Bowel injury in robotic gynecologic surgery: risk factors and management options. A systematic review

被引:17
|
作者
Picerno, Toni [1 ]
Sloan, Nancy L. [1 ]
Escobar, Pedro [2 ]
Ramirez, Pedro T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Christiana Care Hlth Syst, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Newark, DE 19718 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol & Reprod Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
bowel surgery; robotic surgery; surgical complications; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SINGLE-SITE HYSTERECTOMY; STAGE CERVICAL-CANCER; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; LEARNING-CURVE; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2016.08.040
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We sought to analyze the published literature on bowel injuries in patients undergoing gynecologic robotic surgery with the aim to determine its incidence, predisposing factors, and treatment options. DATA SOURCES: Studies included in this analysis were identified by searching PubMed Central, OVID Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials. gov databases. References for all studies were also reviewed. Time frame for data analysis spanned from November 2001 through December 2014. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All English-language studies reporting the incidence of bowel injury or complications during robotic gynecologic surgery were included. Studies with data duplication, not in English, case reports, or studies that did not explicitly define bowel injury incidence were excluded. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: The Guidelines for Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies were used to complete the systematic review with the exception of scoring study quality and a single primary reviewer. RESULTS: In all, 370 full-text articles were reviewed and 144 met the inclusion criteria. There were 84 bowel injuries recorded in 13,444 patients for an incidence of 1 in 160 (0.62%; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.76%). There were no significant differences in incidence of bowel injury by procedure type. The anatomic location of injury, etiology, and management were rarely reported. Of the bowel injuries, 87% were recognized intraoperatively and the majority (58%) managed via a minimally invasive approach. Of 13,444 patients, 3 (0.02%) (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.07%) died in the immediate postoperative period and no deaths were a result of a bowel injury. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of bowel injury in robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery is 1 in 160. When the location of bowel injuries were specified, they most commonly occurred in the colon and rectum and most were managed via a minimally invasive approach.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 26
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prevention and management of bowel injury during gynecologic laparoscopy: an update
    Eisner, Isabel S.
    Wadhwa, Ruchi K.
    Downing, Keith T.
    Singhal, Pankaj K.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 31 (04) : 245 - 250
  • [42] Robotic gynecologic surgery: State of the art. Review of the literature
    Zacharopoulou, C.
    Sananes, N.
    Baulon, E.
    Garbin, O.
    Wattiez, A.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2010, 39 (06): : 444 - 452
  • [43] Clostridioides difficile Infection in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: A Systematic Review of Risk Factors and Approach in Management
    Sangurima, Leslie
    Malik, Maujid Masood
    Ganatra, Nency
    Siby, Rosemary
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Khan, Sara
    Cheriachan, Doju
    Mohammed, Lubna
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [44] Short bowel syndrome: A review of management options
    Seetharam, Prasad
    Rodrigues, Gabriel
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (04): : 229 - 235
  • [45] Management of difficult bowel adhesions during laparoscopic gynecologic surgery
    Tamhane, N.
    Mikhail, E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (03) : S777 - S778
  • [46] Systematic review of the prevalence, risk factors, diagnosis and management of meniscal injury in dogs: Part 2
    McCready, D. J.
    Ness, M. G.
    JOURNAL OF SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2016, 57 (04) : 194 - 204
  • [47] Isolated ictal apnea in neonatal age: Clinical features and treatment options. A systematic review
    Falsaperla, Raffaele
    Consentino, Maria Chiara
    Vitaliti, Giovanna
    Marino, Silvia
    Ruggieri, Martino
    AUTONOMIC NEUROSCIENCE-BASIC & CLINICAL, 2022, 243
  • [48] Management, Prevention, and Sequelae of Adhesions in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Farag, Sara
    Padilla, Pamela Frazzini
    Smith, Katherine A.
    Sprague, Michael L.
    Zimberg, Stephen E.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 25 (07) : 1194 - 1216
  • [49] Risk of thrombosis and bleeding in gynecologic cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lavikainen, Lauri I.
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Luomaranta, Anna L.
    Cartwright, Rufus
    Kalliala, RIlkka E. J.
    Couban, Rachel J.
    Aaltonen, Riikka L.
    Aro, Karoliina M.
    Cardenas, Jovita L.
    Devereaux, P. J.
    Galambosi, Paivi J.
    Ge, Fang Zhou
    Halme, Alex L. E.
    Haukka, Jari
    Izett-Kay, Matthew L.
    Joronen, Kirsi M.
    Karjalainen, Paivi K.
    Khamani, Nadina
    Oksjoki, Sanna M.
    Pourjamal, Negar
    Singh, Tino
    Tahtinen, Riikka M.
    Vernooij, Robin W. M.
    Tikkinen, Kari A. O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (04) : 403 - 416
  • [50] Risk factors for immediate failure of outpatient surgery in gynecologic surgery
    Siebert, David
    Giraudet, Geraldine
    Collinet, Pierre
    Gonzalez Estevez, Max
    Cosson, Michel
    Rubod, Chrystele
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 159 (02) : 592 - 599