Evaluating the content validity of generic preference-based measures for use in Parkinson's disease

被引:10
|
作者
Kuspinar, Ayse [1 ]
Mate, Kedar [2 ]
Lafontaine, Anne-Louise [3 ,4 ]
Mayo, Nancy [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Sch Rehabil Sci, 1400 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 1C7, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Res Inst, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Neurol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Parkinson disease; Quality of life; Patient reported outcome measures; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NONMOTOR SYMPTOMS; HEALTH; MULTIATTRIBUTE;
D O I
10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.01.014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Generic preference-based measures are used to assess the cost-utility of different interventions in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the difficulty of using them in people with a particular health condition is that these measures may not encapsulate all of the domains that are impacted by the disease. Objective: To contribute evidence towards the content validity of generic preference-based measures in people with PD. Methods: Participants with PD were interviewed on a personalized measure of quality of life, the Patient Generated Index (PGI). The domains identified with the PGI were then categorized using the WHO's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. The extent to which the generic measures (EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI II, and HUI III) included domains important to persons with PD was qualitatively evaluated. Results: The study included seventy-six participants with PD (mean age 69 years). Dexterity, the top domain nominated by participants, was only included in 1 out of 4 of the generic measures. Fatigue, another commonly reported problem, was not included in 3 out of 4 measures. Sleep, dyskinesia and bowel/bladder problems were not included in any of the measures. Conclusion: Content validity is an essential step in the evaluation of whether a questionnaire truly measures the construct it purports to measure, in this case the construct being health related quality of life (HRQL). This study evaluated the content validity of the EQ-5D-5L, SF-6D, HUI II and HUI III in people with PD, and demonstrated that several important PD specific domains are missing from these measures.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 116
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life
    Lenert, L
    Kaplan, RM
    MEDICAL CARE, 2000, 38 (09) : 138 - 150
  • [32] COMPARING GENERIC AND CANCER-SPECIFIC PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURES IN THE CANCER PATIENT JOURNEY
    Pickard, A. S.
    Shaw, J.
    Ramos-Goni, J. M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (12) : S503 - S503
  • [33] USING DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS TO VALUE GENERIC PREFERENCE-BASED MEASURES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Mulhern, B.
    Norman, R.
    Viney, R.
    Stolk, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A95 - A96
  • [34] Generic Preference-based Measures for Low Back Pain: Which of Them Should Be Used?
    Finch, Aureliano Paolo
    Dritsaki, Melina
    Jommi, Claudio
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (06) : E364 - E374
  • [35] Mapping clinical outcomes to generic preference-based outcome measures: development and comparison of methods
    Alava, Monica Hernandez
    Wailoo, Allan
    Pudney, Stephen
    Gray, Laura
    Manua, Andrea
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2020, 24 (34) : 1 - +
  • [36] THE MAPS REPORTING STATEMENT FOR STUDIES MAPPING ONTO GENERIC PREFERENCE-BASED OUTCOME MEASURES
    Petrou, S.
    Rivero-Arias, O.
    Dakin, H.
    Longworth, L.
    Oppe, M.
    Froud, R.
    Gray, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A715 - A716
  • [37] Using generic preference-based measures in mental health: psychometric validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Mukuria, Clara
    Barkham, Michael
    Knapp, Martin
    Byford, Sarah
    Soeteman, Djora
    Brazier, John
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 205 (03) : 236 - 243
  • [38] Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
    Katie Breheny
    William Hollingworth
    Rebecca Kandiyali
    Padraig Dixon
    Abi Loose
    Pippa Craggs
    Mariusz Grzeda
    John Sparrow
    Quality of Life Research, 2020, 29 : 1935 - 1946
  • [39] E-QALY: face validity testing the items for a new generic preference-based measure
    Carlton, Jill
    Connell, Janice
    Peasgood, Tessa
    Mukuria, Clara
    Ludwig, Kristina
    Marten, Ole
    Kreimeier, Simone
    Engel, Lidia
    Yang, Zhihao
    Belizan, Maria
    Rodriguez, Rocio
    Monteiro, Andrea
    Kuharic, Maja
    Mulhern, Brendan
    Pickard, A. Simon
    Luo, Nan
    Augustovski, Federico
    Greiner, Wolfgang
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (SUPPL 1) : S4 - S5
  • [40] Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients
    Breheny, Katie
    Hollingworth, William
    Kandiyali, Rebecca
    Dixon, Padraig
    Loose, Abi
    Craggs, Pippa
    Grzeda, Mariusz
    Sparrow, John
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (07) : 1935 - 1946