Development and application of a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method for the determination of tetracyclines in beef by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

被引:68
|
作者
Mookantsa, S. O. S. [1 ,2 ]
Dube, S. [1 ]
Nindi, M. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Africa, Dept Chem, Coll Sci Engn & Technol, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Botswana Natl Vet Lab, Residue Sect, Gaborone, Botswana
关键词
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction; Sample clean-up; Sample preparation; Mass spectrometry; Dispersive solid phase microextraction; Tetracycline; PHASE MICROEXTRACTION; TISSUES; CHLORTETRACYCLINE; OXYTETRACYCLINE; EXTRACTION; RESIDUES; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.talanta.2015.11.006
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A rapid, cost effective and environmentally friendly extraction method, based on dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) was developed for the determination of six tetracyclines in meat destined for human consumption. Meat extracts were analysed for tetracyclines using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), a sensitive and selective analytical technique. Various factors influencing the pre-concentration of tetracyclines such as sample pH, type and volume of both disperser solvent and extraction solvent were optimized. Validation parameters such as calibration function, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), detection capability (CC alpha), decision limit (CC beta), accuracy and precision were established according to Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. Linearity in the range of 25200 mu g kg(-1) was obtained with regression coefficients ranging from 0.9991 to 0.9998. Recoveries of spiked blank muscle samples at three levels (50, 100 and 150 mu g kg(-1)) ranged from 80% to 105% and reproducibility was between 2% and 7%. LODs and LOQs ranged from 2.2 to 3.6 mu g kg(-1) and from 7.4 to 11.5 mu g kg(-1) respectively while CC alpha ranged from 105 to 111 mu g kg(-1) and CC beta ranged from 107 to 122 gg kg(-1). The proposed method compared well with the existing accepted dispersive solid phase extraction method and was successfully applied to the pre-concentration and determination of tetracyclines in meat samples. Eleven of the thirty bovine muscle samples obtained from local abattoirs and butcheries were found to contain residues of two tetracycline antibiotics (chlortetracycline and oxytetracycline), with oxytetracycline being the most detected. Concentration levels of the tetracycline residues detected in bovine muscle samples were lower (12.4 and 68.9 mu g kg(-1)) than the stipulated European Union maximum residue level (MRL) of 100 mu g kg(-1), hence the meat was fit for human consumption. From this work it can be concluded that the DLLME is indeed a greener sample preparation method and could be used as an alternative to dispersive solid phase microextraction (dSPE). (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 328
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Combined with Ultrahigh Performance Liquid Chromatography/Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Determination of Organophosphate Esters in Aqueous Samples
    Luo, Haiying
    Xian, Yanping
    Guo, Xindong
    Luo, Donghui
    Wu, Yuluan
    Lu, Yujing
    Yang, Bao
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [42] Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, an effective tool for the determination of synthetic cannabinoids in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
    Tomai, Pierpaolo
    Gentili, Alessandra
    Curini, Roberta
    Gottardo, Rossella
    Tagliaro, Franco
    Fanali, Salvatore
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 11 (03) : 292 - 298
  • [43] Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of three cytokinin compounds in fruits and vegetables by liquid chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry
    Campillo, N.
    Vinas, P.
    Ferez-Melgarejo, G.
    Hernandez-Cordoba, M.
    TALANTA, 2013, 116 : 376 - 381
  • [44] Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, an effective tool for the determination of synthetic cannabinoids in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
    Pierpaolo Tomai
    Alessandra Gentili
    Roberta Curini
    Rossella Gottardo
    Franco Tagliaro
    Salvatore Fanali
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2021, 11 (03) : 292 - 298
  • [45] Determination of organochlorine pesticides in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
    Cortada, Carol
    Vidal, Lorena
    Pastor, Raul
    Santiago, Noemi
    Canals, Antonio
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 649 (02) : 218 - 221
  • [46] Determination of volatile phenols in red wines by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry detection
    Farina, Laura
    Boido, Eduardo
    Carrau, Francisco
    Dellacassa, Eduardo
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1157 (1-2) : 46 - 50
  • [47] Determination of Phthalates in Milk by Ultrasound-Assisted Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
    Tuncel, Semra G.
    Senlik, Damla
    ANALYTICAL LETTERS, 2016, 49 (09) : 1334 - 1343
  • [48] Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of pesticide residues in nutraceutical drops
    Szarka, Agnesa
    Turkova, Dominika
    Hrouzkova, Svetlana
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2018, 1570 : 126 - 134
  • [49] Estrogenic compounds determination in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and micellar electrokinetic chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry
    D'Orazio, Giovanni
    Asensio-Ramos, Maria
    Hernandez-Borges, Javier
    Fanali, Salvatore
    Angel Rodriguez-Delgado, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2014, 1344 : 109 - 121
  • [50] Temperature sensitive polymer-dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the determination of phenols
    Chen, Xiaomei
    Guo, Zhian
    Wang, Yi
    Liu, Yufeng
    Xu, Yidong
    Liu, Jie
    Li, Zhiqiang
    Zhao, Jingchan
    JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2019, 1592 : 183 - 187