Benefits of small projects team initiative

被引:10
|
作者
Dunston, PS [1 ]
Reed, AG
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] USA, Corps Engineers, Seattle, WA 98124 USA
关键词
Structural design - Cost effectiveness - Personnel - Scheduling - Engineers - Statistical methods - Sensitivity analysis - Cost benefit analysis;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:1(22)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Ordinarily, minimum design costs are associated with all construction projects regardless of their size or complexity Consequently, the design costs are a higher percentage of the overall costs for small projects. This paper presents an analysis of the effectiveness of the Small Projects Team initiative (SPTI) developed and implemented by the Seattle district of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. SPTI is intended to lower the design costs on construction projects where the design scope is simple and/or the administrative and construction processes are somewhat routine. The Small Projects team consists of representatives from contracting, construction, engineering, and project management. This team produces specifications for selected projects with simplified design, design by shop drawing, and innovative contracting arrangements. Data from 77 projects completed within the Seattle district are compared with the data from 146 pn-SPTI jobs. Statistically confirmed benefits include reduced design costs and reduced schedule growth (when user requested changes are excluded). Lower median change-order rates are not confirmed. but further analysis of the nature of changes is recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Ecological initiative budgeting projects
    V. Vagin, V.
    Paksivatkina, V. A.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2023, (04): : 191 - 198
  • [12] The benefits of arguing in a team
    Tambe, M
    Jung, H
    AI MAGAZINE, 1999, 20 (04) : 85 - 92
  • [13] Emotions and team projects and processes
    Peslak, Alan
    TEAM PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 11 (7-8) : 251 - +
  • [14] Evaluating individuals in team projects
    Wilkins, DE
    Lawhead, PB
    SIGCSE 2000: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-FIRST SIGCSE TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2000, 32 (01): : 172 - 175
  • [15] Team Projects in Computing Education
    Boerstler, Juergen
    Hilburn, Thomas B.
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTING EDUCATION, 2015, 15 (04):
  • [16] Teamwork Quality and Team Performance: Exploring Differences Between Small and Large Agile Projects
    Lindsjorn, Yngve
    Bergersen, Gunnar R.
    Dingsoyr, Torgeir
    Sjoberg, Dag I. K.
    AGILE PROCESSES IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND EXTREME PROGRAMMING, XP 2018, 2018, 314 : 267 - 274
  • [17] Team Projects in Computing Education
    Boerstler, Juergen
    Hilburn, Thomas B.
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTING EDUCATION, 2016, 16 (02):
  • [18] Evaluating individuals in team projects
    Wilkins, Dawn E.
    Lawhead, Pamela B.
    SIGCSE Bulletin (Association for Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education), 2000, : 172 - 175
  • [19] Team reflexivity in innovative projects
    Hoegl, M
    Parboteeah, KP
    R & D MANAGEMENT, 2006, 36 (02) : 113 - 125
  • [20] Software Development Framework on Small Team using Agile Framework For Small Projects (AFSP) with Neural Network Estimation
    Septian, Wuwanjie
    Gata, Windu
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION & COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS (ICTS), 2017, : 259 - 264