs to the GPF and EPL modules, the relative importance of different initiating event conditions, key insights obtained to date, upcoming supporting uncertainty/sensitivity analyses, and summarizes technical peer review assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 136
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Quantitative Risk Analysis Model and Simulation Of Enterprise Networks
    Lamichhane, Prabin B.
    Hong, Liang
    Shetty, Sachin
    2018 IEEE 9TH ANNUAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONICS AND MOBILE COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (IEMCON), 2018, : 844 - 850
  • [22] The Dutch model for the quantitative risk analysis of road tunnels
    Brussaard, LA
    Kruiskamp, MM
    Essink, MPO
    PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOL 1- 6, 2004, : 2660 - 2665
  • [23] A quantitative risk analysis model considering uncertain information
    He, Rui
    Li, Xinhong
    Chen, Guoming
    Wang, Yanchun
    Jiang, Shengyu
    Zhi, Chenxiao
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2018, 118 : 361 - 370
  • [24] The impact of model risk on capital reserves: a quantitative analysis
    Bertram, Philip
    Sibbertsen, Philipp
    Stahl, Gerhard
    JOURNAL OF RISK, 2015, 17 (06): : 69 - 97
  • [25] Mean occurrence frequency and temporal risk analysis of solar particle events
    Kim, Myung-Hee Y.
    Cucinotta, Francis A.
    Wilson, John W.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2006, 41 (9-10) : 1115 - 1122
  • [26] Risk Analysis for Quality Control Part 1: The Impact of Transition Assumptions in the Parvin Model
    Schmidt, Robert L.
    Moore, Ryleigh A.
    Walker, Brandon S.
    Rudolf, Joseph W.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 8 (01): : 14 - 22
  • [27] AN ECONOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF COMMERCIAL BANKS' OPERATIONAL RISK BASED ON THE INCOME MODEL
    Yue Ni
    Ye Shu-jun
    DCABES 2009: THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS TO BUSINESS, ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 451 - 455
  • [28] Disaster Risk Analysis Part 2: The Systemic Underestimation of Risk
    Mamuji, Aaida A.
    Etkin, David
    JOURNAL OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 16 (01)
  • [29] Quantitative analysis of the risk of hydrogen sulfide release from gas hydrates
    Wang, Xianqing
    Liu, Siqing
    Zhao, Bin
    Yao, Yanfu
    Wu, Gang
    Xie, Rui
    Fu, Yutong
    Ning, Zijie
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [30] Software for risk analysis in business projects Part 1
    Engineering Management Journal, 1996, 6 (06): : 283 - 289