Tumor lysis syndrome in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: conventional treatment versus novel agents A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Kassem, Nancy [1 ]
Ghazy, Ahmed A. [2 ]
Abu-Tineh, Mohammad [3 ]
Omar, Nabil E. [1 ]
Nashwan, Abdulqadir J. [4 ]
Chandra, Prem [5 ]
Ghasoub, Rola [1 ]
AbuTabar, Osama S. [6 ,7 ]
Yassin, Mohamed A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Med Corp, Natl Ctr Canc Care & Res, Pharm Dept, POB 3050, Doha, Qatar
[2] Hamad Med Corp, Natl Ctr Canc Care & Res, Bariatr Med Dept, Doha, Qatar
[3] Hamad Med Corp, Natl Ctr Canc Care & Res, Med Oncol Hematol Dept, Doha, Qatar
[4] Hamad Med Corp, Hazm Mebaireek Gen Hosp, Nursing Dept, Doha, Qatar
[5] Hamad Med Corp, Med Res Ctr, Doha, Qatar
[6] Cleveland Clin Abu Dhabi, Pharm Dept, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[7] Univ Oxford, Kellogg Coll, Oxford, England
关键词
chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; conventional chemotherapeutic agents; novel chemotherapeutic agents; tumor lysis syndrome; IBRUTINIB; RISK; TRIAL; STAGE;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000023632
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Existing evidence on the difference in the incidence of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) patients receiving novel therapies versus patients receiving conventional therapies is limited and inconclusive. The aims of this planned systematic review and meta-analysis are therefore (1) assess the TLS incidence reported in clinical trials for the novel or targeted agents comparing to conventional chemotherapeutic agents used to treat patients with CLL (2) to identify the TLS prophylaxis strategies that are utilized in clinical trials of the novel or targeted agents for CLL if it was fully reported or under-reported and (3) to compare the mortality among patients with TLS in conventional versus novel agents. Methods: We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis. Several electronic databases will be searched using predefined search terms to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies should report findings on the incidence of TLS in CLL patients. Primary observational studies with cross-sectional or prospective research design, case-control studies, and studies with experimental designs will be included. Study quality will be evaluated by 2 reviewers using the statistical methodology and categories described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and other applicable guidelines. The meta-analysis will be performed and conducted using applicable standard statistical software like comprehensive meta-analysis and STATA. Discussion: This review and meta-analysis will be among the first to systematically explore and integrate the evidence available on the comparison between the incidences of TLS in CLL patients treated with novel agents versus conventional agents. By gathering and summarizing information about the risk of TLS in this patient population, the findings from this review will provide insights for future research directions and more understanding of the difference of TLS incidence between novel treatments and conventional treatment and suggest prophylactic measures for such cases. Systematic review registration: The protocol has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO; registration number: CRD42020166770). The protocol was registered with the Hamad medical corporation, Medical research Center registry under a unique reference number (MRC-01-20-709).
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measurable Residual Disease and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rios-Olais, Fausto Alfredo
    McGary, Alyssa K.
    Tsang, Mazie
    Almader-Douglas, Diana
    Leis, Jose F.
    Buras, Matthew R.
    Hilal, Talal
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10 (09) : 1221 - 1227
  • [32] RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prognostic models for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stefano Molica
    Diana Giannarelli
    Leukemia, 2021, 35 : 615 - 618
  • [33] Candidate gene association studies and risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sava, Georgina P.
    Speedy, Helen E.
    Houlston, Richard S.
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2014, 55 (01) : 160 - 167
  • [34] Randomized Controlled Trials in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Police, Rachel L.
    Trask, Peter C.
    Wang, Jianmin
    Olivares, Robert
    Khan, Shahnaz
    Abbe, Adeline
    Colosia, Ann
    Njue, Annete
    Sherri, Beth
    Ruiz-Soto, Rodrigo
    Kaye, James A.
    Hamadani, Mehdi
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2015, 15 (04): : 199 - 207
  • [35] Efficacy of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang Liang
    Ming Zhao
    Yuan-chao Zhu
    Xin Hu
    Li-ping Yang
    Hui Liu
    Annals of Hematology, 2016, 95 : 1473 - 1482
  • [36] Retraction Note: Prognostic models for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Stefano Molica
    Diana Giannarelli
    Leukemia, 2023, 37 : 254 - 254
  • [37] Efficacy of lenalidomide in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Liang
    Zhao, Ming
    Zhu, Yuan-chao
    Hu, Xin
    Yang, Li-ping
    Liu, Hui
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2016, 95 (09) : 1473 - 1482
  • [38] Expanding the armamentarium for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A review of novel agents in the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia
    Marini, Bernard L.
    Samanas, Lisa
    Perissinotti, Anthony J.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2017, 23 (07) : 502 - 517
  • [39] LigaSure versus Conventional Parotidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Sonia Wei-Ting
    Hsin, Li-Jen
    Lin, Wan-Ni
    Tsai, Yao-Te
    Tsai, Ming-Shao
    Lee, Yi-Chan
    HEALTHCARE, 2022, 10 (04)
  • [40] Immunomodulatory treatment for lymphocytic myocarditis—a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Max-Paul Winter
    Patrick Sulzgruber
    Lorenz Koller
    Philipp Bartko
    Georg Goliasch
    Alexander Niessner
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2018, 23 : 573 - 581