Are aircraft acceleration-induced body forces effective on contaminant dispersion in passenger aircraft cabins?

被引:11
|
作者
Elmaghraby, Hossam A. [1 ]
Chiang, Yi Wai [1 ]
Aliabadi, Amir A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, RICH 2515, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
关键词
TURBULENCE MODELS; AIR-FLOW; SIMULATION; TRANSPORT; CFD;
D O I
10.1080/23744731.2019.1576457
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Numerical simulations for the effect of body forces due to aircraft acceleration on the airflow and contaminant dispersion in a model for a passenger aircraft cabin are performed in this study. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) was used as the in-cabin contaminant and served as a surrogate for cough particles in the size from 1.6 to 3.0 mu m. It was found that those body forces have a significant impact on the contaminant dispersion phenomena and concentrations, especially during the climb leg, where the time-integrated concentration was 2.4 to 2.8 times its counterpart during the steady level (cruise) flight case at the two monitoring locations for most of the simulation time. However, the exposure to the contaminant did not change appreciably during the descent leg. Air velocities, on the other hand, increased noticeably during the climb and descent legs, leading to evident changes in the airflow patterns, airflow circulation magnitude, and, at some locations, airflow circulation directions. The current study has limitations, requiring detailed calculations while considering parametric variations. The findings warrant a closer investigation into the effects of body forces due to aircraft acceleration on the airflow and contaminant dispersion in various passenger aircraft cabins.
引用
收藏
页码:858 / 872
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Normal and extreme aircraft accelerations and the effects on exposure to expiratory airborne contaminant inside commercial aircraft cabins A technical note in response to: "Are aircraft acceleration-induced body forces effective on contaminant dispersion in passenger aircraft cabins?" and "Airflow design and source control strategies for reducing airborne contaminant exposure in passenger aircraft cabins during the climb leg" (2019) in Sci. Technol. Built En.
    Elmaghraby, Hossam A.
    Chiang, Yi Wai
    Aliabadi, Amir A.
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 26 (07) : 924 - 927
  • [2] Indoor air quality: Recommendations relevant to aircraft passenger cabins
    Hocking, MB
    AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1998, 59 (07): : 446 - 454
  • [3] Odour-sensitive passenger comfort in small aircraft cabins
    Nasoulis, C. P.
    Mantziou, S.
    Gkoutzamanis, V. G.
    Kalfas, A. I.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 128 (1321): : 429 - 440
  • [4] Airborne exposure patterns from a passenger source in aircraft cabins
    Bennett, James S.
    Jones, Byron W.
    Hosni, Mohammad H.
    Zhang, Yuanhui
    Topmiller, Jennifer L.
    Dietrich, Watts L.
    HVAC&R RESEARCH, 2013, 19 (08): : 962 - 973
  • [6] Viral Particle Dispersion and Viability in Commercial Aircraft Cabins
    Lynch, John A.
    Bennett, James S.
    Jones, Byron W.
    Hosni, Mohammad H.
    2018 ASHRAE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2018,
  • [7] Airflow design and source control strategies for reducing airborne contaminant exposure in passenger aircraft cabins during the climb leg
    Elmaghraby, Hossam A.
    Chiang, Yi Wai
    Aliabadi, Amir Abbas
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 26 (07) : 901 - 923
  • [8] Passenger thermal comfort and behavior: a field investigation in commercial aircraft cabins
    Cui, W.
    Wu, T.
    Ouyang, Q.
    Zhu, Y.
    INDOOR AIR, 2017, 27 (01) : 94 - 103
  • [9] ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO-SMOKE IN PASSENGER CABINS OF COMMERCIAL AIRCRAFT - RESPONSE
    REPACE, JL
    LOWREY, AH
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (18) : 1425 - 1426
  • [10] Predicting airflow distribution and contaminant transport in aircraft cabins with a simplified gasper model
    You, Ruoyu
    Liu, Wei
    Chen, Jun
    Lin, Chao-Hsin
    Wei, Daniel
    Chen, Qingyan
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION, 2016, 9 (06) : 699 - 708