Electoral gender quotas have been viewed as a way to promote greater inclusion and enhance the quality of democracy. They have also been criticized as 'artificial' solutions to women's under-representation in politics and as a means to bolster the legitimacy of authoritarian regimes. Mapping these debates, this epilog discusses three major contributions of the articles in this special issue, both on their own and in dialog with one another. The first two contributions are empirical, illustrating how democratic and non-democratic institutions, respectively, can promote women's representation through gender quotas. The third is the theoretical concept of 'sustainable representation,' or the role that quotas may or may not play in instituting durable changes in patterns of access to political office. Together, these case studies present new ways forward for fleshing out what quotas ultimately mean for women's empowerment and democratic development in both Africa and beyond.
机构:
Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Business Sch, New Brunswick, NJ USARutgers State Univ, Rutgers Business Sch, New Brunswick, NJ USA
Liao, Rose C.
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Loureiro, Gilberto
Taboada, Alvaro G.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Mississippi State Univ, Coll Business, 310 H McCool Hall,POB 9580, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USARutgers State Univ, Rutgers Business Sch, New Brunswick, NJ USA