The Mexican Cervical Cancer Screening Trial Self-Sampling for Human Papillomavirus With Unaided Visual Inspection as a Secondary Screen

被引:17
|
作者
Belinson, Jerome L. [1 ]
Pretorius, Robert G. [3 ]
Enerson, Christine [4 ]
Garcia, Francisco [1 ]
Perez Cruz, Eduardo
Belinson, Suzanne E. [5 ]
Yeverino Garcia, Eduardo
Brainard, Jennnifer [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Pathol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] So Calif Permanente Med Grp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fontana, CA USA
[4] Prevent Oncol Int, Morelia, Michoacan, Mexico
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Prevent Med, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
HPV; Self-sampling; Screening; ACETIC-ACID; WOMEN; CRYOTHERAPY; PREVENTION; LESIONS; INDIA; RISK; HPV;
D O I
10.1111/IGC.0b013e318197f479
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Mexican Cervical Cancer Screening (MECCS) study took place in the State of Michoacan. Primary screening was by self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV). The objectives were to increase the specificity of primary HPV screening by requiring 2 positive HPV tests I year apart in women whose secondary screen was negative according to an acetic acid-aided visual inspection (VIA). In addition, we postulated that the sensitivity of VIA would be sufficient to identify large preinvasive lesions and cancers unsuitable for cryotherapy if applied in a see-and-treat algorithm. A total of 8621 women (aged 30-50 years) were screened, and 14.3% were positive for HR-HPV In phase 1, 11.9% of the HPV-positive women were VIA-positive and were referred for colposcopy with directed and random biopsies. If VIA-negative, women repeated the self-sample I year later to detect persistent HR-HPV (25.2% were positive). If persistently HR-HPV-positive in phase 2, patients again had VIA, then all women (both VIA-positive and -negative) received directed and random biopsies. If cryotherapy had been used to treat HPV- and VIA-positive women in phase 1 or persistent HR-HPV-positive (phase 2), the potential risk of under treatment Would have been 4.1%, and 66.4% of the treated patients Would have had normal or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I on biopsy. The VIA triage would refer 0.73% of the patients to colposcopy owing to the lesion size, location, or the presence of a cancer. On the basis of this pilot study, we are encouraged to explore and evaluate a rapid, more sensitive, and more specific self-test.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 32
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING WITH SELF-SAMPLING FOR HUMAN PAPILLOMAVIRUS (HPV) TESTING IN TAIWAN
    Tsai, B. C.
    Chow, I. H. I.
    Liao, C. H.
    You, S. L.
    Tang, C. H.
    Pwu, R. F.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A656 - A657
  • [22] Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening
    Meenan, Richard T.
    Troja, Catherine
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Tiro, Jasmin A.
    Lin, John
    Anderson, Melissa L.
    Gao, Hongyuan
    Green, Beverly B.
    Winer, Rachel L.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (03) : E234052
  • [23] Study protocol of the ACCESS trial: a randomised trial to evaluate the effectiveness of human papillomavirus testing by self-sampling in cervical cancer screening uptake and precancer detection
    Fujita, Misuzu
    Shimazu, Minobu
    Nagashima, Kengo
    Suzuki, Misae
    Tauchi, Ichiro
    Sakuma, Miwa
    Yamamoto, Setsuko
    Shozu, Makio
    Hanaoka, Hideki
    Tsuruoka, Nobuhide
    Kasai, Tokuzo
    Hata, Akira
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [24] Evaluation of the self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia
    Gustavo Allende
    Pedro Surriabre
    Leyddy Cáceres
    Diego Bellot
    Neli Ovando
    Andrea Torrico
    Pamela Calle
    Carla Ascarrunz
    Sophie Alexander
    Michel Bossens
    Véronique Fontaine
    Patricia Rodríguez
    BMC Public Health, 19
  • [26] Evaluation of the self-sampling for cervical cancer screening in Bolivia
    Allende, Gustavo
    Surriabre, Pedro
    Caceres, Leyddy
    Bellot, Diego
    Ovando, Neli
    Torrico, Andrea
    Calle, Pamela
    Ascarrunz, Carla
    Alexander, Sophie
    Bossens, Michel
    Fontaine, Veronique
    Rodriguez, Patricia
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [27] Women's perspectives on human papillomavirus self-sampling in the context of the UK cervical screening programme
    Williams, Denitza
    Davies, Myfanwy
    Fiander, Alison
    Farewell, Daniel
    Hillier, Sharon
    Brain, Kate
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (05) : 1031 - 1040
  • [28] To eliminate cervical cancer in Canada, nationwide funding of self-sampling for human papillomavirus is needed
    Charlebois, Shannon
    Kean, Sarah
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2024, 196 (21) : E729 - E730
  • [29] Community-randomised controlled trial embedded in the Anishinaabek Cervical Cancer Screening Study: human papillomavirus self-sampling versus Papanicolaou cytology
    Zehbe, Ingeborg
    Jackson, Robert
    Wood, Brianne
    Weaver, Bruce
    Escott, Nicholas
    Severini, Alberto
    Krajden, Mel
    Bishop, Lisa
    Morrisseau, Kyla
    Ogilvie, Gina
    Burchell, Ann N.
    Little, Julian
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (10):
  • [30] Shanxi Province cervical cancer screening study II: Self-sampling for high-risk human papillomavirus compared to direct sampling for human papillomavirus and liquid based cervical cytology
    Belinson, JL
    Qiao, YL
    Pretorius, RG
    Zhang, WH
    Rong, SD
    Huang, MN
    Zhao, FH
    Wu, LY
    Ren, SD
    Huang, RD
    Washington, MF
    Pan, QJ
    Li, L
    Fife, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2003, 13 (06) : 819 - 826