Complications of Wise-Pattern Compared With Vertical Scar Mastopexy/Breast Reduction in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery

被引:8
|
作者
Schaverien, Mark V. [1 ]
Deigni, Olivier A. [1 ]
Adamson, Karri A. [1 ]
Robb, Geoffrey L. [1 ]
Kuerer, Henry [2 ]
Smith, Benjamin D. [3 ]
Garvey, Patrick B. [1 ]
Hassid, Victor J. [1 ]
Villa, Mark T. [1 ]
Baumann, Donald P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Plast Surg, Unit 1488,1400 Pressler St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Surg, Dept Breast Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
oncoplastic; breast-conserving surgery; Wise pattern; vertical scar; outcomes; complications;
D O I
10.1097/SAP.0000000000002392
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) is most commonly performed using established or modified mastopexy/breast reduction techniques. Although the comparative complication profiles of Wise-pattern mastopexy/breast reduction techniques compared with vertical scar techniques are well understood, outcomes in the setting of OBCS are unknown. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of all patients that underwent OBCS using mastopexy/breast reduction techniques at a single center over a 6-year period. Patients who underwent Wise-pattern techniques were compared with those who underwent vertical scar techniques. Demographic, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. Descriptive statistics were used, and multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between these multiple variables and complications. Results: Of 413 eligible patients, 278 patients (67.3%) received a Wise-pattern technique and 135 (32.7%) underwent a vertical scar technique. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the Wise-pattern than in the vertical scar group (30.6% vs 18.5%, respectively; P = 0.012), as was the major complication rate (11.9% vs 4.4%; P = 0.011) including need for additional surgery for complications (6.8% vs 1.5%; P = 0.029). Complications resulted in a delay to any adjuvant therapy in 20 patients (4.8%); however, the difference between the groups was not significant (6.1% for Wise pattern vs 2.2% for vertical scar; P = 0.098). In a multivariable logistic model, use of a Wise-pattern technique (odds ratio, 0.37 [95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.99]; P = 0.049) was a significant predictor of major complications. Conclusions: The Wise-pattern mastopexy/breast reduction OBCS technique was associated with a significantly higher complication and major complication rate than vertical scar techniques. The findings should be considered during choice of surgical technique in oncoplastic breast conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 607
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Breast MRI in DCIS size estimation, breast-conserving surgery and oncoplastic breast surgery
    Bartram, Alexander
    Gilbert, Fiona
    Thompson, Alastair
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Agrawal, Amit
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2021, 94
  • [22] Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery is Associated with a Lower Risk of Surgical Site Complications Compared to Standard Breast Conserving Surgery
    Crown, A.
    Scovel, L.
    Scott, E.
    Wechter, D. G.
    Grumley, J. W.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 : S64 - S64
  • [23] Ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery compared to conventional breast-conserving surgery
    Boeer, Bettina
    Obermoser, Jennifer
    Marx, Mario
    Schoenfisch, Birgitt
    Grube, Marcel
    Roehm, Carmen
    Helms, Gisela
    Fugunt, Regina
    Hartkopf, Andreas D.
    Brucker, Sara Y.
    Hahn, Markus
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2025, 46 (02): : 162 - 169
  • [24] Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery is associated with a lower rate of surgical site complications compared to standard breast conserving surgery
    Crown, Angelena
    Scovel, Lauren G.
    Rocha, Flavio G.
    Scott, Elliot J.
    Wechter, Debra G.
    Grumley, Janie W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 217 (01): : 138 - 141
  • [25] Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery According to Tumor Location
    Canturk, Nuh Zafer
    Simsek, Turgay
    Gurdal, Sibel Ozkan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BREAST HEALTH, 2021, 17 (03) : 220 - 233
  • [26] Radiation Boost Is Feasible in Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Fluke, Laura
    Orozco, Javier
    Stern, Stacey
    Wollman, Robert
    Grumley, Janie
    Fancher, Crystal
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2024, 239 (05) : S56 - S57
  • [27] Is radiation boost feasible in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery?
    Fancher, Crystal
    Chun, Diane
    Mandelbaum, Ava
    Stern, Stacey
    Orozco, Javier
    Wollman, Robert
    Grumley, Janie
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 286 - 287
  • [28] Comparison of Outcomes of Standard and Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery
    Gulcelik, Mehmet Ali
    Dogan, Lutfi
    Yuksel, Murat
    Camlibel, Mithat
    Ozaslan, Cihangir
    Reis, Erhan
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2013, 16 (02) : 193 - 197
  • [29] Fat necrosis after breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery
    Nakada, Haruka
    Inoue, Masayuki
    Furuya, Kazushige
    Watanabe, Hideki
    Ikegame, Kou
    Nakayama, Yuko
    Ohmori, Masato
    Nakagomi, Hiroshi
    BREAST CANCER, 2019, 26 (01) : 125 - 130
  • [30] Fat necrosis after breast-conserving oncoplastic surgery
    Haruka Nakada
    Masayuki Inoue
    Kazushige Furuya
    Hideki Watanabe
    Kou Ikegame
    Yuko Nakayama
    Masato Ohmori
    Hiroshi Nakagomi
    Breast Cancer, 2019, 26 : 125 - 130