Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews of economic evaluations - Amantadine and rimantadine in the prevention and treatment of influenza

被引:7
|
作者
Jefferson, T
Demicheli, V
Rivetti, D
Deeks, J
机构
[1] UK Cochrane Ctr, Cochrane Vaccines Field, Surrey GU16 6JP, England
[2] Univ Pavia, Inst Med Stat, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] ARPA, Environm Epidemiol Unit, Alessandria, Italy
[4] Inst Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
关键词
Influenza; Adis International Limited; Healthy Adult; Cochrane Review; Amantadine;
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199916001-00011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cochrane reviews provide standardised and regularly updated syntheses of evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions. We present the rationale for, and some of the results of, a Cochrane review of the effects of amantadine and rimantadine in the prevention and treatment of influenza. The estimates of effect will be incorporated into a decision-making model for tackling influenza in healthy adults (i.e. soldiers in the British Army). Our systematic review of the economics of influenza also provides the international context within which economic data can be interpreted and assessed as a preliminary to an economic evaluation comparing alternative prevention and treatment strategies. Systematic reviews provide powerful and relatively inexpensive evidence of effects and tolerability, which is more likely to convince decision-makers than evidence from single studies. Additionally, they can be used to focus clinical trial questions and provide strategic insight regarding the state-of-the-art knowledge of effects and economics of compounds in a specific field.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 89
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cochrane Reviews are not perfect - but generally better than non-Cochrane systematic reviews
    Bollig, Claudia
    Rueschemeyer, Georg
    Meerpohl, Joerg J.
    SUCHT-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR WISSENSCHAFT UND PRAXIS, 2020, 66 (03): : 170 - 172
  • [32] Cancer treatment reviews welcomes submission of the Cochrane Reviews
    Pavtidis, N
    Stahel, R
    Clarke, M
    Djulbegovic, B
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2006, 32 (04) : 243 - 244
  • [33] COMPARISON OF AMANTADINE AND RIMANTADINE FOR PREVENTION OF TYPE-A (RUSSIAN) INFLUENZA
    QUARLES, JM
    COUCH, RB
    CATE, TR
    GOSWICK, CB
    ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH, 1981, 1 (03) : 149 - 155
  • [34] Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
    Nasser, Mona
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 110 (06) : 753 - 754
  • [36] Introduction of Cochrane systematic reviews in nutrition
    Lopese, Katharina da Silva
    Watanabe, Norio
    ANNALS OF NUTRITION AND METABOLISM, 2023, 79 : 262 - 262
  • [37] Cochrane systematic reviews in cystic fibrosis
    Smyth, Rosalind
    Jahnke, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2006, 99 : 6 - 12
  • [38] Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy
    Moseley, Anne M.
    Elkins, Mark R.
    Herbert, Robert D.
    Maher, Christopher G.
    Sherrington, Catherine
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (10) : 1021 - 1030
  • [39] Cochrane systematic reviews: contributions and perspectives
    Boutron, Isabelle
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2019, 86 (03) : 289 - 291
  • [40] Two systematic cochrane reviews of the prevention and treatment of distal intestinal obstruction syndrome in cystic fibrosis
    Gilchrist, Francis
    Carroll, Will
    PAEDIATRIC RESPIRATORY REVIEWS, 2022, 41 : 49 - 50