Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women

被引:56
|
作者
Nambiar, Arjun [1 ]
Cody, June D. [2 ]
Jeffery, Stephen T. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Morriston Hosp, Dept Urol, Ward H, Swansea SA6 6NL, W Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Cochrane Incontinence Review Grp, Foresterhill, AB, Canada
[3] Groote Schuur Hosp, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Univ Cape Town, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
关键词
FREE VAGINAL TAPE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EVALUATOR BLINDED MULTICENTER; TVT-SECUR PROCEDURE; STRESS-INCONTINENCE; TRANSOBTURATOR TAPE; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; COMPARING TVT; MINI-SLINGS; INSIDE-OUT;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Urinary incontinence has been shown to affect up to 50% of women. Studies in the United States have shown that up to 80% of these women have an element of stress urinary incontinence. Colposuspension and now mid-urethral slings have been shown to be effective in treating patients with stress incontinence. However, associated adverse events include bladder and bowel injury, groin pain and haematoma formation. This has led to the development of third-generation single-incision slings, also referred to as mini-slings. It should be noted that TVT-Secur (Gynecare, Bridgewater, NJ, USA) is one type of single-incision sling; it has been withdrawn from the market because of poor results. However, it is one of the most widely studied single-incision slings and was used in several of the trials included in this review. Despite its withdrawal from clinical use, it was decided that data pertaining to this sling should be included in the first iteration of this review, so that level 1a data are available in the literature to confirm its lack of efficacy. Objectives To assess the effectiveness of mini-sling procedures in women with urodynamic clinical stress or mixed urinary incontinence in terms of improved continence status, quality of life or adverse events. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and MEDLINE in process; we handsearched journals and conference proceedings (searched 6 February 2013) and searched ClinicalTrials.gov (searched 20 September 2012), the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (searched 20 September 2012) and the reference lists of relevant articles. Selection criteria Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials in women with urodynamic stress incontinence, symptoms of stress incontinence or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence, in which at least one trial arm involves one of the new single-incision slings. The definition of a single-incision sling is "a sling that does not involve either a retropubic or transobturator passage of the tape or trocar and involves only a single vaginal incision (i.e. no exit wounds in the groin or lower abdomen)." Data collection and analysis Three review authors assessed the methodological quality of potentially eligible trials and independently extracted data from the individual trials. Main results We identified 31 trials involving 3290 women. Some methodological flaws were observed in some trials; a summary of these is given in the 'Risk of bias in included studies' section. No studies compared single-incision slings versus no treatment, conservative treatment, colposuspension, laparoscopic procedures or traditional sub-urethral slings. Also no data on the comparison of single-incision slings versus retropubic mid-urethral slings (top-down approach) were available, but the review authors believe this did not affect the overall comparison versus retropubic mid-urethral slings. The types of single-incision slings included in this review were TVT-Secur (Gynecare), MiniArc (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, MN, USA), Ajust (C.R. Bard, Inc., Covington, GA, USA), Needleless (Mayumana Healthcare, Lisse, The Netherlands), Ophira (Promedon, Cordoba, Argentina), Tissue Fixation System (TFS PTY Ltd, Sydney, Australia) and CureMesh (D.Med. Co., Inc., Seoul, Korea). Women were more likely to remain incontinent after surgery with single-incision slings than with retropubic slings such as tension-free vaginal tape (TVT (TM)) (121/292, 41% vs 72/281, 26%; risk ratio (RR) 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 4.14). Duration of the operation was slightly shorter for single-incision slings but with higher risk of de novo urgency (RR 2.39, 95% CI 1.25 to 4.56). Four of five studies in the comparison included TVT-Secur as the single-incision sling. Single-incision slings resulted in higher incontinence rates compared with inside-out transobturator slings (30% vs 11%; RR 2.55, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.36). The adverse event profile was significantly worse, specifically consisting of higher risks of vaginal mesh exposure (RR 3.75, 95% CI 1.42 to 9.86), bladder/urethral erosion (RR 17.79, 95% CI 1.06 to 298.88) and operative blood loss (mean difference 18.79, 95% CI 3.70 to 33.88). Postoperative pain was less common with single-incision slings (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.43), and rates of long-term pain or discomfort were marginally lower, but