The dynamics of technology diffusion and the impacts of climate policy instruments in the decarbonisation of the global electricity sector

被引:68
|
作者
Mercure, J. -F. [1 ]
Pollitt, H. [2 ]
Chewpreecha, U. [2 ]
Salas, P. [1 ]
Foley, A. M. [1 ]
Holden, P. B. [3 ]
Edwards, N. R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Land Econ, 4CMR, Cambridge CB3 1EP, England
[2] Cambridge Econometr Ltd, Cambridge CB1 2HT, England
[3] Open Univ, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Climate policy; Emissions reductions pathways; Climate change mitigation; Energy systems modelling; ECONOMICS APPROACH; ENERGY; MODEL; TRANSITIONS; TARGETS; STABILIZATION; SCENARIOS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2014.06.029
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper presents an analysis of climate policy instruments for the decarbonisation of the global electricity sector in a non-equilibrium economic and technology diffusion perspective. Energy markets are driven by innovation, path-dependent technology choices and diffusion. However, conventional optimisation models lack detail on these aspects and have limited ability to address the effectiveness of policy interventions because they do not represent decision-making. As a result, known effects of technology lock-ins are liable to be underestimated. In contrast, our approach places investor decision-making at the core of the analysis and investigates how it drives the diffusion of low-carbon technology in a highly disaggregated, hybrid, global macroeconometric model, FIT:Power-E3MG. Ten scenarios to 2050 of the electricity sector in 21 regions exploring combinations of electricity policy instruments are analysed, including their climate impacts. We show that in a diffusion and path-dependent perspective, the impact of combinations of policies does not correspond to the sum of impacts of individual instruments: synergies exist between policy tools. We argue that the carbon price required to break the current fossil technology lock-in can be much lower when combined with other policies, and that a 90% decarbonisation of the electricity sector by 2050 is affordable without early scrapping. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 700
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Modeling the impacts of climate change on monthly commercial sector electricity consumption: A case of Suzhou, China
    Su, Zhenyu
    Zhou, Zhifan
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (04) : 1370 - 1381
  • [42] Global climate change mitigation technology diffusion: A network perspective
    Zhang, Jianhua
    Ballas, Dimitris
    Liu, Xiaolong
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 133
  • [43] Global Impacts of Climate Policy and Trade Agreements on Greenhouse Gas Emissions
    Balogh, Jeremias Mate
    Mizik, Tamas
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [44] Impacts of Trade Friction and Climate Policy on Global Energy Trade Network
    Shepard, Jun U.
    van Ruijven, Bas J.
    Zakeri, Behnam
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (17)
  • [45] Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options
    Pasqualetti, Martin J.
    ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2012, 102 (03) : 735 - 736
  • [46] Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options
    Topping, John C., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 32 (04) : 910 - 912
  • [47] Climate change and global energy security: Technology and policy options
    Tierney, Robert
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2012, 79 (06) : 1176 - 1177
  • [48] Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options
    White, Gregory
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2013, 13 (02) : 148 - 153
  • [49] Climate Change and Global Energy Security: Technology and Policy Options
    Cooper, Richard N.
    FOREIGN AFFAIRS, 2012, 91 (01) : 188 - 188
  • [50] Influence of climate change mitigation technology on global demands of water for electricity generation
    Kyle, Page
    Davies, Evan G. R.
    Dooley, James J.
    Smith, Steven J.
    Clarke, Leon E.
    Edmonds, James A.
    Hejazi, Mohamad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 13 : 112 - 123