Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study

被引:31
|
作者
Pitta, Joao [1 ]
Hjerppe, Jenni [2 ,3 ]
Burkhardt, Felix [1 ]
Fehmer, Vincent [1 ]
Mojon, Philippe [1 ]
Sailer, Irena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Univ Clin Dent Med, Div Fixed Prosthodont & Biomat, 1 Rue Michel Servet, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp HUH, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Dis, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Turku, Dept Prosthodont & Stomatognath Physiol, Turku, Finland
关键词
crowns; dental abutments; dental implants; fracture load; metal ceramic; monolithic; zircona; ZIRCONIA IMPLANT ABUTMENTS; ALL-CERAMIC CROWNS; LITHIUM DISILICATE; CLINICAL-PERFORMANCE; FRACTURE STRENGTH; DIGITAL WORKFLOW; BENDING MOMENTS; SINGLE CROWNS; RESTORATIONS; TOOTH;
D O I
10.1111/clr.13693
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives To evaluate mechanical stability (survival and complication rates) and bending moments of different all-ceramic monolithic restorations bonded to titanium bases (hybrid abutment-crowns) or to customized titanium abutments compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns (PFM) after thermo-mechanical aging. Material and Methods Sixty conical connection implants (4.3 mm-diameter) were divided in five groups (n = 12): PFM using gold abutment (GAbut-PFM), lithium disilicate crown bonded to customized titanium abutment (TAbut+LDS), lithium disilicate abutment-crown bonded to titanium base (TiBase+LDS), zirconia abutment-crown bonded to titanium base (TiBase+ZR), polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network (PICN) abutment-crown bonded to titanium base (TiBase+PICN). Simultaneous thermocycling (5 degrees-55 degrees C) and chewing simulation (1,200,000-cycles, 49 N, 1.67 Hz) were applied. Catastrophic and non-catastrophic events were evaluated under light microscope, and survival and complication rates were calculated. Specimens that survived aging were loaded until failure and bending moments were calculated. Results Survival rates after aging were 100% (TAbut+LDS, TiBase+LDS), 91.7% (GA-PFM), 66.7% (TiBase+ZR) and 58.3% (TiBase+PICN) and differed among the groups (p = .006). Non-catastrophic events as screw loosening (GA-PFM) and loss of retention or micro-/macro-movement (TiBase groups) were observed. Complication rates varied among the groups (p < .001). TiBase+PICN had lower bending moment than all the other groups (p < .001). Conclusions Hybrid abutment-crowns made of lithium disilicate can be an alternative to PFM-based restorations, although concerns regarding the bonded interface between the titanium base and abutment-crown can be raised. PICN and zirconia may not be recommended due to its inferior mechanical and bonding outcomes, respectively. Titanium customized abutment with bonded lithium disilicate crown appears to be the most stable combination.
引用
收藏
页码:222 / 232
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Fit of pressed crowns fabricated from two CAD-CAM wax pattern process plans: A comparative in vitro study
    Shamseddine, Loubna
    Mortada, Rola
    Rifai, Khaldoun
    Chidiac, Jose Johann
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 118 (01): : 49 - 54
  • [22] Retention of CAD/CAM All-Ceramic Crowns on Prefabricated Implant Abutments: An In Vitro Comparative Study of Luting Agents and Abutment Surface Area
    Carnaggio, Thomas V.
    Conrad, Robert
    Engelmeier, Robert L.
    Gerngross, Peter
    Paravina, Rade
    Perezous, Leticia
    Powers, John M.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2012, 21 (07): : 523 - 528
  • [23] Clinical outcomes of single implant supported crowns utilising the titanium base abutment: A 7.5-year prospective cohort study
    Smirani, Rawen
    Chantler, Jennifer G. M.
    Endres, Janina
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Naenni, Nadja
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 149
  • [24] Mechanical stability of posterior implant-supported monolithic zirconia cantilever on titanium-base abutments. An in vitro study
    Riera, Carme
    Karasan, Duygu
    Sailer, Irena
    Mojon, Phillipe
    Fehmer, Vincent
    Pitta, Joao
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (08) : 1042 - 1053
  • [25] Retentive Strength of CAD/CAM-Fabricated All-Ceramic Crowns Luted on Titanium Implant Abutments Using Different Ceramic Materials and Luting Agents: An In Vitro Study
    Bjelopavlovic, Monika
    Weyhrauch, Michael
    Scheller, Herbert
    Wentaschek, Stefan
    Lehmann, Karl Martin
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (19)
  • [26] Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: A 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study
    De Angelis, Paolo
    Passarelli, Pier Carmine
    Gasparini, Giulio
    Boniello, Roberto
    D'Amato, Giuseppe
    De Angelis, Silvio
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 123 (02): : 252 - 256
  • [27] Marginal and Internal Accuracy of CAD/CAM all Ceramic Crowns Fabricated with two Types of Direct Digital Impression Systems (An In Vitro study)
    Al Assal, Adnan R.
    Ibraheem, Adel F.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2018, 6 (02): : 391 - 395
  • [28] In vitro performance of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns: Influence of patient-specific tooth-coloured abutments with titanium adhesive bases
    Rosentritt, Martin
    Rembs, Andreas
    Behr, Michael
    Hahnel, Sebastian
    Preis, Verena
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2015, 43 (07) : 839 - 845
  • [29] Zirconia Cantilever Fixed Dental Prostheses Supported by One or Two Implants: An In Vitro Study on Mechanical Stability and Technical Outcomes
    Karasan, Duygu
    Canay, Senay
    Sailer, Irena
    Att, Wael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (04) : 748 - 755
  • [30] CAD/CAM-milled versus conventionally cast secondary crowns fabricated from high noble metal alloy: an in vitro study of retentive force
    Boese, Mats Wernfried Heinrich
    Etzlinge, Elisabeth
    Erdelt, Kurt
    Schweige, Josef
    Beuer, Florian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2021, 24 (04) : 393 - 403