Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews of economic evaluations - Amantadine and rimantadine in the prevention and treatment of influenza

被引:7
|
作者
Jefferson, T
Demicheli, V
Rivetti, D
Deeks, J
机构
[1] UK Cochrane Ctr, Cochrane Vaccines Field, Surrey GU16 6JP, England
[2] Univ Pavia, Inst Med Stat, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
[3] ARPA, Environm Epidemiol Unit, Alessandria, Italy
[4] Inst Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
关键词
Influenza; Adis International Limited; Healthy Adult; Cochrane Review; Amantadine;
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199916001-00011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Cochrane reviews provide standardised and regularly updated syntheses of evidence on the effects of healthcare interventions. We present the rationale for, and some of the results of, a Cochrane review of the effects of amantadine and rimantadine in the prevention and treatment of influenza. The estimates of effect will be incorporated into a decision-making model for tackling influenza in healthy adults (i.e. soldiers in the British Army). Our systematic review of the economics of influenza also provides the international context within which economic data can be interpreted and assessed as a preliminary to an economic evaluation comparing alternative prevention and treatment strategies. Systematic reviews provide powerful and relatively inexpensive evidence of effects and tolerability, which is more likely to convince decision-makers than evidence from single studies. Additionally, they can be used to focus clinical trial questions and provide strategic insight regarding the state-of-the-art knowledge of effects and economics of compounds in a specific field.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 89
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews of Economic EvaluationsAmantadine and Rimantadine in the Prevention and Treatment of Influenza
    Tom Jefferson
    Vittorio Demicheli
    Daniela Rivetti
    Jon Deeks
    PharmacoEconomics, 1999, 16 : 85 - 89
  • [2] Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations
    Gomersall, Judith Streak
    Jadotte, Yuri Tertilus
    Xue, Yifan
    Lockwood, Suzi
    Riddle, Dru
    Preda, Alin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) : 170 - 178
  • [3] A comparison of the quality of Cochrane systematic reviews and non Cochrane systematic reviews
    Farquhar, C.
    Popovich, I.
    Windsor, B.
    Jordan, V.
    Shea, B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [4] Prevention of bacterial meningitis: An overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
    Prasad, Kameshwar
    Karlupia, Neha
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2007, 101 (10) : 2037 - 2043
  • [5] ASSESSING THE METHODS FOR SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS
    Paone, S.
    Di Tanna, G. L.
    Corio, M.
    Jefferson, T.
    Cerbo, M.
    Migliore, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A423 - A423
  • [6] SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: UTILITY OR FUTILITY?
    Anderson, Rob
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 19 (03) : 350 - 364
  • [7] Process of developing systematic reviews, including Cochrane reviews
    Bala, Malgorzata M.
    Lesniak, Wiktoria
    Jaeschke, Roman
    POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 125 : 16 - 25
  • [8] NOT ALL COCHRANE REVIEWS ARE GOOD QUALITY SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Deshpande, S.
    Misso, K.
    Westwood, M.
    Stirk, L.
    de Kock, S.
    Kleijnen, J.
    Clayton, D.
    Kleijnen, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A371 - A371
  • [9] Systematic reviews and the Cochrane collaboration
    Kale, R
    Silagy, C
    NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA, 1996, 9 (01): : 3 - 4
  • [10] Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
    Solari, A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 (01)