An angulated common bile duct predisposes to recurrent symptomatic bile duct stones after endoscopic stone extraction

被引:93
|
作者
Keizman, D.
Shalom, M. I.
Konikoff, F. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Minerva Ctr Cholesterol Gallstones & Lipid Metab, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, IL-64239 Tel Aviv, Israel
[3] Meir Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, IL-44281 Kefar Sava, Israel
关键词
bile duct angulation; ERCP; recurrent bile duct stones;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-005-0656-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction are standard procedures for the removal of bile duct stones. Stone recurrence can, however, occur in up to 25% of cases. Risk factors have been poorly defined, but are believed to be related to bile stasis. This study investigated whether an angulated common bile duct (CBD) that may predispose to bile stasis influences symptomatic stone recurrence after successful endoscopic therapy. Methods: This study included 232 consecutive patients (mean age, 64.1 years; 86 men) who had undergone therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for bile duct stones. Data from the follow-up period (36 +/- 17 months) were obtained from medical records and patient questioning. Common bile duct angulation and diameter were measured from the cholangiogram after stone removal. Results: Symptomatic bile duct stones recurred in 16% of the patients (36/232). Three independent risk factors were identified by multivariate analysis: an angulated CBD (angle, <= 145 degrees; relative risk [RR], 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.2-12.5; p = 0.0002), a dilated CBD (diameter, >= 13 mm; RR, 2.6; 95% Cl, 1.2-5.7; p = 0.017), and a previous open cholecystectomy (RR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.9; p = 0.0117). Gender, age, urgency of procedure, or a periampullary diverticulum did not influence the recurrence rate. Conclusions: Angulation of the CBD (<= 145 degrees) on endoscopic cholanglography, a dilated CBD, and a previous open cholecystectomy are independent risk factors for symptomatic recurrence of bile duct stones. The findings support the role of bile stasis in stone recurrence. Further studies using these data prospectively to identify high-risk patients are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1594 / 1599
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy
    Ando, T
    Tsuyuguchi, T
    Okugawa, T
    Saito, M
    Ishihara, T
    Yamaguchi, T
    Saisho, H
    GUT, 2003, 52 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [42] ENDOSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    LUX, G
    RIEMANN, JF
    SCHEUBEL, R
    HOCHBERGER, J
    FORTSCHRITTE DER MEDIZIN, 1985, 103 (38) : 888 - 892
  • [43] ENDOSCOPIC LITHOTRIPSY OF COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    BETHGE, N
    HINTZE, RE
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 1987, 25 (02): : 119 - 123
  • [44] Stones in the common bile duct
    Beall, FC
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1938, 107 : 238 - 241
  • [45] Advances in the endoscopic management of common bile duct stones
    Trikudanathan, Guru
    Arain, Mustafa A.
    Attam, Rajeev
    Freeman, Martin L.
    NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 11 (09) : 535 - 544
  • [46] Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones
    Dollhopf, Markus
    Schmetkamp, Henning
    MINERVA GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 68 (02): : 144 - 153
  • [47] Advances in the endoscopic management of common bile duct stones
    Guru Trikudanathan
    Mustafa A. Arain
    Rajeev Attam
    Martin L. Freeman
    Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2014, 11 : 535 - 544
  • [48] Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones
    Trikudanathan, Guru
    Navaneethan, Udayakumar
    Parsi, Mansour A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (02) : 165 - 173
  • [49] ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT OF DIFFICULT COMMON BILE DUCT STONES
    Katanuma, Akio
    Maguchi, Hiroyuki
    Osanai, Manabu
    Takahashi, Kuniyuki
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 22 : S90 - S97
  • [50] Common bile duct stones
    Ilias Scotiniotis
    William B. Long
    Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology, 2000, 3 (2) : 133 - 140