Treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma by topical photodynamic therapy with fractionated 5-aminolaevulinic acid 20% vs. two-stage topical methyl aminolaevulinate: results of a randomized controlled trial

被引:21
|
作者
Kessels, J. P. H. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kreukels, H. [5 ]
Nelemans, P. J. [4 ]
Roozeboom, M. H. [1 ]
van Pelt, H. [6 ]
Mosterd, K. [1 ,3 ]
de Haas, E. R. M. [5 ]
Kelleners-Smeets, N. W. J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Dept Dermatol, Med Ctr, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Zuyderland Med Ctr, Dept Dermatol, Heerlen, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, GROW Sch Dev Biol & Oncol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Dept Dermatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] VieCuri Med Ctr, Dept Dermatol, Venlo Venray, Netherlands
关键词
5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVES; LIGHT FRACTIONATION; 2-FOLD ILLUMINATION; FLUORESCENCE; SURGERY; GUIDELINES; KERATOSES; IMIQUIMOD; PDT;
D O I
10.1111/bjd.15967
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer and incidence rates are increasing. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a frequently used treatment, especially for superficial BCC (sBCC). Two topical photosensitizing agents are currently used to treat sBCC, namely 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) and its ester, methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL). Previous research showed a high efficacy for ALA-PDT using a twofold fractionated illumination scheme in which two light fractions of 20 J cm(-2) and 80 J cm(-2) were delivered 4 h and 6 h after ALA application. Objectives To evaluate whether twofold ALA-PDT is superior to conventional MAL-PDT for sBCC. Methods We performed a single-blind, randomized, multicentre trial in the Netherlands. Results Overall, 162 patients were randomized either to conventional MAL-PDT or twofold ALA-PDT. After 12 months, a total of six treatment failures occurred following ALA-PDT and 13 treatment failures occurred following MAL-PDT. The 12-month cumulative probability of remaining free from treatment failure was 92.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) (83.7-96.5)] for ALA-PDT and 83.4% (95% CI 73.1-90.0) for MAL-PDT (P = 0.091). Conclusions The twofold ALA-PDT scheme resulted in fewer recurrences, although the difference between both treatment groups was not statistically significant. However, ALA-PDT resulted in higher pain scores and more post-treatment side-effects compared with MAL-PDT.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1063
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 5-aminolaevulinic acid nanoemulsion is more effective than methyl-5-aminolaevulinate in daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: a nonsponsored randomized double-blind multicentre trial
    Rasanen, J. E.
    Neittaanmaki, N.
    Ylitalo, L.
    Hagman, J.
    Rissanen, P.
    Ylianttila, L.
    Salmivuori, M.
    Snellman, E.
    Gronroos, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 181 (02) : 265 - 274
  • [32] Hexyl-5-aminolaevulinate 0.2% vs. methyl-5-aminolaevulinate 16% daylight photodynamic therapy for treatment of actinic keratoses: results of a randomized double-blinded pilot trial
    Neittaanmaki-Perttu, N.
    Gronroos, M.
    Karppinen, T. T.
    Tani, T. T.
    Snellman, E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 174 (02) : 427 - 429
  • [33] Comparison of topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy with cryotherapy or fluorouracil for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma in situ - Results of a multicenter randomized trial
    Morton, C
    Horn, M
    Leman, J
    Tack, B
    Bedane, C
    Tjioe, M
    Ibbotson, S
    Khemis, A
    Wolf, P
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 142 (06) : 729 - 735
  • [34] Commentary on 'Photodynamic therapy versus topical imiquimod versus topical fluorouracil for treatment of superficial basal-cell carcinoma: a single blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial'
    Nijsten, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 172 (01) : 12 - 12
  • [35] Disappointing results and low tolerability of photodynamic therapy with topical 5-aminolaevulinic acid in psoriasis. A randomized, double-blind phase I/II study
    Schleyer, V.
    Radakovic-Fijan, S.
    Karrer, S.
    Zwingers, T.
    Tanew, A.
    Landthaler, M.
    Szeimies, R. M.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2006, 20 (07) : 823 - 828
  • [36] Factors associated with severe pain during 5-aminolaevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy for superficial basal cell carcinoma in Tayside: a review of 9 years' data
    Waters, A.
    Dawe, R.
    Ibbotson, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 161 : 132 - 133
  • [37] Optimization of photodynamic therapy with a novel self-adhesive 5-aminolaevulinic acid patch: results of two randomized controlled phase III studies
    Hauschild, A.
    Stockfleth, E.
    Popp, G.
    Borrosch, F.
    Bruening, H.
    Dominicus, R.
    Mensing, H.
    Reinhold, U.
    Reich, K.
    Moor, A. C. E.
    Stocker, M.
    Ortland, C.
    Brunnert, M.
    Szeimies, R. -M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2009, 160 (05) : 1066 - 1074
  • [38] Five-year follow-up of a randomized, prospective trial of topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy vs surgery for nodular basal cell carcinoma
    Rhodes, Lesley E.
    de Rie, Menno A.
    Leifsdottir, Ragna
    Yu, Raymond C.
    Bachmann, Ingeborg
    Goulden, Victoria
    Wong, Gavin A. E.
    Richard, Marie-Aleth
    Anstey, Alex
    Wolf, Peter
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 143 (09) : 1131 - 1136
  • [39] Photodynamic therapy versus topical imiquimod versus topical fluorouracil for treatment of superficial basal-cell carcinoma: a single blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial: a critical appraisal
    Lecluse, L. L. A.
    Spuls, Ph. I.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2015, 172 (01) : 8 - 10
  • [40] Effectiveness and safety of 0•5% colchicine cream vs. photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolaevulinate in the treatment of actinic keratosis and skin field cancerization of the forearms: a randomized controlled trial
    Miola, A. C.
    Ferreira, E. R.
    Lima, T. R. R.
    Schmitt, J. V.
    Abbade, L. P. F.
    Miot, H. A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 179 (05) : 1081 - 1087