the clinical significance of these differences is questionable. Most of these findings were derived from the trials involving TVT-Secur: Excluding the other trials showed that high risk of incontinence was principally associated with use of this device (RR 2.65, 95% CI 1.98 to 3.54). It has been withdrawn from clinical use. Evidence was insufficient to reveal a difference in incontinence rates with other single-incision slings compared with inside-out or outside-in transobturator slings. Duration of the operation was marginally shorter for single-incision slings compared with transobturator slings, but only by approximately two minutes and with significant heterogeneity in the comparison. Risks of postoperative and long-term groin/thigh pain were slightly lower with single-incision slings, but overall evidence was insufficient to suggest a significant difference in the adverse event profile for single-incision slings compared with transobturator slings. Evidence was also insufficient to permit a meaningful sensitivity analysis of the other single-incision slings compared with transobturator slings, as all confidence intervals were wide. The only significant differences were observed in rates of postoperative and long-term pain, and in duration of the operation, which marginally favoured single-incision slings. Overall results show that TVT-Secur is considerably inferior to retropubic and inside-out transobturator slings, but additional evidence is required to allow any reasonable comparison of other single-incision slings versus transobturator slings. When one single-incision sling was compared with another, evidence was insufficient to suggest a significant difference between any of the slings in any of the comparisons made. Authors' conclusions TVT-Secur is inferior to standard mid-urethral slings for the treatment of women with stress incontinence and has already been withdrawn from clinical use. Not enough evidence has been found on other single-incision slings compared with retropubic or transobturator slings to allow reliable comparisons. Additional adequately powered and high-quality trials with longer-term follow-up are required. Trials should clearly describe the fixation mechanism of these single-incisions slings: It is apparent that, although clubbed together as a single group, a significant difference in fixation mechanisms may influence outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:117
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Re: Single-incision Mini-slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women
    Braga, Andrea
    Serati, Maurizio
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (04) : 372 - 372
  • [33] Re: Single-Incision Mini-Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women
    Wein, Alan J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 208 (04): : 935 - 938
  • [34] Re: Single-incision Mini-slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women
    Cruz, Francisco
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 84 (01) : 139 - 139
  • [35] Minimally Invasive Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Prospective Comparative Analysis between Bulking Agent and Single-Incision Sling
    Campanella, Lorenzo
    Gabrielli, Gianluca
    Chiodo, Erika
    Stefanachi, Vitaliana
    Pennacchini, Ermelinda
    Grilli, Debora
    Grossi, Giovanni
    Cignini, Pietro
    Morciano, Andrea
    Zullo, Marzio Angelo
    Palazzetti, Pierluigi
    Rappa, Carlo
    Calcagno, Marco
    Spina, Vincenzo
    Cervigni, Mauro
    Schiavi, Michele Carlo
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (07)
  • [36] A Multicenter Prospective Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of a Single-incision Sling Procedure for Stress Urinary Incontinence
    Erickson, Ty
    Roovers, Jan-Paul
    Gheiler, Edward
    Parekh, Mitesh
    Parva, Mohamad
    Hanson, Craig
    McCrery, Rebecca
    Tu, Le Mai
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [37] Long-term efficacy and safety of Altis® single-incision sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence
    Gromicho, A.
    Kheir, Bou G.
    Araujo, D.
    Rodrigues, R.
    Pereira, D.
    Dias, J.
    Ferraz, L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S141 - S141
  • [38] The Comparison of Adjustable Single-incision Mini-Sling and Transobturator Tape for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
    Karatas, Suat
    Tekelioglu, Meltem
    Cift, Tayfur
    Temur, Muzaffer
    Yumru, Ayse Ender
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN MEDICINE-JAREM, 2020, 10 (01): : 36 - 40
  • [39] Miniarc® single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year clinical outcomes
    Michael J Kennelly
    Robert Moore
    John N. Nguyen
    James Lukban
    Steven Siegel
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2012, 23 : 1285 - 1291
  • [40] Long-term outcomes of the AjustA® Adjustable Single-Incision Sling for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
    Naumann, Gert
    Hagemeier, Thomas
    Zachmann, Stefan
    Al-Ani, Aktham
    Albrich, Stefan
    Skala, Christine
    Laterza, Rosa
    Linaberry, Misti
    Koelbl, Heinz
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (02) : 231 - 239