Telemedicine in rheumatology: a mixed methods study exploring acceptability, preferences and experiences among patients and clinicians

被引:40
|
作者
Sloan, Melanie [1 ]
Lever, Elliott [2 ]
Harwood, Rupert [3 ]
Gordon, Caroline [4 ]
Wincup, Chris [5 ]
Blane, Moira [3 ]
Brimicombe, James [1 ]
Lanyon, Peter [6 ]
Howard, Paul [7 ]
Sutton, Stephen [1 ]
D'Cruz, David [8 ]
Naughton, Felix [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[2] Northwick Pk Hosp & Clin Res Ctr, Dept Rheumatol, Harrow, Middx, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Patient & Publ Involvement Rheumatol Res Grp, Inst Publ Hlth, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Rheumatol Res Grp, Inst Inflammat & Ageing, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] UCL, Dept Rheumatol, London, England
[6] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Populat & Lifespan Sci, Nottingham, England
[7] LUPUS UK, Romford, Essex, England
[8] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Louise Coote Lupus Unit, London, England
[9] Univ East Anglia, Behav & Implementat Sci Grp, Sch Hlth Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
telemedicine; rheumatology; patient-physician interactions; digital technology in medicine; pandemic; mixed-methods; rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases; TELERHEUMATOLOGY; COVID-19; TOOL;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/keab796
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The Covid-19 pandemic necessitated a rapid global transition towards telemedicine; yet much remains unknown about telemedicine's acceptability and safety in rheumatology. To help address this gap and inform practice, this study investigated rheumatology patient and clinician experiences and views of telemedicine. Methods Sequential mixed methodology combined analysis of surveys and in-depth interviews. Between and within-group differences in views of telemedicine were examined for patients and clinicians using t-tests. Results Surveys (patients n = 1340, clinicians n = 111) and interviews (patients n = 31, clinicians n = 29) were completed between April 2021 and July 2021. The majority of patients were from the UK (96%) and had inflammatory arthritis (32%) or lupus (32%). Patients and clinicians rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face consultations in almost all categories, although >60% found it more convenient. Building trusting medical relationships and assessment accuracy were great concerns (93% of clinicians and 86% of patients rated telemedicine as worse than face-to-face for assessment accuracy). Telemedicine was perceived to have increased misdiagnoses, inequalities and barriers to accessing care. Participants reported highly disparate telemedicine delivery and responsiveness from primary and secondary care. Although rheumatology clinicians highlighted the importance of a quick response to flaring patients, only 55% of patients were confident that their rheumatology department would respond within 48 hours. Conclusion Findings indicate a preference for face-to-face consultations. Some negative experiences may be due to the pandemic rather than telemedicine specifically, although the risk of greater diagnostic inaccuracies using telemedicine is unlikely to be fully resolved. Training, choice, careful patient selection, and further consultation with clinicians and patients is required to increase telemedicine's acceptability and safety.
引用
收藏
页码:2262 / 2274
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study
    Enoch, Jamie
    Ghulakhszian, Arevik
    Sekhon, Mandeep
    Crabb, David P.
    Taylor, Deanna J.
    Dinah, Christiana
    [J]. EYE, 2023, 37 (17) : 3634 - 3642
  • [32] Exploring User Needs and Preferences for Mobile Apps for Sleep Disturbance: Mixed Methods Study
    Aji, Melissa
    Gordon, Christopher
    Peters, Dorian
    Bartlett, Delwyn
    Calvo, Rafael A.
    Naqshbandi, Khushnood
    Glozier, Nick
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2019, 6 (05):
  • [33] Exploring patient acceptability of emerging intravitreal therapies for geographic atrophy: A mixed-methods study
    Jamie Enoch
    Arevik Ghulakhszian
    Mandeep Sekhon
    David P. Crabb
    Deanna J. Taylor
    Christiana Dinah
    [J]. Eye, 2023, 37 : 3634 - 3642
  • [34] EXPERIENCES OF MOTIVATION TO BE ACTIVE AMONG AMPUTEES: A SEQUENTIAL MIXED METHODS STUDY
    Olsen, Sara
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 56 (SUPP 1) : S275 - S275
  • [35] Patients' views of a fetal ultrasound telemedicine service: A mixed methods evaluation study
    Lie, M.
    Snaith, V
    Bidmead, E.
    Marshall, A.
    Robson, S. C.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 40 - 40
  • [36] PCSK9 INHIBITOR PREFERENCES AND EXPERIENCES OF PATIENTS AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS IN DECISION MAKING: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Mulder, Janneke W. C. M.
    Galema-Boers, Annette M. H.
    Redekop, Ken
    Kranenburg, Leonieke W.
    Van Lennep, Jeanine Roeters
    [J]. ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2024, 395
  • [37] The Preferences for Outpatient Clinic Appointment Reminders Among Rheumatology Patients
    O'Connor, Mortimer B.
    Bond, Ursula
    Saunders, Jean A.
    Casey, Pamela
    Mohammad, Ausaf
    O'Dwyer, Marie
    Daly, Nicola
    Regan, Michael J.
    Phelan, Mark J.
    [J]. JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2009, 15 (05) : 258 - 259
  • [38] Patients' Experiences of Living with Atrial Fibrillation: A Mixed Methods Study
    Stridsman, Marie
    Stromberg, Anna
    Hendriks, Jeroen
    Walfridsson, Ulla
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 2019
  • [39] DIALECT PREFERENCES AMONG THE SYRIAN REFUGEES IN JORDAN: A MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Fakhouri, Samaher
    Lah, Salasiah Che
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUSANTARA STUDIES-JONUS, 2024, 9 (02): : 106 - 130
  • [40] Experiences with Telemedicine for HIV Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Dini Harsono
    Yanhong Deng
    Sangyun Chung
    Lydia A. Barakat
    Gerald Friedland
    Jaimie P. Meyer
    Elizabeth Porter
    Merceditas Villanueva
    Michael S. Wolf
    Jessica E. Yager
    E. Jennifer Edelman
    [J]. AIDS and Behavior, 2022, 26 : 2099 - 2111