Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing in Germany

被引:9
|
作者
Liehr, Thomas [1 ]
Harutyunyan, Tigran [2 ]
Williams, Heather [3 ]
Weise, Anja [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Schiller Univ, Jena Univ Hosp, Inst Human Genet, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[2] Yerevan State Univ, Dept Genet & Cytol, Yerevan 0001, Armenia
[3] Tempus Labs Inc, Chicago, IL 60654 USA
关键词
first trimester-screening (FTS); teratogen effects; multigenetic diseases; pregnant woman perspective; false-positive; false-negative; knowledge of specialists and public; RISK; DNA; AMNIOCENTESIS; ANEUPLOIDIES; CHALLENGES; TRISOMY-13; DIAGNOSIS; UPDATE; CELLS;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12112816
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In the short 10 years following the introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), it has been adapted in many countries around the world as a standard screening test. In this review, this development was analyzed with a special focus on Germany. As a result, it can be stated that all known advantages of NIPT apart from "compensating for having no access to centers offering invasive diagnostics" are valid for Germany. In addition, following a review of the international literature, all documented issues with NIPT are also observed in Germany. However, the German Gene Diagnostics Act (GenDG) addresses a number of these issues, for example, the regulations by GenDG hamper induced abortions, based exclusively on an abnormal NIPT result. At the same time, GenDG has created new problems, as a possible collusion between the "right not to know with regard to parts of the examination result" may occur, or that the sex of the fetus must not be reported to the pregnant woman before the 12th week of gestation. Main conclusions drawn are that appropriate training and the continuing education of the physicians providing NIPT-related counseling are needed, as well as the provision of balanced and comprehensive information for the pregnant woman or the couple that is imperative.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Insurance and geographic variations in non-invasive prenatal testing
    Ellison, Jacqueline
    Wang, Catharine
    Yarrington, Christina
    Connors, Philip
    Hanchate, Amresh
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2022, 42 (08) : 1004 - 1007
  • [42] Patents and non-invasive prenatal testing: Is there cause for concern?
    Hawkins, Naomi
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2020, 47 (05) : 655 - 667
  • [43] Reply to the letter: "Comments on non-invasive prenatal testing"
    Manegold-Brauer, Gwendolin
    Geipel, Annegret
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 292 (04) : 715 - 716
  • [44] Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: Ethics and Policy Considerations
    Vanstone, Meredith
    King, Carol
    de Vrijer, Barbra
    Nisker, Jeff
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2014, 36 (06) : 515 - 526
  • [45] Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues explored
    de Jong, Antina
    Dondorp, Wybo J.
    de Die-Smulders, Christine E. M.
    Frints, Suzanne G. M.
    de Wert, Guido M. W. R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2010, 18 (03) : 272 - 277
  • [46] Non-invasive prenatal testing for everybody or contingent screening?
    van der Meij, Karuna R. M.
    Henneman, Lidewij
    Sistermans, Erik A.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 43 (04) : 443 - 447
  • [47] Reply to the letter: “Comments on non-invasive prenatal testing”
    Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer
    Annegret Geipel
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2015, 292 : 715 - 716
  • [48] Non-invasive Prenatal Testing: The Problem with "Fast Cars"
    Snelling, Jeanne
    Kerruish, Nikki
    Lenagh-Glue, Jessie
    JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2016, 24 (01) : 203 - 220
  • [49] The continuing saga of patents and non-invasive prenatal testing
    Hawkins, Naomi
    Nicol, Dianne
    Chandrasekharan, Subhashini
    Cook-Deegan, Robert
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2019, 39 (06) : 441 - 447
  • [50] Current status of non-invasive prenatal testing in Japan
    Samura, Osamu
    Sekizawa, Akihiko
    Suzumori, Nobuhiro
    Sasaki, Aiko
    Wada, Seiji
    Hamanoue, Haruka
    Hirahara, Fumiki
    Sawai, Hideaki
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    Yamada, Takahiro
    Miura, Kiyonori
    Masuzaki, Hideaki
    Nakayama, Setsuko
    Okai, Takashi
    Kamei, Yoshimasa
    Namba, Akira
    Murotsuki, Jun
    Tanemoto, Tomohiro
    Fukushima, Akimune
    Haino, Kazufumi
    Tairaku, Shinya
    Matsubara, Keiichi
    Maeda, Kazuhisa
    Kaji, Takashi
    Ogawa, Masanobu
    Osada, Hisao
    Nishizawa, Haruki
    Okamoto, Yoko
    Kanagawa, Takeshi
    Kakigano, Aiko
    Kitagawa, Michihiro
    Ogawa, Masaki
    Izumi, Shunichiro
    Katagiri, Yukiko
    Takeshita, Naoki
    Kasai, Yasuyo
    Naruse, Katsuhiko
    Neki, Reiko
    Masuyama, Hisashi
    Hyodo, Maki
    Kawano, Yukie
    Ohba, Takashi
    Ichizuka, Kiyotake
    Kido, Yasuhiro
    Fukao, Toshiyuki
    Miharu, Norio
    Nagamatsu, Takeshi
    Watanabe, Atsushi
    Hamajima, Naoki
    Hirose, Masaya
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 43 (08) : 1245 - 1255