Soil Water and Shallow Groundwater Relations in an Agricultural Hillslope

被引:25
|
作者
Logsdon, S. D. [1 ]
Hernandez-Ramirez, G. [1 ]
Hatfield, J. L. [1 ]
Sauer, T. J. [1 ]
Prueger, J. H. [1 ]
Schilling, K. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa Geol Survey Iowa DNR, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
CAPILLARY-FRINGE; FIELD; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; TRANSPORT; MOISTURE; FLUXES;
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2008.0385
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Shallow water table scan contribute water for plant use; therefore, plant available water includes not only the water stored in the root zone, but also the water moving up from below the root zone. The purpose of this study was to quantify the amount of water moving upward to the root zone. Automated water content reflectometers were used to monitor soil water content across a landscape in Central Iowa, which had varying shallow water tables. Either manual or automated water table depths were measured. Tipping bucket raingage and eddy covariance evapotranspiration (ET) methods were used to measure rain and evapotranspiration as part of the water balance. Upward water movement ranges were determined from water balance and uncertainties for each component (rain, ET, change in soil water content). In 2006 out of 53 dry days (days that did not have any rain), 37, 43, and 46 d showed net upward flux for shoulder, backslope, and toeslope positions, shown by an uncertainty range that did not overlap zero. In 2007, 37 out of 62 dry days showed net upward flux for the toeslope position. The mean significant net upward flux for dry days was 2.6, 3.2, and 3.1 mm d(-1) for the shoulder, backslope, and toeslope positions in 2006, and 2.5 mm d(-1) for the toeslope position in 2007. Mean ET on nonrain days was 4.0 and 4.1 mm d(-1) in 2006 and 2007. Automated equipment used to develop a water balance approach provided a quantitative approach to estimate net upward soil water flux in agricultural fields.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1468
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measurement and inference of profile soil-water dynamics at different hillslope positions in a semiarid agricultural watershed
    Green, Timothy R.
    Erskine, Robert H.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
  • [22] Soil erodibility and processes of water erosion on hillslope
    Bryan, RB
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2000, 32 (3-4) : 385 - 415
  • [23] Technology of application of agricultural defensives and relations with the risk of contamination of the water and the soil
    de Oliveira, Edicleia
    Maggi, Marcio Furlan
    de Matos, Eliza
    de Ramos, Moises Sheifter
    Vagner, Marcus Winicius
    Lopes, Edina Cristiane
    APPLIED RESEARCH & AGROTECHNOLOGY, 2009, 2 (03): : 171 - 179
  • [24] Water saving practices enhance regional efficiency of water consumption and water productivity in an arid agricultural area with shallow groundwater
    Xue, Jingyuan
    Guan, Huade
    Huo, Zailin
    Wang, Fengxin
    Huang, Guanhua
    Boll, Jan
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 194 : 78 - 89
  • [25] Effect of Soil Texture on Water and Salt Transport in Freeze-Thaw Soil in the Shallow Groundwater Area
    Wang, Erqing
    Chen, Junfeng
    Liu, Lei
    Cui, Lihong
    Xue, Jing
    Ren, Jiameng
    Du, Qi
    WATER, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [27] Quality of shallow groundwater and drainage water in irrigated agricultural lands in a Mediterranean coastal region of Turkey
    Odemis, Berkant
    Bozkurt, Sefer
    Agga, Necat
    Yalcin, Mehmet
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 115 (1-3) : 361 - 379
  • [28] Monitoring shallow groundwater quality in agricultural watersheds in Denmark
    Rasmussen, P
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 1996, 27 (04): : 309 - 319
  • [29] Denitrification in shallow groundwater in a coastal agricultural area in Japan
    H. Toda
    Y. Mochizuki
    T. Kawanishi
    H. Kawashima
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2002, 63 : 167 - 173
  • [30] Denitrification in shallow groundwater in a coastal agricultural area in Japan
    Toda, H
    Mochizuki, Y
    Kawanishi, T
    Kawashima, H
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2002, 63 (2-3) : 167 - 173