Morphological generalization of Hebrew verb classes An elicited production study in native and non-native speakers

被引:2
|
作者
Farhy, Yael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Potsdam, Potsdam Res Inst Multilingualism, Haus 2,Campus Golm,Karl Liebknecht Str 24-25, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany
来源
MENTAL LEXICON | 2020年 / 15卷 / 02期
关键词
morphology; generalization; inflectional classes; Hebrew; non-native speakers; PAST TENSE; 2ND-LANGUAGE ACQUISITION; GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENT; PHONOLOGICAL MARKERS; ARTIFICIAL LANGUAGE; WORDS EVIDENCE; SINGLE-ROUTE; GENDER; AGREEMENT; INFLECTION;
D O I
10.1075/ml.19001.far
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The present work investigated how morphological generalization, namely the way speakers extend their knowledge to novel complex words, is influenced by sources of variability in language and speaker properties. For this purpose, the study focused on a Semitic language (Hebrew), characterized by unique non-concatenative morphology, and native ( L1) as well as non-native (L2) speakers. Two elicited production tasks tested what information sources speakers employ in verbal inflectional class generalization, i.e., in forming complex novel verbs. Phonological similarity was tested in Experiment 1 and argument structure in Experiment 2. The analysis focused on the two most common Hebrew inflectional classes, Paal and Piel, which also constituted the vast majority of responses in the two tasks. Unlike the commonly found outcomes in Romance inflectional class generalization, the results yielded, solely for Piel, a graded phonological similarity effect and a robust argument structure effect, i.e., more Piel responses in a direct object context than without. The L2 pattern partially differed from the L1: (i) argument structure effect for L2 speakers was weaker, and (ii) L2 speakers produced more Paal than Piel responses. The results are discussed within the framework of rule-based and input-based accounts.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 257
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Why non-native speakers sometimes outperform native speakers in agreement processing
    Lee, Eun-Kyoung Rosa
    Phillips, Colin
    BILINGUALISM-LANGUAGE AND COGNITION, 2023, 26 (01) : 152 - 164
  • [22] DEFICIENCY IN COMPREHENSION IN NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS
    ADKINS, PG
    TESOL QUARTERLY, 1969, 3 (03) : 197 - 201
  • [23] Primer for non-native speakers.
    Zimmer, P
    GEORGIA REVIEW, 2005, 59 (02): : 410 - 421
  • [24] Publishing in English for non-native speakers
    Scully, Crispian
    Jenkins, Sarah
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 42 (07) : 753 - 753
  • [25] Teaching and researching English accents in native and non-native speakers
    Saito, Kazuya
    WORLD ENGLISHES, 2015, 34 (02) : 293 - 295
  • [26] Teaching and Researching English Accents in Native and Non-native Speakers
    Chen, Hsueh Chu
    JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2016, 13 (04): : 395 - 396
  • [27] Neuropsychological Performance of Native versus Non-native English Speakers
    Kisser, Jason E.
    Wendell, Carrington R.
    Spencer, Robert J.
    Waldstein, Shari R.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 27 (07) : 749 - 755
  • [28] Speaking rate consistency in native and non-native speakers of English
    Baese-Berk, Melissa M.
    Morrill, Tuuli H.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2015, 138 (03): : EL223 - EL228
  • [29] A NOVEL APPROACH TO DETECTING NON-NATIVE SPEAKERS AND THEIR NATIVE LANGUAGE
    Omar, Mohamed Kamal
    Pelecanos, Jason
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, : 4398 - 4401
  • [30] Language Proficiency in Native and Non-native Speakers: Theory and Research
    Iwashita, Noriko
    LANGUAGE TESTING, 2018, 35 (02) : 319 - 322