Travel time savings, accessibility gains and equity effects in cost-benefit analysis

被引:65
|
作者
Martens, Karel [1 ,2 ]
Di Ciommo, Floridea [3 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Architecture & Town Planning, Haifa, Israel
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Politecn Catalunya Barcelona Tech, CENIT Ctr Innovat Transport, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Appraisal; cost-benefit analysis; travel time savings; accessibility gains; equity; DISTRIBUTIONAL WEIGHTS; LAND-USE; USER BENEFIT; TRANSPORT; SUSTAINABILITY; NETHERLANDS; DISCOURSES; APPRAISAL; IMPACTS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2016.1276642
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
The growing interest in the equity dimensions of transport planning has resulted in increasing criticism on the dominant assessment methodology of transport projects: cost-benefit analysis (CBA). In this paper, we focus on travel time savings, given their importance in the assessment of transport projects and the sometimes fierce equity-related citicism on their inclusion in project appraisal. We identify five equity effects related to the use of travel time savings in CBA. Each of these equity effects implies that transport projects serving the majority population are highly likely to perform better in CBA than comparable projects serving disadvantaged population groups. We subsequently explore whether the replacement of travel time savings by accessibility gains can address the identified equity effects. We observe that this only holds for two of the five equity effects, while a third effect can be mitigated through the introduction of the notion of diminishing marginal return in the valuation of accessibility gains. We conclude that the mere introduction of accessibility gains is in itself insufficient to address all equity effects related to the application of travel time savings within the CBA framework.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 169
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COST-BENEFIT SIMULATION-MODEL FOR AIRCRAFT TRAVEL
    CLAYTON, ER
    MOORE, LJ
    LARSON, R
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1975, 23 : B290 - B290
  • [22] Models of winner and loser effects: a cost-benefit analysis
    Hock, Karlo
    Huber, Robert
    BEHAVIOUR, 2009, 146 : 69 - 87
  • [23] Valuation of road safety effects in cost-benefit analysis
    Wijnen, Wim
    Wesemann, Paul
    de Blaeij, Arianne
    EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2009, 32 (04) : 326 - 331
  • [24] The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It
    Flyvbjerg, Bent
    Bester, Dirk W.
    JOURNAL OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS, 2021, 12 (03) : 395 - 419
  • [25] Beware the cost-benefit analysis
    Spence, Des
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [26] Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning
    Alaoui, Larbi
    Penta, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, : 881 - 925
  • [27] Incommensurability and cost-benefit analysis
    Adler, M
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW, 1998, 146 (05) : 1371 - 1418
  • [28] In Defence of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Ergas, Henry
    AGENDA-A JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND REFORM, 2009, 16 (03) : 31 - 40
  • [29] Cost-benefit analysis: examples
    Linn, Mott
    BOTTOM LINE, 2011, 24 (01): : 68 - 72
  • [30] Liraglutide: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Schoeffski, O.
    Mentrup, S.
    Lund, N.
    Pfuetzner, A.
    DIABETES STOFFWECHSEL UND HERZ, 2010, 19 (03): : 177 - 184