A Review of Changes in Mountain Land Use and Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice

被引:22
|
作者
Patru-Stupariu, Ileana [1 ,2 ]
Hossu, Constantina Alina [2 ,3 ]
Gradinaru, Simona Raluca [2 ,3 ]
Nita, Andreea [2 ,3 ]
Stupariu, Mihai-Sorin [1 ,4 ]
Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina [1 ]
Gavrilidis, Athanasios-Alexandru [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bucharest, Transdisciplinary Res Ctr Landscape Terr Informat, CeLTIS, ICUB,Res Inst, Bucharest 050095, Romania
[2] Univ Bucharest, Fac Geog, Dept Reg Geog & Environm, Bucharest 010041, Romania
[3] Univ Bucharest, Ctr Environm Res & Impact Studies, Bucharest 010041, Romania
[4] Univ Bucharest, Math & Comp Sci, Bucharest 010014, Romania
关键词
mountain ecosystem services; land use change; scenarios; stakeholders; COVER CHANGE; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LANDSCAPE PATTERNS; PROTECTED AREAS; TRADE-OFFS; MANAGEMENT; FOREST; GOVERNANCE; INDICATORS; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.3390/land9090336
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global changes impact the human-environment relationship, and, in particular, they affect the provision of ecosystem services. Mountain ecosystems provide a wide range of such services, but they are highly sensitive and vulnerable to change due to various human pressures and natural processes. We conducted a literature survey that focused on two main issues. The first was the identification of quantitative methods aimed at assessing the impact of land use changes in mountain regions and the related ecosystem services. The second was the analysis of the extent to which the outcomes of these assessments are useful and transferable to stakeholders. We selected papers through a keyword-driven search of the ISI Web of Knowledge and other international databases. The keywords used for the search were mountain land use change and ecosystem service. Quantitative approaches to ecosystem service assessment rely on suitable indicators, therefore land use/land cover can be used as an appropriate proxy. Landscape metrics are a powerful analytical tool; their use can increase the accuracy of assessments and facilitate the mitigation of specific phenomena, such as fragmentation or the reduction of core habitat areas. Mapping is essential: it is the basis for spatial analyzes and eases the interactions between stakeholders. Land use/land cover change is a temporal process, so both past and future approaches are meaningful. It is necessary to enhance information transfer from theory to practice. Increasing stakeholder awareness can lead to suitable management solutions, and, reciprocally, stakeholder feedback can help improve current assessment methodologies and contribute to developing new tools that are suitable for specific problems.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Land use changes, degradation, and impact on ecosystem services in Asia and Southeast Asia
    Vadrevu, Krishna
    Gutman, Garik
    Tsuneo, Matsunaga
    Justice, Chris
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 35 (03) : 919 - 922
  • [32] Assessing the impact of Land use changes on ecosystem services in the Alledighe rangeland, Ethiopia
    Admasu, Simeneh
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (07)
  • [33] Distinguishing the relative contributions of climate and land use/cover changes to ecosystem services from a geospatial perspective
    Ma, Shuai
    Li, Yan
    Zhang, Yinghu
    Wang, Liang-Jie
    Jiang, Jiang
    Zhang, Jinchi
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 136
  • [34] A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration
    Turner, Katrine Grace
    Anderson, Sharolyn
    Gonzales-Chang, Mauricio
    Costanza, Robert
    Courville, Sasha
    Dalgaard, Tommy
    Dominati, Estelle
    Kubiszewski, Ida
    Ogilvy, Sue
    Porfirio, Luciana
    Ratna, Nazmun
    Sandhu, Harpinder
    Sutton, Paul C.
    Svenning, Jens-Christian
    Turner, Graham Mark
    Varennes, Yann-David
    Voinov, Alexey
    Wratten, Stephen
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2016, 319 : 190 - 207
  • [35] Ecosystem Service Values as Related to Land Use and Land Cover Changes in Ethiopia: A Review
    Biedemariam, Muluberhan
    Birhane, Emiru
    Demissie, Biadgilgn
    Tadesse, Tewodros
    Gebresamuel, Girmay
    Habtu, Solomon
    LAND, 2022, 11 (12)
  • [36] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ecosystem Management With Ecosystem Services: From Theory to Practice
    Boerema, A.
    Van Passel, S.
    Meire, P.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 152 : 207 - 218
  • [37] The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change
    Metzger, MJ
    Rounsevell, MDA
    Acosta-Michlik, L
    Leemans, R
    Schrötere, D
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 114 (01) : 69 - 85
  • [38] Water funds and payments for ecosystem services: practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice
    Goldman-Benner, Rebecca L.
    Benitez, Silvia
    Boucher, Timothy
    Calvache, Alejandro
    Daily, Gretchen
    Kareiva, Peter
    Kroeger, Timm
    Ramos, Aurelio
    ORYX, 2012, 46 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [39] The Impact of Land Use and Land Cover Changes on Ecosystem Services Value in Laos between 2000 and 2020
    Ma, Jun
    Wang, Jinliang
    Zhang, Jianpeng
    He, Suling
    Liu, Lanfang
    Zhong, Xuzheng
    LAND, 2024, 13 (10)
  • [40] Research Progress on Changes in Land Use and Land Cover in the Western Himalayas (India) and Effects on Ecosystem Services
    Mondal, Partho Protim
    Zhang, Yili
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)