A randomized controlled trial of a smoking cessation intervention for pregnant adolescents

被引:33
|
作者
Albrecht, Susan A. [1 ]
Caruthers, Donna
Patrick, Thelma
Reynolds, Maureen
Salamie, Denise
Higgins, Linda W.
Braxter, Betty
Kim, Yookyung
Mlynarchek, Sara
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Antonio J & Janet Palumbo Cystic Fibrosis Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Childrens Hosp Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
adolescence; pregnancy; smoking cessation;
D O I
10.1097/00006199-200611000-00004
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: The smoking prevalence rate among pregnant adolescents has been estimated at 59-62%, and 60-80% of these adolescents continue to smoke throughout their pregnancies. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term effects. of smoking cessation strategies tailored to the pregnant adolescent to attain and maintain abstinence. The specific aim was to examine differences in short- and long-term smoking behaviors among three groups: Teen FreshStart (TFS), Teen FreshStart Plus Buddy TFS-B, and Usual Care (UC) control. Methods: In this randomized controlled intervention study, a 3-group (TFS, TFS-B, and UC) by 3-occasion (baseline, 8 weeks postrandomization, and 1-year following study entry) design was used. The study included 142 pregnant adolescents who were aged 14 to 19 years. Both self-reported smoking status collected on the Smoking History Questionnaire and saliva cotinine levels were used to identify smoking behaviors. Results: There were no significant differences among the three treatment groups at baseline in terms of the racial, distribution, age, gestational age, age of menses initiation, number in family household, number of family members who smoked, or tobacco use. A significant difference be tween the UC group and the TFS-B group (p = .010) was seen in smoking behaviors measured 8 weeks following treatment initiation. At 1 year following study entry, however, there were no differences between the groups in smoking behaviors. Discussion: The TFS-B intervention was more effective in attaining short-term smoking cessation in the pregnant adolescent than TFS or UC. Findings suggest that the peer-enhanced programming had a limited effect but could not sustain the participant beyond postpartum (1 year following study entry). Future studies should include relapse prevention to sustain smoking abstinence into the postpartum period.
引用
收藏
页码:402 / 410
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness of a complex intervention on smoking in adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial
    Leiva, Alfonso
    Estela, Andreu
    Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
    Aguilo, Antoni
    Llobera, Joan
    Yanez, Aina M.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 114 : 88 - 94
  • [32] A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Pauly, Mark V.
    Glick, Henry A.
    Puig, Andrea
    Asch, David A.
    Galvin, Robert
    Zhu, Jingsan
    Wan, Fei
    DeGuzman, Jill
    Corbett, Elizabeth
    Weiner, Janet
    Audrain-McGovern, Janet
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 360 (07): : 699 - 709
  • [33] Randomized trial of single versus multi-session group smoking cessation intervention for adolescents
    Joffe, A
    Ash, S
    Sheng, PL
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2005, 36 (02) : 118 - 118
  • [34] RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TRANSDERMAL CLONIDINE FOR SMOKING CESSATION
    HILLEMAN, DE
    MOHIUDDIN, SM
    DELCORE, MG
    LUCAS, BD
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1993, 27 (09) : 1025 - 1028
  • [35] A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation
    Volpp, KG
    Levy, AG
    Asch, DA
    Berlin, JA
    Murphy, JJ
    Gomez, A
    Sox, H
    Zhu, JS
    Lerman, C
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (01) : 12 - 18
  • [36] Smoking cessation via the Internet: A randomized clinical trial of an Internet intervention as adjuvant treatment in a smoking cessation intervention
    Japuntich, Sandra J.
    Zelmer, Mark E.
    Smith, Stevens S.
    Jorenby, Douglas E.
    Valdez, Jose A.
    Fiore, Michael C.
    Baker, Timothy B.
    Gustafson, David H.
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2006, 8 : S59 - S67
  • [37] Family-Based Smoking Cessation Intervention for Smoking Fathers and Nonsmoking Mothers with a Child: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Chan, Sophia Siu Chee
    Cheung, Yee Tak Derek
    Fong, Daniel Yee Tak
    Emmons, Karen
    Leung, Angela Yee Man
    Leung, Doris Yin Ping
    Lam, Tai Hing
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2017, 182 : 260 - 266
  • [38] Preliminary Outcomes of a Digital Therapeutic Intervention for Smoking Cessation in Adult Smokers: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Webb, Jamie
    Peerbux, Sarrah
    Smittenaar, Peter
    Siddiqui, Sarim
    Sherwani, Yusuf
    Ahmed, Maroof
    MacRae, Hannah
    Puri, Hannah
    Bhalla, Sangita
    Majeed, Azeem
    JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2020, 7 (10):
  • [39] A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Tailored Group Smoking Cessation Intervention for HIV-Infected Smokers
    Moadel, Alyson B.
    Bernstein, Steven L.
    Mermelstein, Robin J.
    Arnsten, Julia H.
    Dolce, Eileen H.
    Shuter, Jonathan
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2012, 61 (02) : 208 - 215
  • [40] A randomized controlled trial of a videoconferencing smoking cessation intervention for Korean American women: preliminary findings
    Kim, Sun S.
    Sitthisongkram, Somporn
    Bernstein, Kunsook
    Fang, Hua
    Choi, Won S.
    Ziedonis, Douglas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2016, 8 : 453 - 462